Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I've used the tyre calculators before to check rolling diameter, trouble is there is no allowance for wheel size and therefore potential stretch. That one did have the info on recommended size though which was useful, looks like I should be going for 255s.

Any other thoughts or experiences are useful though!

I'd agree that 245 is way too narrow for a 9.5" rim.

I am somewhat biased though as I do not like the stretched look at all.

Try this rim/tyre calculator.

http://www.rimsntires.com/specs.jsp

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5961140
Share on other sites

i know im goin to get flamed to death for saying it, but IMHO the federal 595 is highly over rated on a daily drive car. they are great for a weekend warrior or if u do ALOT of hard cornering. but for the daily commute i'd suggest something thats a little better in the wet and maybe wears better. i also agree with the other guys a 245 is pretty narrow on a 9.5 inch rim. id be goin a 265 to protect the rim a little better.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5962498
Share on other sites

I like a slight stretched look and to help fit in the guards a little better. On my 180sx the rear runs a 9.5 with a 235-45. On the M35 the new rims are 9" so I will run a 245-45-18 but would really prefer a 235 but the diameter isnt as nice as the 245. I would never run a 265 on a 9.5" rim.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5963391
Share on other sites

i'd beg to differ

pythagorus yo!

also, www.willtheyfit.com is one of the best tire size calculator i've found

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964167
Share on other sites

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

But wouldn't changing the angle of the sidewall change how the tread sits and therefore the rolling diameter? Or is that a really dumb question?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964264
Share on other sites

It would change the dia by a small amount only, didn't you guys do geometry at school, think of a tree that is 10 mtrs high, standing upright it is 10 but when on a lean it is slightly less high, the length though doesn't change but the height does, the ground is the fixed point as in the rim being the fixed point.

Dia may be changed by a mil or two maybe, post up the height of the side wall and the size of the gap from vertical.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964377
Share on other sites

it cant affect the rolling diameter. all youre doing is changing the angle of the sidewall. isnt pythagorus' theorum for triangles?? :P

changing the angle of the sidewall would change the height from the bead to the tread

immagine house, the wall height is 2m, the length of the roof could be 2 meters too but the height of the wall is 2m because its vertical but because the roof is on an angle the heigh of the roof may only be 1m

i think what would happen in real life would be that the circumference of the tyre would be under a little bit of compression and the sidewall would be put in tension (otherwise the tyre would wrinkle like you said, this is also neglecting the internal pressure of the air and the load from the car's weight)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5964491
Share on other sites

well, using this website is the perfect example. the circumference cant be changed.

www.willtheyfit.com

put in the EXACT same tyre size into the boxes, just change the rim width and tell me what you get with rolling diameters for both sets of values.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967116
Share on other sites

195 185

Diameter 559.1mm 570.1mm

Circumference 1756.5mm 1791mm

Poke 81.6mm 81.6mm

Inset 121.6mm 121.6mm

Speedo error 0% -1.93%

Reading at 30mph 30mph 29.42mph

Reading at 60mph 60mph 58.84mph

Ride height gain 0mm 5.5mm

Arch gap loss 0mm 5.5mm

diameter changed? not by much but it did. everything else is the same except width

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967128
Share on other sites

something still isnt right about it.

if you were to measure the side wall between the two (stretched/not so stretched) the wall length would HAVE to be different for the rolling circumference to change. you can see that in the image. which means that instead of being 195/45, it may be 195/47(for argument sake) im pretty sure the rubber wont physically stretch to meet the exact circumference.

you may be very right. just doesnt make sense to me.

lol not strange that your right. strange by the law of physics. it simply doesnt agree with the pythagoras theorem which actually can be used. the hypotenuse would actually be larger with the larger width wheel, for the circumference to be exactly the same.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967158
Share on other sites

how can you use pythagorus when youre talking about a circumference?

i know you mean the cross section of the wheel/tyre, but you have to remember you cant make a circle smaller or larger unless you add or subtract to it, thus affecting the tyre size, then it would change the size of the sidewall to accomodate the larger/smaller rolling diameter

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967173
Share on other sites

i think i know what your trying to get at with the amount of rubber being the same around the circumference. and it does make sense.

but unfortunately rubber works differently. you are actually subracting from the circle(circumference) by adding a wider wheel, back to hypotenuse, for a wider wheel to = the same rolling circumference as thinner wheel, there has to be a larger hypotenuse(wall). the only way that can happen with the same spec tires, is by physically stretching the rubber material in the wall, which would make it go from a 45 -> 47 theoretically.

I think mythbusters is needed lol

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373541-tyres/page/2/#findComment-5967195
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, I'm not clicking on a link to f**king bookface (never have, never will), so I can't really know what the complaint here is about, but.... There's nothing particularly wrong with forcing people to have a higher license category to drive super/hypercars. Note that the laws are not about modified cars - only listed standard cars, because there are not supposed to be cars modified enough to meet the law's category limits anyway. If you have a modified car that falls into those power limits you're already in trouble anyway. What is wrong is the bullshit on-line "test" to get the upgrade, instead of any actual work and training.
    • Meh Don't have Facebook anymore but watched a YouTube about it, they also talked about them not being able to use and "sports" modes, not really sure how they would enforce that apart from logging the Db for the cars that have exhaust valve activation in sports mode Apart from all the high end sports cars and supercars that make the sort of power they are talking about standard, I cannot see it bothering anyone else, unless of course road side tests now include having a dyno and scales on site to test the power output vs weight What is it? 500hp per ton? And if the only additional cost is $60 or so, as the video stated, I cannot see that being a war stopper for the people that outlay a few hundred thousand dollars on a performance car In fact, I see it would be a ego boost for some, because they have a "special" drivers licence for a "special"person with a "special" car And if I did have a modified car that made over the limit, there's no way in hell I would apply for a "special" licence, I could see the authorities checking your licence against your rego, so if old mate applied for a licence, but owns a, say, R33 Skyline, that may trigger an inspection of said car as to why, and how, that old mate has a R33 that would fit the bill of making over 500hp per ton Again, meh, not something I believe will be a real issue to 99.9% of people
    • https://www.facebook.com/groups/mechanic.com.au/permalink/2029367984190485/?   Here we go…. 😢
    • Hi, I'm a new member who has been lurking for a while. Ive been looking to buy an R32, 33 or 34. GTT/GTST for some time now. I'm close to pulling the pin on one,. My question is around roadworthy certificates in Victoria. What can you get away with as far as mods go?  Would a car pass RWC with a haltech dash, aftermarket manifold and high mount turbo as long as ride height and noise was ok? I come from a muscle car background, I'm learning more about our beloved Skylines as I go. I don't want to drop my savings on something to find out I need thousands to get it on the road. Cheers for any input/advice.  
    • The first year I did Putty Road I was driving the old Honda Jazz work car. Being the rear vehicle of the 2nd or 3rd group to make sure no one got lost. The GTRs in front couldn't work out how I "was with them in the twisties"... They didn't like it when they found out I was only cruising and chilling in the Jazz like it was a Sunday drive with my Nan in the car.
×
×
  • Create New...