Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

We are in the process of designing bolt-on intercooler set-ups for the RB25 and RB20 engines.

We have been told there is not much on the market that doesn't require cutting ect.

What do you guys think about that? Would you be interested in purchasing?

Just trying to gauge some interest so any thoughts are welcome!

  • 2 weeks later...

Hey guys,

We are in the process of designing bolt-on intercooler set-ups for the RB25 and RB20 engines.

We have been told there is not much on the market that doesn't require cutting ect.

What do you guys think about that? Would you be interested in purchasing?

Just trying to gauge some interest so any thoughts are welcome!

I would like to see someone recreate the Trust Turnflow intercooler because there is a demand for them and I think they were discontinued some time back .

In my mind these are the best solution for those that don't want the pipe work going through the inner guard and back over the top of the engine to its inlet pipe . It leaves the engine bay looking totally standard so less for the whallopers to bite you over .

Also if anyone peers in through the front at the tubes all they do see is vertical ones which could be easily mistaken for radiator or AC condenser tubes especially if its black .

As for the vertical tubes , I don't believe it matters to cooling (with the same external area) if the tubes are vertical or horizontal . What would make a HUGE difference is the number of flow paths with vertical tubes because there are so many more of them than you can fit in a horizontal flow core . It stands to reason that the more tubes you have the less flow restriction there is so ultimately the vertical tube core will flow more all else being equal .

The other thing is that we NEED the airspeed through the tubes to be low to give the air molecules more time to reject the heat given in the pumping process . If you don't think this is the case then ask heat exchanger manufacturers why they fill the tubes with "turbulators" and why more thin tubes , to a degree , tend to work better that fewer deeper section ones . The thinner tubes and turbulators force the air/water/etc to slow down and tumble which reduces boundary layer flow . You get better heat rejection AND flow by having more tubes rather than longer tubes - quote Corky Bell .

By comparison a horizontal tube IC of the same dimensions has fewer longer tubes and that long tube to return the air back to the standard nearside plumbing . On the Trust style "Turnflow" the bottom collector tank replaces the return pipe so its all good .

If I was going to make intercolers for R32/33/34 I'd do the Turnflow style and like trust use two suitably sized cores side by side with custom tanks . If suitable core were available it would be quite easy to fabricate and depending on how many tubes you had it may even be possible to have the core a little thinner minimising the reo bar trimming - which most would prefer not to do if possible .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Saruthewhite hasn’t been on our site since November 2016 sorry mate
    • Note when Duncan says that, he means "when you're not using the correct lifting points on the sills, because you want to work on the sills. A 2 post hoist is not appropriate for everything anyway, and working on the sills is a good example of that, because the arms go under ths sills anyway. You're better off finding another way to support the car off the ground. Beyond that everything else D said is correct. Only the dedicated jacking points are the correct place to lift. Anywhere else is incorrect, extra caution and awareness must be used, etc etc.
    • Your off site links didn't work for me, and in any case it is easier for forum members if you post the pic directly either as an attachment or a link so the information is all in one place. That aside, the sills are the correct place to lift the car, whether with the factory jack or a hoist. Yes you should use rubber blocks with a slit for the seam on a hoist to avoid bending the pinch weld (where yours is currently bent, just bend it back if possible eg vicegrips), and be aware of the height you need in the blocks to clear any sill extensions to the hoist arms as it lifts If what you are doing needs access to the sills, the rear subframe bush would also be strong and secure. I'm not sure what you mean by sidemember (maybe same part I mean by sills) but be careful that your front support point is not too far back as the car is very front heavy and could overbalance.
    • Here's my first iteration - white duct tape so color is off, but this is just a straight line across the bonnet lip. From a geometry standpoint, this is probably closest to what a GTR has. Next up is some $5 white pearl vinyl and some rubber door sill trim, applied to the BACK of the bonnet lip. It's more accurate placement to the GTR, but also follows the body lines on this setup a bit more. Couple more pics on this config incoming: Again, a $5 vinyl and rubber job, it's  POC still and not how I'm gonna run this part. But one thing I'll note is that the black trim does need to "straighten out" a bit, and instead of going completely along the line of the bonnet lip, might be better suited to wrap over the "horns" of the bonnet lip, giving it a less aggressive curve up at the ends.  The correct way to do this would be to paint it body-matched and then decide how you want to make the black line. If you used paint or a pinstripe, you could have the black line go straight to the corner of the headlight where the rubber strip typically meets the headlight on a GTR.   Hope this helps!
×
×
  • Create New...