Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the kit, wheels, interior and mild engine work... all of the mods combined make the car special.. alot of people throw stuff at cars that dont really go well together... IMHO all mods on this car complement each other and work very well together and thats what makes it special.. the way in which the mods have been carried out all fit in perfectly with each other... not just modded for the sake of modding it

More Photos:

http://geoff.yourweb.com.au/gallery/album13

Taken with my trusty old Canon FT QL and some sensia slide film. Scanned using a Frontier lab (blame them for the shithouse colour balance I don't yet have the software to fix) but take a squizz anyway :D

What's so special? How about a custom widebody that keeps all the original lines?

you have obviously never seen this car in real life have you?? lots of people with wide bodies dont bother to get the guards and stuff to meet the head lights, they dont bother getting the rear quarters to meet the tail lights, they merely hang them off the edge so to speak which in my eyes looks good but Greg didnt like that so he made sure everything blended in. Most people to be honest dont even notice its a wide body which in my eyes proves how well everything works. If you knew what sort of panels went into making this kit you would understand, but i dont have the time to type it up. The car is 12cm wider overall and is actually wider than a GTR.......

RB26 S15 :P:);) Now that would be nice, cant wait to drive it :D:D:D

Ido09s, I've met Greg, seen the car in real life and spent over 6hours with it while it was photographed for SPEED magazine. I know what you're talking about, and that's my point. Greg kept the original character lines intact when he built the car while adding some serious girth (enough to get the track as wide as an R33 GT-R)

whats special about the s15 apart from the body kit

ido09s, I'm assuming that Sonic was replying to junkie13's post (as above).

I regret not having taken a better look at it myself now :slap: , it did look good from a distance...

I've added my photos from the day to the SnS Gallery. They're not that special, but they're there.

Nick T.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I should note too as I have all 4 wheel speed inputs to the emtron I now have the emtron controlling the attessa solenoid for 4wd/traction and launch control strategies. 
    • It works quite well with the adjustibility within each of the programs of the turbolamik. Essentially p1 is drive and lockup comes on like a normal driver.  But in program 7 I have customised it to not request the lockup clutch to engage until something like 6500/7 when slip was the lowest. 
    • Yep, I like that. The tags are only on the first post of a thread and we don't get huge numbers of new threads. Also, I plan to add some more report types and we could have a member report type like 'review tags' then members could flag if they thought a topic wasn't tagged correctly.  No way man, I dig the input. Thanks! 
    • It's a valid thought. There's not exactly that functionality already (when creating a thread) - that's where the OP can use/create any tag they want. We'd have to come up with a way for the user to request their tags get reviewed or something. Otherwise the mods would have to review every new post's tags (for those that have them, anyway). There's kind of that functionality already exists to some extent, post facto of starting the thread, where the OP or any other user could report the post to admins, and request that tags get reviewed. We could do this already, and any user could already have made such a request. To make it a part of the forum proper, it would require an initial and an ongoing education programme, so that people know that it's a thing. OP based tagging/request for review would also require at least some (probably most) of the user base to be told that it's a thing they can do. Both of these things probably wouldn't spread too far and/or get used very much. If it was the standard approach on a lot of different sites, then it might do, because people would be used to it. Prank's approach to this differs from my original thought, by leaning into tagging. Which is fine - it's possibly better than what I originally suggested. In fact, I just went to the R32 GTR wiring diagram thread and added tags, including "Library". That's probably a good way to use tags and the idea of a library. We just have to drag together an (organised!) index of threads or posts that have that tag. I have yet to do any of my own follow up by pursuing worthy threads and posts and reporting/marking/tagging them for the library, such as the @Sydneykid stuff I was talking about, and possibly any amount of @Lithium 's and others' posts. At least if I tag them Library, we'll have a start.   Back to @Wazmond's idea as it relates to @PranK's, we might have some sort of a list of tags that are already used to scrape for this library. I'm not entirely sure how that would be presented or used, particularly if it got long. But it's yet another idea!   cheers
    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
×
×
  • Create New...