Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 218
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Not really related, but I once built an engine for somebody [had them there watching and being my gopher], strapped the head on and started to set the valve clearances and the motor wouldn't turn over TDC [turning it by hand]. Would go up and clunk, not hard, but a solid lock, I didn't force it like my gopher wanted me to do.....lol hitting the head, I 'd wound the valve adjusters out so knew it couldn't be them???

I stripped the head off and all the pistons were coming up proud in the bore by 2-3mm. Went and got the boxes the pistons came in and they were the correct ones by the box and part numbers. And it was a major and trusted company. It was something I didn't check.......didn't expect it.

I ended up sending them back to the business that I got them off and had another set sent to me. They couldn't believe it either - and wasn't their fault, the wrong pistons had come in the right box from the factory. We couldn't even figure out what engine the pistons were for? The gudgeon pin height was set lower in the piston giving it more length at TDC. the piston dia was good, the rings and lands fit, but the wrong pin height. It wasn't a Nissan BTW.

with the block bored 40 thou over and minimum use after it would i be able to put some other brand cast pistons in this motor to try again? different tuner. the guy wasnt real good at the wolf to start off with

should i do leakdown test still or is the compression test enough to warrant pulling it apart?

wanna go full forged motor but id blow so much on it if i did. coz id get this and that and then i might aswell get that and that also sorta thing

Edited by joe blo

That compression test shows some cylinders at 60

so all the gases are blowing by and into the sump, then that would result in oil and gas venting up to the head and out the breathers wouldnt it?

Did you say the workshop installed the pistons and rings?

When you bore out the cylinders they have to be left with very light scratches, deep scratches stop it bedding in, and i dont think 4000rpm and 20psi is a good idea for atleast a few thousand km's,

You might be glazing up the rings instead of bedding them, to bed them you load the engine up under 3000rpm in a high gear for a 1000ks or so or can someone correct me if its changed?

I think the problem is either the ring installation, the boring and clearance , and the run in procedure,

I think the whole process sounds rushed , you cant just build a motor and be on the dyno after a few hundred km's and be boosting up to 20psi

surely that isnt good for rings that are trying to bed in, maybe that caused a few rings to break if they werent already

Edited by SliverS2

I may be wrong but that engine was not run in properly. It's as simple as that, pistons out, re hone the bores and new rings at a minimum.

run in is simple, load it up, let it cool load it up, let it cool then tune flat out..... done it that way for years no failures... very often the farthest it drives is from engine hoist to dyno.

run in is simple, load it up, let it cool load it up, let it cool then tune flat out..... done it that way for years no failures... very often the farthest it drives is from engine hoist to dyno.

Exactly right!

People get carried away with run in when its not necessary. You want a good amount of load straight off to get the rings to 'bed in', otherwise it just wont happen and if it does, it wont be as good as it can or should be. And it happens alot faster then people think.

Driving around for 1000kms on a safe low power, rpm restricted tune is a wives tale and only slowing down the process. Get a proper understanding how rings work first then you can figure out why thats not the best way to bed in a new engine.

Its the same with engines that are assembled with heaps of oil on the rings and bores....just makes it harder to get rings to seal and 'bed in' properly.

Exactly right!

People get carried away with run in when its not necessary. You want a good amount of load straight off to get the rings to 'bed in', otherwise it just wont happen and if it does, it wont be as good as it can or should be. And it happens alot faster then people think.

Driving around for 1000kms on a safe low power, rpm restricted tune is a wives tale and only slowing down the process. Get a proper understanding how rings work first then you can figure out why thats not the best way to bed in a new engine.

Its the same with engines that are assembled with heaps of oil on the rings and bores....just makes it harder to get rings to seal and 'bed in' properly.

Ive always been a bit confused bout the run in procedure, some different opinions around, but if you guys say you've done hundreds of engines with no failure then ill take your word on it..

I wouldn't take it much over 6500-7k with standard everything, plus with stock cams and a non stupid sized turbo you don't need to take it over that to make big power.

piston clearance is all based on the pistons being used, they will state what is recommended. Forged are usually quite a bit larger due to expansion.

Status I agree with what you have said, also my understanding is boost actually helps the rings bed in quicker, but from those compression test results my experience says those rings didn't bed in.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'll just reiterate that it's best to do all the wiring diagnostics, before even thinking about buying replacement solenoids ~ that is, be absolutely sure the solenoid is bad.....ie; bad connector(s), rodents chewed through a wire, etc etc. If you don't so this, you can fork out all the money for solenoids, only to find something else is wrong (this'll make you cry if you pull the valvebody only to find a broken wire is at fault... ...some more glue on the solenoid packs -- this is the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly.... ...these are all shift solenoids ~ ostensibly they're the same as the shift solenoids from the 4-speed auto.... ...this is the RE4R01A solenoid set... ...with these, you have 3 shift solenoids attached to the plate, and the separate solenoid is the EPC solenoid (line pressure control) -- with both designs, the TC lockup clutch solenoid (also PWM so they could slide the clutch shut), is located on the lower valvebody half.... ...(story time)...back in the 90's, it was a common fault that the EPC solenoid (or TC-lock solenoid) would fail, but Nissan only sold them as part of the assembly (think ~$350 at the time) ~ thing was, Isuzu also used these boxes in light commercials, and you could buy the PWM solenoid as a separate part, so it was possible to buy/use that solenoid (around $65), and make it fit (remove the circlip, fit to old plate and deal with wiring)...making it a more cost effective repair. I've not seen the RE5R01A shift solenoid assembly, but with the 4-speed RE4R01A it was possible to hack/fit a single shift solenoid onto an other working set, using a donor solenoid from another set with failed EPC....(by rights the whole set should be replaced), but it ends up being a question of how much life is left in the box itself ; sometimes it's a viable repair to fix one solenoid, just to get another 100k of road miles out of it before it needs first overhaul...other times the box is that old/worn, you're as well doing first overhaul and replacing the solenoids and starting fresh... What Nissan did here with the 5-speed, was relocate the EPC solenoid to the lower valvebody (next to the TC lockup solenoid), and stuck the direct-drive clutch solenoid (for the extra gear) where the EPC solenoid used to be on the 4-speed....I can only imagine they did this for serviceability ; the PWM solenoids are most likely to fail, and it's a doddle to drop the pan and change these out (as opposed to dropping the valvebody itself to get at a top mounted EPC)... ...also keep in mind, that some BMW 3/5 series & Mazda (and maybe some Ford/Mazda rebadges, not sure), also used the RE5R01A box under a different name/part number...not saying parts availability is any better, but sometimes it helps to know this when it comes to NOS floating about in the EU.... HTH  
    • FWIW, air jacks are actually pretty light and simple to add, they are just 4 hydraulic cylinders (often at the main cage A and C pillar points) and an externally accessible airline  - they make quick work a breeze
    • Maximum Attack has entered the chat
    • That is porn and I wish I could do it easily on my streeter.
    • Yes there is a front and back insertion point on each side, each point is tubed with supports into the car and tied to the cage/ floor mount point
×
×
  • Create New...