Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

No, below 60% i run low boost, above that i press high boost.... Only picked up the car Monday so i am yet to try high boost.... Am up to E54 or something....

aahh

my boost is going to be controlled through the Haltech solenoid so its going to adjust it accordingly...

really interested to see when its all finished

  • Replies 61
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Would still very much like to see some MPHs out of these cars to see where it all sits, to date there isn't for any of them.

Thats because MPH readings are over in 13 seconds... Dragging the average uleh commodore isn't that appealing. Sprinting is where its at.

I'll do the 1/4 mile one day, but i actually have to get my car back together before i can do any event lol.

:yes:

However your approach to corners is a little different then most :P

Nothing wrong with that. As long as it has corners you can take at speed thats all that counts. :P Unlike events like power cruise :ph34r:

Thats because MPH readings are over in 13 seconds...

With "360rwkw" it should be well and truly over in 11 :)

But then you did say "at the hubs", so at least you get that it's not really "rwkw" :thumbsup:

With "360rwkw" it should be well and truly over in 11 :)

But then you did say "at the hubs", so at least you get that it's not really "rwkw" :thumbsup:

We like to use a hub dyno because nothing such as tyre pressure, tyre grip, wheels size, wheel width, tyre temperature etc etc can effect the outcome. Its always the same, no ifs or butts.

If you use Temperature correction then the results are as real as they come. YES there is a difference between power at the hubs and power at the wheels. Personally i dont care if its making less than XX kW @ the wheels.

Personally i want the most accurate figure possible so the tuner can do his job even better. The torque accuracy of the hub dyno is second to none. It calculates diff ratio and will give you the actual torque created at the flywheel by the engine.

MPH times really aren't an accurate way of proving or dis proving a car/engine setup. Far too many variables. Different drivers, different cars, different suspension setups, different tyres, reaction times the list goes on.

Just because a car makes a gazillion kW on a dyno doesn't make it the be all and end all. But on the flip side a car that only produces a 'low' power output doesn't make it a car that can't perform and put serious numbers down.

MPH never lies, the slight variables only ever have a 1-2mph effect at best as we are not talking tightly set-up 9 second cars where things like tyre size will actually make a difference to peak RPM(limiter avoiding) and so on. MPH has called the bluff many times over the years on here and will no doubt continue to do so for many years to come :)

Group dyno days also work in the same fashion (and the same excuses for not going come up) - It's always a laugh to see a car having a "bad" day when its 50rwkw down for "no apparent reason"... Or should I say, suddenly making realistic figures.

I've also seen @ some dyno days, the operator playing with the old temp correction trick for their own cars so they make more than anyone else's :)

Either way I wasn't having a go at you - you say it's @ the hubs and not "rwkw" like other claim - that is a damn good thing.

It sets realistic expectations for other users so they suddenly don't come along thinking you can make XXX"rwkw" from a set-up that simply put, will never make that.

Then we end up with threads here "Why am I down on power", "Is my tune shit" - list goes on. Other users face palm and then such threads end up a lot of time going nowhere.

With "360rwkw" it should be well and truly over in 11 :)

But then you did say "at the hubs", so at least you get that it's not really "rwkw" :thumbsup:

Mines rwkw :D

MPH never lies, the slight variables only ever have a 1-2mph effect at best as we are not talking tightly set-up 9 second cars where things like tyre size will actually make a difference to peak RPM(limiter avoiding) and so on. MPH has called the bluff many times over the years on here and will no doubt continue to do so for many years to come :)

Group dyno days also work in the same fashion (and the same excuses for not going come up) - It's always a laugh to see a car having a "bad" day when its 50rwkw down for "no apparent reason"... Or should I say, suddenly making realistic figures.

I've also seen @ some dyno days, the operator playing with the old temp correction trick for their own cars so they make more than anyone else's :)

Either way I wasn't having a go at you - you say it's @ the hubs and not "rwkw" like other claim - that is a damn good thing.

It sets realistic expectations for other users so they suddenly don't come along thinking you can make XXX"rwkw" from a set-up that simply put, will never make that.

Then we end up with threads here "Why am I down on power", "Is my tune shit" - list goes on. Other users face palm and then such threads end up a lot of time going nowhere.

you done?

I'll be done, when you are done claming rwkw** for hub results and misleading users.

(**as proven to be inaccurate to the tune of 40-60kw, by other users who've done back to back tests).

That's cause he sets it up right. He even have you pointers to do the same in a thread a lil while back :thumbsup:

Claims? Other users have proven it with evidence! That is not a claim.

For the love of god Ash, don't go onto the pommie site. Had one guy the other day '550-600 HP "at the fly" when he hadn't even stuck it on a dyno.

You will have a heart attack and die I'm sure of it.

That's cause he sets it up right. He even have you pointers to do the same in a thread a lil while back :thumbsup:

Claims? Other users have proven it with evidence! That is not a claim.

All my tunes have been done in the same set up mode, ramp rate and temp probe on as what Trentuses, sorry to burst your bubble.

One time it was tuned and made over 400kw however that was due to the temp probe not beingon thanks to the last user in the dyno taking it off

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hmm. Yes. I should have been clearer. 1000s for Haltech, for extra headroom. 725s for Nistune. You might even be OK with 640s, but if the possible power ends up much more than 300 rwkW you will run out of headroom on the 640s. That would probably be OK and a signal to not push it to that sort of power with Nistune anyway. At that level you probably do want to be thinking about engine protection functions. Oh, and all of that presumes 98 only, not E85. Well....the 1000s would allow you to run E85 at ~300rwkW territory, again, maybe sort of running out of headroom. Hard to tell with E85 - depends on the tuner as to how rich they like to set it up.
    • Yes.  The only scenario I can imagine when the answer isn't yes, is if you drive like there is highway patrol behind you at all times.  If your car currently runs, enjoy it and keep saving. Better costs more, keep saving until you can budget the better ECU. It's worth it.  Nope. Plenty of us making >300kw on unopened motors. Mine is unopened and makes about 350kw if I turn everything up, its fine (lots of caveats here, how the car will be used/abused, how long you expect the engine to last between rebuilds, how has the engine been maintained prior to coming into your ownership, etc etc).   
    • Sorry just wanting to clarify, at this power goal, which should I be going? Also, More info regarding suspension, the rear upper camber arms were used to get the camber back to i believe around -0.5 ~ -1 degree (@ Road and Race in Rydalmere), I forgot the exact figure, but ALOT less camber than what it came originally which was like -2.5degrees. Are the traction arms still recommended? The bilsteins from SydneyKid, they've got 400lb/in fronts & 275/in in the rear, revalved to his specs. Intercooler, I'm just having a look at some on Rakuten.jp and some other japanese sites. Might get something from back there, GReddy, Blitz or HPI, all crossflow. Looking at roughly $450-$500 AUD + shipping... Theres not many choices except that chinese branded Justjap unless you go for blitz return flow. Yeah, only downside with Haltech is the price ahhaha, so expensive, and with all the sensors if I go that route... $$$$$ yeesh. Are headstuds/gaskets needed for <300akw?
    • Haltech fanboi reporting in. Buy the Haltech! 
    • You can try shoving a borescope down there to see what's up.
×
×
  • Create New...