Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

http://steamunpowered.eu/agreed-to-originbf3-eula-ea-may-collect-and-share-your-data/

Might change some people's minds I guess. Not that keen on d/l Origin now myself.

Edited by DivHunter

EULA don't actually hold any legal weight anywhere really, they are never tested in court because they would fail. However, their information gathering and sharing provisions are a worry.

But no longer for me, BF3 was a total waste of bandwidth. I don't pay for map packs, especially ones claiming to be new games.

Cancelled my pre-order, uninstalled BF3 + Origin.

Jacob don't be a sook you got owned at BF3 so you raged and uninstalled (comment not designed to start a flaming war just pointing out possibilities)

BF3 is a completely new game engine to BC2

Frostbite 1.0

Frostbite debuted in 2008 with Battlefield: Bad Company. It features HDR Audio, which adjusts different types of sounds' loudness and lets players hear important sounds clearly even if there are other noises being generated (for example, gunshot sounds are always louder than in-game music; the in-game music will lower in volume while shots are being fired), and Destruction 1.0, which allows the player to destroy certain objects, like walls.

Frostbite 1.5

The second version of Frostbite debuted with Battlefield 1943 in 2009. It improved on the in-game destruction capabilities with Destruction 2.0, allowing the player to destroy entire buildings instead of just walls. In 2010, DICE released Battlefield: Bad Company 2 using this version of the engine, which was the first game to bring Frostbite Engine to the Windows platform. The Windows version of the game has minor DX11 shader support; consequently, it doesn't take full advantage of the entire API. The multiplayer component of Medal of Honor also uses this version of the engine, though with limited in-game destruction capabilities.

Frostbite 2

A demonstration of quasi-realtime radiosity from the Frostbite 2 engine.

The next generation of Frostbite will debut with Battlefield 3. It will take full advantage of the DirectX 11 API and 64-bit processors,[4] with no support for DirectX 9 (nor, therefore, Windows XP).[5] It will also feature enhanced in-game destruction with Destruction 3.0, creating more refined physics than its predecessor. Additionally an important distinction on its naming is that Frostbite 2 is not called Frostbite 2.0.[6]

DICE has given several presentations on advances in their rendering technology:

source

But no longer for me, BF3 was a total waste of bandwidth. I don't pay for map packs, especially ones claiming to be new games.

Cancelled my pre-order, uninstalled BF3 + Origin.

LOL NOOB RAGE.

GG at judging it on it's beta you r tard. I thought it was a POS the first day, but it's really grown on me, and shows how far they've come since BC2 in terms of both gameplay and visuals. That said I've had to drop my voltages on my cards as well as the core clocks on them as it thrashes them as hard as Furmark, first app I've seen to do that. Kept having hard lockups until I did, and both cards sit on 63-69c!

I can't wait for the full game even more now

agree Bozo i dropped my CPU from 4.5ghz back to stock mainly due to cooling but in the game my cpu load is very high

i don't mind origin and battlelog

if you remember with BF2 if you crashed mid game you didn't receive your ranks and rewards with battlelog as soon as its awarded its on the website

Whats your battelog name Madaz? Mine's sherbert86.

Sorta considering buying a second 6950 over the next couple of months, I reckon it'll be pretty awesome to run this game on full graphics :)

I notice that my GPU sits on 100% load, 100% of the time with this game. CPU usage is about 70% average.

LOL NOOB RAGE.

GG at judging it on it's beta you r tard. I thought it was a POS the first day, but it's really grown on me, and shows how far they've come since BC2 in terms of both gameplay and visuals. That said I've had to drop my voltages on my cards as well as the core clocks on them as it thrashes them as hard as Furmark, first app I've seen to do that. Kept having hard lockups until I did, and both cards sit on 63-69c!

I can't wait for the full game even more now

If what they've regurgitated as the open beta was a closed alpha I'd let it slide.

Please enlighten us, what part of the gameplay has improved since BC2?

Also, my rage is pro.

Edited by DivHunter

Cpd - are they not allowing any more downloads?

Div Hunter - I'm not 100 percent sure what new things you are looking for, I have bc2 its ok I got bored with it a few months after getting it (the same will probably happen with bf3 also)

There seems to be a lot of emphasis put on team play I personally love the flash lights, lasers, don't like rockets but hey you can't love everything

Remember this is 1 map 1 gametype we will have coop modes also

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • H2 (for cars) will never happen. It's not reasonable for any number of reasons. It's also not reasonable for almost all of the industrial uses that the fanbois say that it will be used for, again for a large number of reasons. There are some cases where it will be good. But, even those will be massively hampered by the economics. The only way that H2 can be economic is if we somehow manage to get from where we are to the other side of the economic-valley-of-death in which no-one can operate. You need there to be sufficient renewable generated electricity to be available so that it is effectively free. Once you are there, you can do whatever the hell you want and hang the efficiency. But until you get there, the ever diminishing value of electricity makes it harder and harder to encourage businesses to build the new generation capacity, and they will simply stop investing in generation projects. (I kinda think there needs to be just government money spent on building the required capacity in a non-commercial way, similar to how the first fossil fueled grids were built, as national-government owned utilities. And probably some nuclear in there to start. But this all should have started 10-15 years ago to avoid the chasm of death that we face right now). Synth fuels will be much more likely, but will only occur is there is at least some renewable H2 production, because you need H2 to do it. And you need stacks of free (or at least extraordinarily cheap) energy because assembling molecules back into fuels is exactly the opposite process to burning the fuel, and the reason we burn fuels is because there is so much energy squeezed into each molecule. So you're somewhat subject to the same economic valley of death problem as above anyway. That is unless people are willing to pay the current equivalent of $5 or $6 per litre of petrol-ish liquid fuels. Can you imagine it? The squealing at $2 now is bad enough.
    • This is so cool. Get a dashcam that records audio and hopefully you'll catch it.  Maybe there's a brand or some kind of markings on the back ? Are the pics hand drawn? I love it so much.
    • Hahaha yep, point(s) taken. I just like seeing different things and an EV in an R32 is pretty different. I'm not on the EV band wagon, I'm waiting for synthetic fuels or hydrogen personally. 
    • I mean it's probably likely that people overestimate their skills in dialling in a setup and noticing the changes. I had SK shocks and springs, and added heavier springs and got them revalved by Sydney Shocks to suit based upon what I told them I wanted the car to handle like. I got back a completely different feeling set of shocks, which probably (?) feel great on track but holy hell are they rough on tram tracks and the like. The shock dyno actually looks pretty similar to Shockworks (from what I can surmise from a screenshot of a youtube video - and my dyno printout...) Truth be told I doubt I'd be any faster or slower with either setup, or camber/castor combination. I also had whiteline eccentric castor bushes up front of my R34. I removed them and put in poly non-adjustable ones to soothe my OCD (nobody ever set the castor the same side to side, and it'd be near impossible to do) and be happy the wheel is centered in the well now for clearance reasons. Yes I wanted it to move 1mm 'back' :p I've effectively set my castor back to stock, negating all the benefits of that which is supposedly massive. I've probably also altered toe and camber in a negative (detrimental) way. I can't tell any difference steering the car.
×
×
  • Create New...