Jump to content
SAU Community

How Much Boost?


Room42
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am in the process of building an rb2530 with 2 stock r33 s2 turbo's on a custom manifold. How much boost would each turbo run before the z32 afm hit 5.2? I'm going to suck through one afm. They will be running off 3 cylinders each.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

10-12psi if they are stock turbo's (non-steel wheels) or you will run the risk of damaging them/shortening their life.....

EDIT: not sure on the AFM

Edited by Shazza24
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, I wouldn't bother with the standard r33 turbos because they like to fly apart beyond 12psi.

It's kind of a waste bolting them on to just run 12psi. A single Garrett item with an internal gate would be far cheaper, easier, and a lot less mess under the bonnet.

I'd you're set on twins, get decent twins properly matched for performance vs early spool time.

But, a z32 and two standard turbos at 12psi wouldn't max a z32.

Just advice mate - you need to rethink you're strategy because what you're doing isn't going to be worthwhile, especially on a rb2530

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just advice mate - you need to rethink you're strategy because what you're doing isn't going to be worthwhile, especially on a rb2530

+1

The sheer cost and effort to get twin stock turbos onto a RB25 head is just not worth it for a start.

Let alone the failure risk and thus motor...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

im a fan of twins but this is ridiculous.

do it properly or not at all.

you can get proper twins or a proper single with the right money.

or you can go cheap and get twin chinas or a single china.

but this is too cheap lol..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i reckon your idea is crazy and risky and will give a crap result

but your engine

but i do think twin gt25's ECR33s will max a SINGLE z32 airflow meter

or come very close

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, they're supposed to be good for ~200rwkW each, which is a bit more than the Z32 meter will measure. It's just a question of whether you can drive one to produce 200rwkW with only 1.5 litres behind it.

If it were me doing bodgy cheap twins like this, I'd use some TDO4s off a WRX or something similar. They're a bit smaller than the RB25 turbos, will spool better, will run to higher boost if needed to make the flow&power.

Stilll a complete nightmare to do compared to the expected results though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am aware of the risk involved with ceramic turbos but as they wouldn't be seeing a high boost level with 2 of them this wont be an issue. My current turbo has been seeing 14-16 psi at least twice a day if not 20 times a day for 6 months and it's fine. That argument aside, there are some good reasons that I am doing this turbo setup. The cost of doing this is bugger all. Another stock turbo with lines is $150. A head flange and 2 t3 flanges cost me $100 from ebay. I'm getting all the pipe for the manifold and exhaust from work for free. I currently have one hks split dump that I've been using for a while now. I need another split dump or I could use the stock ones. The exhaust and manifold fabrication will cost nothing more than my good company and some drinks at a mates house. The water and oil line setup is another negligible cost. Intake piping is what it is. Silicone bends aren't that cheap but we all know what they are worth. Tuning is up to me. I'm going to tune the turbo setup on the current rb25det in the car and then swap it afterwards to the bigger motor. So it all comes in at less than $500. It will be fine aye. It will be neat and wont blow up :whistling: Also as far as effort goes its not a lot in my book. As the cost is so low that means less wages spent. To get a "proper" setup I would be looking at a minimum of $3500. That's more work in the end. It might sound crazy and risky to some but to me the work involved is easy and the cost is small. It might be a bit laggy? I guess we'll see. It will end up on the dyno after I have done most of the tuning so we'll see then. That's a couple of months off tho, busy with work and home and engine building as most of us are. At the end of the day if it all turns to shit all I would have lost is a small amount of money and a weekend or 2. Have faith peoples. I'm not some chinese whispering 20 year old. :yes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be laggy and the turbos will only run 12psi.

Why not go a gt3076 or bigger? simple and proven and possibly cheaper.

A bigger single would be the easy way out as far as install goes. I guess I'm doing it cos its cheap and fairly easy and a bit unique. Plus it would give me something to do that I'm interested in. I'm curious to see how it would go. If it turns out crap then a 6boost manifold and a gt3582r will end up on the 2530.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best post in whole thread! :thumbsup:

IIRC it was a pretty simple and direct question.

500hp seems to be about right. What sort of power are you chasing?

Whatever the engine/ turbo kit will do. I just pulled the head of the 30 and the bores are 86.05mm. I'm about to sus out the piston/bore tolerance and if its ok then its going to stay the way it is (stock). If it needs machining then forged pistons are going in. Even if it stays stock (or forged pistons) its getting a 3.4 stroker kit next year on the tenth of August (my birthday!). So the power level will vary depending on what work gets done to the engine for now. Either way it only has to last a year so I'll turn it up as much as reliably possible.

EDIT: I'm only running an intank walbro 341 for now so that may need replacing with something better as well.

Edited by Room42
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am aware of the risk involved with ceramic turbos but as they wouldn't be seeing a high boost level with 2 of them this wont be an issue. My current turbo has been seeing 14-16 psi at least twice a day if not 20 times a day for 6 months and it's fine. That argument aside, there are some good reasons that I am doing this turbo setup. The cost of doing this is bugger all. Another stock turbo with lines is $150. A head flange and 2 t3 flanges cost me $100 from ebay. I'm getting all the pipe for the manifold and exhaust from work for free. I currently have one hks split dump that I've been using for a while now. I need another split dump or I could use the stock ones. The exhaust and manifold fabrication will cost nothing more than my good company and some drinks at a mates house. The water and oil line setup is another negligible cost. Intake piping is what it is. Silicone bends aren't that cheap but we all know what they are worth. Tuning is up to me. I'm going to tune the turbo setup on the current rb25det in the car and then swap it afterwards to the bigger motor. So it all comes in at less than $500. It will be fine aye. It will be neat and wont blow up :whistling: Also as far as effort goes its not a lot in my book. As the cost is so low that means less wages spent. To get a "proper" setup I would be looking at a minimum of $3500. That's more work in the end. It might sound crazy and risky to some but to me the work involved is easy and the cost is small. It might be a bit laggy? I guess we'll see. It will end up on the dyno after I have done most of the tuning so we'll see then. That's a couple of months off tho, busy with work and home and engine building as most of us are. At the end of the day if it all turns to shit all I would have lost is a small amount of money and a weekend or 2. Have faith peoples. I'm not some chinese whispering 20 year old. :yes:

chances of getting it done for 500 are slim.. i predict at least 1k and ALOT of stuffing around..

Now considering you can get a 3076 for around 1 to 1.5k second hand that will bolt straight up to a 2.5 with minimal fuss, it will be much easier to work on and diagnose should any problems arise and it would probably kill your crazy setup ..sure it is something different and original but so is the gay mardigra and we dont go there

cool thread though..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well.... yes and perhaps no. It depends on what you mean by "spool". For most of us, the point that we would describe as where the turbo is "spooling" is the point where the wheel speed gets high enough for it to start making some boost. This is coincidentally around about the point where it starts making noise - hence the "spooling" sound. If that is what you mean, then no - the wastegate should still be shut at this point. The boost will still be way below the point where it should start opening. If, on the other hand, you mean "spool" as "reach full boost", then yes. At the point where the boost has reached target, then boost control has already started. The wastegate is already open, and has been for some time. Some short time, definitely, but still, some time. If you have no boost controller - just the wastegate actuator connected to the boost source, then you have a mechanical system working as a pressure balance. There is pressure on one side of the wastegate actuator's diaphragm from the spring, and pressure on the other side coming from the boost measurement location (the "source"). This is not a digital thing. The wastegate does not stay shut until the boost pressure reaches the spring "pressure". The spring will start to compress as soon as you start to apply any pressure onto it. This can be controlled somewhat by adding pre-load into the spring, but you cannot add enough preload to make it into a digital switch behaviour. The wastegate will crack open and start to leak exhaust out (and therefore not though the turbine) well before you reach the target boost pressure. Electronic (and some mechanical/pneumatic) boost controllers will act to prevent the boost source applying pressure to the actuator until just before you reach target boost, thus preventing the wastegate from creeping open. And some boost controllers will apply boost pressure on the spring side to further push it shut. And this can be be necessary because the exhaust pressure in the manifold also pushes on the wastegate valve and tries to open it and you cab get it leaking even without it being connected to the boost source.
    • A stand alone boost controller will not give you the control you need, unlike a modern ECU. Your boost will always naturally target the wastegate's opening pressure first, your controller then will allow you to add more boost as required.
    • I recently discovered that I could not remove the outer bolt on one of my rear UCAs. Looked like it was seized to the crush tube. It wasn't all that long since I had last had that arm out (I dunno exactly, but certainly <2 yrs), so I was a bit surprised. I thought I had stock bushes in the rear knuckles, so I ordered some new PU bushes and resigned myself to having to do some dismantlery....and some butchery. It was clear that the seized bush was going to need to have the bolt cut out of it and then possibly some more brutality after that. Upon getting the 3x arms on each side disconnected from the knuckles (with the exception of the seized one, of course), I discovered that I had in fact put PU bushes into the knuckles when I did the subframe conversion about 12-13 years ago. So, I say "Oh, good, I might not have to swap any of these others out". We set to work butchering the bolt out of the seized arm. Stainless blade in a big-arse Milwaukee recipro made short work of it, and also damaged the arm, which added a welding and grinding and painting step to the whole exercise. During the butchery it became clear that the bolt was not just seized but bent. Head scratching ensued, as it is hard to understand how that bolt could get bent. I did suffer a broken (stock) toe control arm on that side a few months ago, and drove some miles with some significant rear wheel self steer and lack of control, which probably was the cause. But it's still hard to understand how it would bend that bolt, rather than just bend the arm. But here's the start of the real discoveries. The crush tube was rusty as all shit. I mean seriously rusty. A little on the inside, contributing to the tube seizing to the bolt (along with the bend). But the outside had at least 2-3mm of compressed flaky iron oxide jammed in between the parent metal and the PU bush. This one was brutalised and still took some effort to get the PU off the crush tube. So I thought I'd inspect the others more closely. The one on the tension rod adjacent the bent one was first. I had to use a 2-jaw puller to get the crush tube out, and it took some effort. It came out looking like the first one. All 6 of them were the same, except for one that looked not too bad. Had some corrosion on it, but was mostly OK. There was also a significant amount of corrosion on the inner surfaces of the knuckles. They took some convincing with pointy tools to let go their grip on the inside of the holes they were in. There was no sign of the original (SuperPro) lube anywhere. I and my bro-in-law have never seen any crush tube end up looking like this. It was seriously like the car has spent time putting boats into the water at the boat ramp. So, it seems like the PU might have been bonded to the steel on both sides, which would have to make them work more like stock rubber bushes (where arm deflection results in twist inside the rubber). Despite this, I have never had cause to believe that they were so tightly bound up. The suspension moved up and down much as you'd expect. The car never made any noises in those bushes that would have led me to believe there was a problem. Maybe the rusty interfaces actually were "sliding". Anyway, lesson learnt. Even quiet, non-troublesome PU bushes should be inspected every now and then!
    • the boost controller allows you to adjust the opening of the wastegate (which only has one preset spring) I'm going to see how it acts on it
    • I studied the principle of wastegate to begin with. so if I understood correctly. the moment when the turbo "spool" is where the boost control begins. When the target level of "psi" is reached the wastegate opens to regulate the exhaust pressure passing through the turbo and thus control its speed and the rate of boost
×
×
  • Create New...