Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I bought the 5in Venom cat and had it welded in (no flanges) as I am not planning to remove it. I have a 3in system looking for about 300 -330kw from my RB30. We need a cat for low volume certification these days but the certifiers do not do comprehensive exhaust gas analysis - I suspect these 100 cell metal cats would not pass - would be interested if anyone has been through a test with one.

whats the point in spending all that money and running a high flow cat if it doesnt meet emissions? seriously, just bolt in a standard cat when you have an inspection then spend $50 and get a decat.

recon a minimum of 300 cells for emmissions and get it as close to the turbo as possible, can change it to a 100 cell if you want when you get your certificate for the engine

+1

whats the point in spending all that money and running a high flow cat if it doesnt meet emissions? seriously, just bolt in a standard cat when you have an inspection then spend $50 and get a decat.

The point is to avoid a $10k fine if you get caught without a cat at all. Compared to a $200 outlay of a 100cell hiflow cat that will provide almost no restriction. You cannot get a fine for having a cat that probably wont meet emissions standards (100 cell cat).

i dont have a stock system and its on a vl so the whole exhaust is custom made

It all depends on the impact of you failing. If it costs nothing and you can go again later sure try the hiflow cat but if it costs you or you failing causes you to loose rego then you should definitely fit a 300 cell cat and then change afterwards.

The point is to avoid a $10k fine if you get caught without a cat at all. Compared to a $200 outlay of a 100cell hiflow cat that will provide almost no restriction. You cannot get a fine for having a cat that probably wont meet emissions standards (100 cell cat).

Show me proof that anyone here or elsewhere in AU has been fined the full amount of 10K for not running a cat converter.

Pete was stating that its better to run a std cat than a high flow - which probably wont pass.

Show me proof that anyone here or elsewhere in AU has been fined the full amount of 10K for not running a cat converter.

Pete was stating that its better to run a std cat than a high flow - which probably wont pass.

Why run the risk of a fine for no cat?? To save $200 and 2-3kw?

Yes I also have said multiple times in this thread to run a standard cat to pass the emissions test. I was suggesting changing to a hiflow 100 cell cat after the emissions test.

Pete was stating that its better to run a std cat than a high flow - which probably wont pass.

exactly, its just a waste of money. the only way youre gonna get fined for not having a cat is if youre stupid enough to go through an inspection without one

exactly, its just a waste of money. the only way youre gonna get fined for not having a cat is if youre stupid enough to go through an inspection without one

You may not be aware but in Sydney they often have defect stations. Little outposts setup by police where police will pull import cars and other cars on the street into these stations, put them on a hoist and defect everything not standard.

You may not be aware but in Sydney they often have defect stations. Little outposts setup by police where police will pull import cars and other cars on the street into these stations, put them on a hoist and defect everything not standard.

im not sure what your point is? Again, pete's reply was that a highflow is a waste of money, as it would fail the epa test and if you went through an inspection without a cat, then expect a fine.

Here in SA, you only need the one defect to be sent for a full inspection (can be a few things like noise etc) and then fined just for being defected

im not sure what your point is? Again, pete's reply was that a highflow is a waste of money, as it would fail the epa test and if you went through an inspection without a cat, then expect a fine.

Here in SA, you only need the one defect to be sent for a full inspection (can be a few things like noise etc) and then fined just for being defected

I don't think you understood what I meant. These are EPA setup stations. Police bring in drivers, EPA pulls out the book for your car and gets you down for everything not standard. You will cop a fine for running a cat not meeting standards, not a fine for running NO CAT at all. That is the difference. Its a grey area. They have hoists to get cars up. Ive seen one setup on james ruse drive near rose hill. Not a pretty site.

You may not be aware but in Sydney they often have defect stations. Little outposts setup by police where police will pull import cars and other cars on the street into these stations, put them on a hoist and defect everything not standard.

I don't think we have them in WA, the only Police setup stations I've seen are your typical RBT buses & drug test.

Also from watching some old news, you guys also have some kind of special Police task force who's solo purpose is to pull cars (mostly imports) over & defect them, I think they are called operation Tapan or something?

Again we don't seem to have those in WA (thank god!)

I don't think we have them in WA, the only Police setup stations I've seen are your typical RBT buses & drug test.

Also from watching some old news, you guys also have some kind of special Police task force who's solo purpose is to pull cars (mostly imports) over & defect them, I think they are called operation Tapan or something?

Again we don't seem to have those in WA (thank god!)

dont count on it being that way for much longer. . .usually what happens in the east makes it way here to W.A (aka Wait Awhile) eventually

it's all good arguing about this on a internet forum but know one here can give you a straight answer (or at least the one you're looking for) so email venom an see what they say. :thumbsup:

good luck to you sir :)

george told me my best bet would be a factory BF xr6turbo cat for the emissions test. then change it over down the track.however after talkignt o him a bit more any 200cell plus cat should do the job as long as its ceramic. so im thinking going the catco ceramic cat and then putting my decat back in after the test.

im not sure what your point is? Again, pete's reply was that a highflow is a waste of money, as it would fail the epa test and if you went through an inspection without a cat, then expect a fine.

I understand you now, drive around with a decat pipe, if you get pulled over and cop a defect then put a factory cat back in when you go in for an inspection.

What about this scenario:

Car accident where the car is undriveable and the insurance people come and do an inspection of the car. They could argue that your car is not roadworthy and therefore not covered by insurance.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...