Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've used the tyre calculators before to check rolling diameter, trouble is there is no allowance for wheel size and therefore potential stretch. That one did have the info on recommended size though which was useful, looks like I should be going for 255s.

Any other thoughts or experiences are useful though!

I'd agree that 245 is way too narrow for a 9.5" rim.

I am somewhat biased though as I do not like the stretched look at all.

Try this rim/tyre calculator.

http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5961140
Share on other sites

i know im goin to get flamed to death for saying it, but IMHO the federal 595 is highly over rated on a daily drive car. they are great for a weekend warrior or if u do ALOT of hard cornering. but for the daily commute i'd suggest something thats a little better in the wet and maybe wears better. i also agree with the other guys a 245 is pretty narrow on a 9.5 inch rim. id be goin a 265 to protect the rim a little better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5962498
Share on other sites

I like a slight stretched look and to help fit in the guards a little better. On my 180sx the rear runs a 9.5 with a 235-45. On the M35 the new rims are 9" so I will run a 245-45-18 but would really prefer a 235 but the diameter isnt as nice as the 245. I would never run a 265 on a 9.5" rim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5963391
Share on other sites

i'd beg to differ

pythagorus yo!

also, www.willtheyfit.com is one of the best tire size calculator i've found

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964167
Share on other sites

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

But wouldn't changing the angle of the sidewall change how the tread sits and therefore the rolling diameter? Or is that a really dumb question?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964264
Share on other sites

It would change the dia by a small amount only, didn't you guys do geometry at school, think of a tree that is 10 mtrs high, standing upright it is 10 but when on a lean it is slightly less high, the length though doesn't change but the height does, the ground is the fixed point as in the rim being the fixed point.

Dia may be changed by a mil or two maybe, post up the height of the side wall and the size of the gap from vertical.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964377
Share on other sites

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

changing the angle of the sidewall would change the height from the bead to the tread

immagine house, the wall height is 2m, the length of the roof could be 2 meters too but the height of the wall is 2m because its vertical but because the roof is on an angle the heigh of the roof may only be 1m

i think what would happen in real life would be that the circumference of the tyre would be under a little bit of compression and the sidewall would be put in tension (otherwise the tyre would wrinkle like you said, this is also neglecting the internal pressure of the air and the load from the car's weight)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964491
Share on other sites

well, using this website is the perfect example. the circumference cant be changed.

www.willtheyfit.com

put in the EXACT same tyre size into the boxes, just change the rim width and tell me what you get with rolling diameters for both sets of values.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967116
Share on other sites

195 185

Diameter 559.1mm 570.1mm

Circumference 1756.5mm 1791mm

Poke 81.6mm 81.6mm

Inset 121.6mm 121.6mm

Speedo error 0% -1.93%

Reading at 30mph 30mph 29.42mph

Reading at 60mph 60mph 58.84mph

Ride height gain 0mm 5.5mm

Arch gap loss 0mm 5.5mm

diameter changed? not by much but it did. everything else is the same except width

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967128
Share on other sites

something still isnt right about it.

if you were to measure the side wall between the two (stretched/not so stretched) the wall length would HAVE to be different for the rolling circumference to change. you can see that in the image. which means that instead of being 195/45, it may be 195/47(for argument sake) im pretty sure the rubber wont physically stretch to meet the exact circumference.

you may be very right. just doesnt make sense to me.

lol not strange that your right. strange by the law of physics. it simply doesnt agree with the pythagoras theorem which actually can be used. the hypotenuse would actually be larger with the larger width wheel, for the circumference to be exactly the same.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967158
Share on other sites

how can you use pythagorus when youre talking about a circumference?

i know you mean the cross section of the wheel/tyre, but you have to remember you cant make a circle smaller or larger unless you add or subtract to it, thus affecting the tyre size, then it would change the size of the sidewall to accomodate the larger/smaller rolling diameter

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967173
Share on other sites

i think i know what your trying to get at with the amount of rubber being the same around the circumference. and it does make sense.

but unfortunately rubber works differently. you are actually subracting from the circle(circumference) by adding a wider wheel, back to hypotenuse, for a wider wheel to = the same rolling circumference as thinner wheel, there has to be a larger hypotenuse(wall). the only way that can happen with the same spec tires, is by physically stretching the rubber material in the wall, which would make it go from a 45 -> 47 theoretically.

I think mythbusters is needed lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967195
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • One other thing worth mentioning when I did this job I only jacked up the driver side as I was only doing work there, but from what I understand both wheels should be in the air when removing the sway bar links?
    • Yep it's an r34. Usually people remove struts without removing the front upper control arm (fuca is what i assume this is?) So not sure why mine wouldn't fit. I know on my other car I did a similar job and it wouldn't fit until I removes the ball joint nut even though I didn't remove it prior.   The upper arm doesn't seem to be in the way (the part that's bolted to the chassis. The part that's bolted onto the j arm I'll check that out though.   I was going to compress the spring and put it in with the compressor attached but not sure if it will work  Haven't seen anyone do it.
    • I have a small lip on the boot of the E90 and I've been toying with the idea of trying to mould it in to the boot to remove the gaps. I guess shaving the seams? No idea what the terminology is here.  What I'm wondering is, if it's current double sided taped down, what would I do to more permanently attach it so it makes a good base for the filler? It only has edges so no way to bolt it down unless I add some braces. I've done a lot of fibre glassing in my time so that's nice and easy but I'm not sure what my options are here.  Sorry, this is the best pic I have and I'm 4 million ks from home ATM.  
    • Based on this comment I went googling. A052's in the sizes I want are certainly not cheap, but I couldn't find anything in the V70A anywhere. How much do they run/where do they get sourced from? From what I know (nothing but internet searches and reviews etc) the R888 has pretty much fallen off from anyone's actual use, and the AO52 is the king of "road legal" rubber. Nobody is driving around on their daily for Z221, AO050, DZ03G. At that point, for purely track only tyres - Why not buy actual slicks? Why does nobody actually do that anyway?
    • This an R34? It shouldn't matter though - it should be the same as on any of the others, and by "any of the others" I mean R32, because that is the car that I have had the front end apart on about 50 times this year. Sometimes, it is much easier to get the lower shock eye onto that pin when: a) you have the upper shock nuts backed off a few turns so you can wiggle it a bit more freely. When they are tight the bottom of the strut is much harder to move that _leeeetle_ bit you might need it to to win the fight. b) you have the outer bolt(s) from the FUCA out and so you can move the lower pin around freely too. Then, all you have to do is put the upper arm back on when you've got the rest back together, and this is where jacking under the balljoint can help.
×
×
  • Create New...