Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 234
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

When BF2 came out I used NVIDIA 7800gtx Sli. One card burnt out pretty quick, sold the other & have since used ATI cards. From 2600xfire, 3650xfire, 4870, 5770, now running 2gb 6950 with 6970 bios upgrade. BF3 ran smoothly on the beta, looking forward to running the game on ultra settings. For the price Ati shits over Nvidia counterparts (in my opinion).

Hi PC enjoy f**king around with all that shit mentioned up there ^^^. I perfer to play the game without having to play with the bits inside my machine first!

No need to get ansty PC folk, console people get that a PC will run the game better, its not even a question. But sadly it has to be the RIGHT PC with all the RIGHT bits, to that the common non IT savy people say....f**k that right in the ear.

Hi PC enjoy f**king around with all that shit mentioned up there ^^^. I perfer to play the game without having to play with the bits inside my machine first!

No need to get ansty PC folk, console people get that a PC will run the game better, its not even a question. But sadly it has to be the RIGHT PC with all the RIGHT bits, to that the common non IT savy people say....f**k that right in the ear.

Console runs min spec, so the 'right' PC to run better than any console can be bought off the shelf at any store that sells PCs, even Aldi.

Also I thoroughly enjoy f**king around with PCs, just like cars. Are you exceptionally perturbed, acquaintance?

Console runs min spec, so the 'right' PC to run better than any console can be bought off the shelf at any store that sells PCs, even Aldi.

Also I thoroughly enjoy f**king around with PCs, just like cars. Are you exceptionally perturbed, acquaintance?

Why would I be mad you concurred with my sentiment exactly? You and many others, like f**king around with PCs so you do, and enjoy the benifits. I, and many others do NOT enjoy f**king around with PCs (example I have TWO PCs in for repair right now)and are happy to put up with lower settings (like I would notice anyway) for the ease of knowing when I put the disk in the machine the game will work. I promise you in my case the ALDI computer would not work, I am amzing at busting computers doing seemingly normal stuff, and there is always a f**king driver or somthing missing.

I for one can see the bonus of a PC if you are capable, the performance is worth it if you know how to look after it. If you dont know how to look after it you are better of with the console.

It only seems to be the PC guys that get all nerd ragey about it and feel the need to bring it up at every oppourtunity.

Maybe it's all the nerd rage from console users when they are told that consoles have set back gaming 5-10 years.

If you seriously can't tell the difference between BF3 console and BF3 PC you have some kind of disability.

The consoles can't run 1920x1080 or for console people 'Full HD' as they would run unplayably slow. They were already doing this in Black Ops and earlier.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Duh... to answer my own silly question, it's actually described in the FSM... ...400 pages away at the end of the manual, for RB25DE/DET signal descriptions, it cites the TPSwitch signal action, is dependent on the TPSensor value ~ this tends to infer the builtin POT voltage signal is the primary, and the switches are fallback/secondary should the POT fail/TPSensor signal lost (and switch alone with no TPSensor signal allows for base idle speed setting).... makes sense... they (TPS units) used to fail/wear the POT with time, they're not exactly built to last ~ having the switch as a redundancy gets around this...(or, it's less likely both signals would be lost as they're on different power rails)... and of course wrt RB26DETT, you have to electrically disconnect the IACV solenoid from the harness, to defeat idle air control...  
    • Dose is unaware just how much fun 145-150kw would be in a 2.5L NC MX5. It would be one of the most fun things to drive to ever grace SAU.
    • Same thought crossed my mind ~ depends on how one connotes 'stalling'...ie; gets a rough/stumbling idle as it get warm until it stalls... or... idles ok and simply falls-over when it gets to temp... ...you can test the whole circuit with a couple of resistors ...unplug coolant temp sensor, bridge terminals with a 2K7 resistor (ECU will do cold start), or with engine warm bridge with a 330R resistor (ECU will consider engine to be at normal operating temp)...it's a quick way to check wiring integrity/ECU response when you don't have a multimeter handy ...
    • They also make them with the motor mounted on the side 
    • Just be warned that that turbo will not be a direct re-fit to the car. The exhaust housing is, of course, in the same place. It has to be - it's bolted to the exhaust manifold. So the dump will fit up. But the centre housing is not as long, so the comp housing will move backwards. This will affect both the turbo inlet and the outlet. There is fab work that needs to be done. Yes. it has one, it should have one. Paper gasket.
×
×
  • Create New...