Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I currently have a R33 GTR with a Autronic SMC ECU and Autronic CDI.

I have purchased a new engine loom as the one in the car is a total mess!!!

I know that I need to hack into the new loom to install the Autronic ECU and CDI but was wanting to know peoples opinions on a Power FC over what I currently have?

I am only looking at the Power FC as i wont have to hack into the new loom as it is a plug in.

If I was to keep the Autronic, is there any other option to modify the loom rather than destroying the new one?

Cheers in advance

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/372623-best-ecu-option-for-r33-gtr/
Share on other sites

Rewire the whole thing, all problems will be solved, including the fact that the factory wiring is crap by now

I will be rewiring either way, I have already purchased a brand new genuine loom

Just need to work out what ecu I should go for as per my first post

It depends on what you are using the car for, what mods you have and your budget.

Waste of time if you only bought a new engine harness as it's usually the power harness on the left hand side that is the worst

The car is already modified enough for what I am wanting to achieve out of it.

347awkw

Car will see more track days than street driving, it is not a daily.

Reason why i purchased a whole new engine harness is because it has been hacked into in a lot of places, have been told the easiest and cleanest way is to replace with new. Which is what I am doing

Both ECU's will do the job but I imagine the SMC would have a few more input/ouput options for things you might want to add later

Is there any other option of how to install the SMC? I prefer not to hack into the new loom if I dont have too . . .

I have a few spare female GTR ecu connectors you could have $20 + postage or pickup just wire it into the autronic and plug it in.... its how i do all my wire ins..... allows the cars loom to remain intact so it can be returned to std in minutes.

Dont want this to look like im hocking parts, just a suggestion.

Keep the SMC its a great ecu, different but great.

Both ECU's will do the job but I imagine the SMC would have a few more input/ouput options for things you might want to add later

Ye as Dan said, depends on what you want ultimately.

If you want to log a few extra things. Keep the Autronic.

If you don't then the PFC will also be fine.

Most circuit GTR's in Vic that are still street driven on occasion all use a PFC.

When you go out & out racecar, extra logging can indeed be handy etc.

You'll need to decide/talk to your tuner & what not.

I have a few spare female GTR ecu connectors you could have $20 + postage or pickup just wire it into the autronic and plug it in.... its how i do all my wire ins..... allows the cars loom to remain intact so it can be returned to std in minutes.

Dont want this to look like im hocking parts, just a suggestion.

Keep the SMC its a great ecu, different but great.

A little off topic Trent. I have the same ECU and I am interested in one of these ECU connectors for my car (33 GTR). Is there any chance I could grab one off you. I tried to send you a PM but It didnt have the little tab for to do so. pinch.gif

A little off topic Trent. I have the same ECU and I am interested in one of these ECU connectors for my car (33 GTR). Is there any chance I could grab one off you. I tried to send you a PM but It didnt have the little tab for to do so. pinch.gif

yeah i looked yesterday and have one left. drop me an email and i will pack it up.

yeah the autronic is a great ECU and the CDI is great too. there's also nothing wrong with a power FC. both of them if tuned well will run the car beautifully. you could swap to the power FC and sell your current autronic set-up and probably not lose any money in the process. power FC is great on a street car, they run very nicely.

really up to you. a patch look for the autronic is a fine idea though too.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • find it funny everyone claims different fuel chains, do different things with their fuel blah blah blah. We don't have that many fuel terminals in Australia. The fuel tanker trucks drive into the terminal, fill up, and drive directly to the service station and dump out. The majority of fuel you get, is coming out of the same terminals. The variation is actually at the individual service stations and how good their tanks are, as well as how much turn over they actually have. Older fuel stations, that haven't had their tanks replaced are going to end up with the worst fuel. Also a lot of older stations have shit design, and shit maintenance, and end up with more water absorption into the tank. This is when you then get a bad batch of fuel. Other shit things happen, like tanker drivers have a f**k up, and starting to unload the wrong compartment on their truck into the wrong tank. 
    • This one?? In other news: I cannot tell the difference between my red MX5 with the silver grey hard top......... and the Ferrari 599XX EVO, they might as well be twins, well.......apart from the big wang hanging off the back of the Ferrari...🤔🤣, without the wing they are identical   
    • Turn it into the pride flag 
    • I think you'll find we're confused about what you were trying to do and how you were doing it. I would have thought that block rigidity was something you measured while loading the block in beam or in torsion, and that you would do so before and after grout filling, to see if putting material in there created a "composite" construction with the expected rigidity increase. Notwithstanding that the true function of grout is less about gross rigidity than local (ie preventing bore deflection/splitting and tying the bores to the main bearing locations a little better, etc etc). It is nearly impossible to follow your description of what you've done without closing ones eyes and making "aliens" hand shapes in front of oneself to try to follow the manipulations you've made. It's still unclear to me what you were trying to prove.
×
×
  • Create New...