Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I put my car on the dyno at Rotomotion on Friday to get my tune checked. I was/am using an innovate wideband that is about 3 months old. Anyway there was a 5 point difference between my wideband and the one at the dyno. Mine read 12.0 to 1 at wot. The dyno read 12.5 at wot. I got my tune adjusted accordingly. Scored and extra 5 rwhp as well. Anyway just putting it out there. It would suck to melt something cos of trusting a $260 sensor/gauge.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/373886-wideband-discrepency/
Share on other sites

I have tuned most of it myself over the last few months. I was still at work while the car was being tuned. I didn't get to see any logging when I picked it up so I'm pretty sure they just had a look at it and changed the bits I asked them to. I got it to 247 rwhp with the stock turbo at 12 psi and they found the extra 5 rwhp by adding 1 degree to load 16.

leaning out the tune under high load/boost wont really improve fuel economy. You want to have the AFR's there Safe rather then economical

The economy comes from your lean cruise points, so at constant 60km/h, 80km/h, 100km/h etc. Having your own wideband + tuning software makes this easy and you can get it running pretty good

My best friend used to tune my car for me and he said my car actually responded better to having a bit more fuel chucked in when boosting

[quote name='89CAL' timestamp='1313234034' post='5964918'

My best friend used to tune my car for me and he said my car actually responded better to having a bit more fuel chucked in when boosting

Flame takes up more space in the exhaust, more fuel equals more flame equals more spool, that's how antilag works. If you boost up on your cold start map you will see this very well.

When I said lean it out I only meant from the 11.5 it reads now to 12. Safe is good tho. On the subject of spooling up early its gotta be lean to get the exhaust gas hot and expanded to create more volume of gas to turn the exhaust wheel. Having the timing right for spool up is equally as important. Enough but not too much or it will run rich. Cars will have more power leaner but run a lot hotter. Then you reach a point where you lose power cos there aint enough fuel there. However that point is far beyond safe under high load. Don't go there! Running lean (16.5-1)and high timing (30-39) at light load on my car is optimal as I use bugger all fuel and have the engine ready to spool early. As soon as it spools and gets up in the revs (over about 4k) you gotta cool it off with the extra fuel. Antilag is not like spooling up in the normal rev range. You use stacks more fuel and completely different timing to achieve it. Phew... back to movies and beer :thumbsup:

You don't necessarily gain more power by running it right on the edge (12:1 or so). It was discuss not long ago that the japs run 10:1 AFR's and more timing to get just as much or more power as tuning done over here with leaner mixtures and less timing.

I think 16.5:1 is a bit lean for the lean cruise AFR's personally. But that's more up to you

If the tuner is used to using a sensor in the tail pipe he should be able to do a good job but both tuners i use will put another bung in the down pipe for their sensor if there is not a spare already, Just takes a few minutes and then its there for next time.

I have thought of running super rich and more timing but haven't tried it yet. Its a pity the weather is wet or I'd have a go today. I have found though that the amount of fuel used between 12 to 1 and 11 to 1 is very noticable. I can get around 650 ks a tank running at lean at light load and obviously heaps less on boost. I have found that anything past 16.5 to 1 the car surges, although most of the time in normal driving it is under that. 16.5 is just when my foot is still on the throttle at 60kph.

You don't necessarily gain more power by running it right on the edge (12:1 or so). It was discuss not long ago that the japs run 10:1 AFR's and more timing to get just as much or more power as tuning done over here with leaner mixtures and less timing.

I think 16.5:1 is a bit lean for the lean cruise AFR's personally. But that's more up to you

12.5 is safe on a RB... when tuned right... even seen 13's on a 500hp endurance engine so 12's is nowhere near the edge.

To the OP 0.5 is often the approx difference from dump to tailpipe depending on cat and dyno pickup design at the tip.

So Trent, do you reckon that 12.5 is fine for mine? Most of the RB dyno sheets I have seen are at 12 to 1. I figure that seeing as it is only driven on the street and isn't at wot for very long it wont get too hot. I haven't got a pyrometer so I cant really tell tho. In saying that I still have a stock turbo so I dont want to spit the exhaust wheel out just yet.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
    • The thing is, once the content has been tagged we can chop and change the end result as much as we want. Its identifying the content in the first place that needs to be done regardless of the final outcome.
    • Sorry @GTSBoy I thought I'd replied here. There's a new BIG version of invision coming out soon, it might be worth waiting until that happens as it contains a lot of improved functionality for tags. My suggestion would be to add a top level page (not thread) with some info on it and then link to sub pages for various topics. We could even just start really simple with 2 or 3 pages underneath it. Those pages could just have a view (like a pre configured search result) of the tags we choose to put on it. We could have some background or an intro on each of these pages. My only issue is that while admins and mods can update the existing content to contain the tags we want, new posts can have whatever tags the author wants. That said, the reason our tags are so messy is because of that, so maybe we restrict tagging to admins/mods in edits.
×
×
  • Create New...