Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 58
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

you haters are crazy.

id love to see 2 r33 turbos in a twin set up.

less laggy, more useable power on the street then a big big single.

who cares if they end up breaking, they are cheap as piss to replace.

And you can build the setup for under a grand easily.

you haters are crazy.

id love to see 2 r33 turbos in a twin set up.

less laggy, more useable power on the street then a big big single.

who cares if they end up breaking, they are cheap as piss to replace.

And you can build the setup for under a grand easily.

Not less laggy. More laggy. You're using turbos designed for 2.5L and only running them with 1.5L. And then you still have crappy ceramic wheels that can't reliably take more than 12psi at the most.

And who cares if they blow? You realize there is the possibility of taking the motor with them right?

Edited by Hanaldo

I agree. More lag, and much more risk of losing an engine. If a wheel explodes when you're offend throttle at high revs, with the throttle body shut, and the ability for the engine to suck back from the exhaust, if it pulled some bits of turbo into the cylinder, boom.

You'll have about a $3k rebuild on your hands. New pistons, rings, bearings, bore, hone, etc.

Standards really are a bad idea. Especially with unknown kms

i disagree, for starters, whats wrong with just running 12 psi?? you have the potential to make minimum 300kw and it will definately make that power earlier in the rev range then a big single will.

also, a huge amount of people push more then 12psi through 33 turbos all day anyway with no issue, chances of damaging motor... slim.

i think its a good idea, cheap easy driveable power.

go for it!

Not less laggy. More laggy. You're using turbos designed for 2.5L and only running them with 1.5L. And then you still have crappy ceramic wheels that can't reliably take more than 12psi at the most.

And who cares if they blow? You realize there is the possibility of taking the motor with them right?

Lol of course I have "done my homework" and if I wanted to (and kept the missus happy) I could go out and buy whatever setup i chose tomorrow, paid in cash. I've already posted how much this is going to cost. I don't pay a mechanic or a welder/fabricator to work on it as I have extensive experience in these industries. The flanges are in the mail as I type and should arrive this week. It will be built as soon as all the parts arrive. As most are aware the r33 s2 turbo spools up real early. Maybe some have forgotten what a stock turbo feels like on a 25. On a 30 it will be way to small. Hence 2 turbo's. I just went for a drive to see how early the single spools up. 4th gear from about 40 kph. 12 psi at 2200. 14.5psi at 2500 rpm. I could probably get it to spool 100 rpm earlier with a change in the tune but it might be a bit hot. Also that is with only a bleed valve and a spring on the outside of the actuator that holds 9.5 psi. Those pressures are at the manifold btw. I tried holding the brake and it went to 14.5 at 2300. Have a look here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iYW_7gltGVo Its a bit wonky but if you pause it you can see it. If you see my other one its a bit old.

If you want original, why not three?

Believe me I had that idea already. Intake and exhaust piping isn't that much more difficult to knock up so to speak. It would be a tight fit tho. I haven't researched 3 either, ie :which turbos to use. I'll stick with 2 for now. I've sussed it all out and it should work pretty good.

88cameron88, this was actually a 2.5 litre. With a well set up gt3076, water meth injection, and lots of tuning to perfection done by me, it was a weapon.

I think in the lower gears it was a little higher. More like 4,000 rpm to make 12psi.

But, I think our friend here that says he's done his homework doesn't realise that when my gt3076 is making 12psi, it's a lot more flow than his standard turbo at 12psi.

Hence why all if the reasoning here is poorly thought out.

Standards early? No.

R33 bush turbo spooling earlier than a ball bearing Garrett? No.

Laggy? Yes.

Risky? Yes.

Time wasting? My opinion, yes. More time wasted stuffing around with a setup that won't work instead of driving it on a track.

well I reckon we can start placing bets on this.

I'll take 'Its never gunna happen' for the win :laugh:

Ok bud. You're on. But since you wont pay up when you lose so you can just look like a cock instead. :thumbsup: I'll keep ya posted lol

Whilst I still side with the majority on the silliness of the idea, one point comes to mind ref the boost limits and safety.

If 12psi is the sensible limit on the standard turbo on 2.5 litres, then you will be able to run much more boost at the same shaft speed when it's only working a 1.5 litre half engine. Just like using a 25 turbo on a 20, only better. Higher boost = higher exhaust temperatures of course, especially with tuning that is leaner than standard, so perhaps you can't drive them up to silly high boost (or what seems silly when talking about these turbos), but it should at least be a lot less likely to spit turbines off at 12psi than we've all been assuming so far.

That said, if you (the OP) are still intent on doing twins, for christ's sake, don't use Nissan turbos. The TD04s I talked about are just as plentiful, just as cheap, physically smaller and better suited to pairing up on a 2.5L.

Geez calm down everyone. I'm going to do this no matter what. I couldn't give two f**ks if its better or worse than anything else. Its just something to do that cost bugger all. Refer to the initial question.Tha'ts all I was thinking about. I have researched out the arse. I know that other setups work better. I don't care either. IVF works better than sex so are you all going to give up rooting? I thought not. :iluvff:

Only if you're trying to make babies. And if you're aiming to do that every time you have sex, then you're doing it wrong.

I think there's a message in there for you.

We're actually trying for a baby atm. But tha'ts a bit off topic isn't it. This twin setup isn't anything that I or anyone should lose sleep over. I'm doing it for fun. It will work no doubt. Might not compare to new ball bearing turbos. Doesn't matter tho. Just out of curiosity....who here has done this or are we all guessing, no matter how educated the guess may be?

But, I think our friend here that says he's done his homework doesn't realise that when my gt3076 is making 12psi, it's a lot more flow than his standard turbo at 12psi.

Mate if you reckon that then how could I have any idea about how to do this? What am I 15 :no:?

Hence why all if the reasoning here is poorly thought out. Who mentioned reasoning? Like I said its for cheap fun.

Standards early? No. Never said it would be. Guessing about 4k at full boost with ebc.

R33 bush turbo spooling earlier than a ball bearing Garrett? No. Never said this either

Laggy? Yes. Slightly less than twice as much as standard

Risky? Yes. Half as risky as standard.

Time wasting? My opinion, yes. More time wasted stuffing around with a setup that won't work instead of driving it on a track. Not interested in a track mate. If doing car stuff is a waste of time catch a bus or walk.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
    • Does that price include the rack time to straighten the frame and body and replacement of parts and paint, as well as the noise and emmisions testing  The last engineering certificate I had done, albeit about 15 years ago, was around $1000 for a few inspections and the certificate 
×
×
  • Create New...