Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have done a search but cant find a definate answer....Engine is rb26dett.

If using twin 044's, with twin entry rail etc, will 800cc injectors be ok if i just bump up the rail pressure, and If so to what power level?

My 800s are pretty much brand new sards so If I could keep them instead of having to buy new ones that would obviously be the go.

Any help is much appreciated. Cheers

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Given he asked what power level - estimated you'd say 400rwkw would be the limit. Maybe a tad more, maybe a tad less.

With bumped rail pressure my 700cc Sards are @ 65% max duty with 360rwkw on PULP (20psi).

So 400rwkw on 700cc/E85 (allowing for 35% extra fuel) would be 100% duty with the bumped rail pressure.

So you could say the 800cc on a 2.6ltr might just scrape in. But you won't know till you get there.

We have seen a couple now max 1200's at 600hp on the nose at the wheels. That is tuned logging individual cylinder EGT's.

The others that we have done seem to come in at around the same ratio so I would say 400hp at the wheels would be a fair guess as to what you could make safely on 800cc injectors but as N1 said, every setup is different and it will all come down to fuel flow and the rest of your setup.

The car we just had tuned on 1600's made 610 on 22psi and uses just over 9L/min of fuel at peak power. Not sure on the duty cycle yet but I can report back if anyone is interested (could calculate also but not sure on the exact L/min rate right now).

We are also about to wind 2 bar into it and crack 700 at the wheels. I can report findings on fuel flow and injector duty if it will help you guys out?

Yeah cause as we've seen, some tuners love 10:1 AFR's lol.

That is certainly going to damage the duty cycle.

And rightly so. If you can't run 10:1 in places of your tune then your fuel system is inadequate.

Every car we have tuned runs 10:1/10.5:1 at some point. Usually at peak torque or there abouts. But then again, none of the stuff we have tuned anymore ever blows up....ever and it's only since using this tuner

Ok well I wasn't really after a smart arse answer, I realise every setup is different but anyway the car is running dash 5-s, vipec, cams, etc.

At the moment it only has single 044 intank at 320rwkw

I have a fuel system for it consisting of 2x 044 twin entry rail and at the moment only the 800cc injectors fitted.

We have seen a couple now max 1200's at 600hp on the nose at the wheels. That is tuned logging individual cylinder EGT's.

The others that we have done seem to come in at around the same ratio so I would say 400hp at the wheels would be a fair guess as to what you could make safely on 800cc injectors but as N1 said, every setup is different and it will all come down to fuel flow and the rest of your setup.

The car we just had tuned on 1600's made 610 on 22psi and uses just over 9L/min of fuel at peak power. Not sure on the duty cycle yet but I can report back if anyone is interested (could calculate also but not sure on the exact L/min rate right now).

We are also about to wind 2 bar into it and crack 700 at the wheels. I can report findings on fuel flow and injector duty if it will help you guys out?

Wow have you got a flow gauge that does 9l/min - where do I get one of those?

Wow have you got a flow gauge that does 9l/min - where do I get one of those?

You trolling me or are you just clueless?

Calculated fuel flow based on the EXACT ms open time of the injector at peak power. The injectors are being told to deliver that exact amount of fuel. So where to get one? windows has a calculator or you can buy one from any newsagent

I'm now seeing 620 rwhp on E85 with CDI ignition allowing/accepting much more fuel. This is despite my modererate 2860-5 low mount turbo setup. My HKS 1000 CC injectors are at full duty cycle at max torque.

In hindsight, I would have gone to ID2000 (2000cc) injectors as the HKS units weren't "plug and play" in any case.

I'll take the opportunity again to express how impressed I am with the billet.net.au CDI kit (M&W CDI + bracket + harness etc). The spark strength allows bullsh*t amounts of E85 fueling midrange and just wakes up the turbo response. Forget your Splitfire/Twinpower combo.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • find it funny everyone claims different fuel chains, do different things with their fuel blah blah blah. We don't have that many fuel terminals in Australia. The fuel tanker trucks drive into the terminal, fill up, and drive directly to the service station and dump out. The majority of fuel you get, is coming out of the same terminals. The variation is actually at the individual service stations and how good their tanks are, as well as how much turn over they actually have. Older fuel stations, that haven't had their tanks replaced are going to end up with the worst fuel. Also a lot of older stations have shit design, and shit maintenance, and end up with more water absorption into the tank. This is when you then get a bad batch of fuel. Other shit things happen, like tanker drivers have a f**k up, and starting to unload the wrong compartment on their truck into the wrong tank. 
    • This one?? In other news: I cannot tell the difference between my red MX5 with the silver grey hard top......... and the Ferrari 599XX EVO, they might as well be twins, well.......apart from the big wang hanging off the back of the Ferrari...🤔🤣, without the wing they are identical   
    • Turn it into the pride flag 
    • I think you'll find we're confused about what you were trying to do and how you were doing it. I would have thought that block rigidity was something you measured while loading the block in beam or in torsion, and that you would do so before and after grout filling, to see if putting material in there created a "composite" construction with the expected rigidity increase. Notwithstanding that the true function of grout is less about gross rigidity than local (ie preventing bore deflection/splitting and tying the bores to the main bearing locations a little better, etc etc). It is nearly impossible to follow your description of what you've done without closing ones eyes and making "aliens" hand shapes in front of oneself to try to follow the manipulations you've made. It's still unclear to me what you were trying to prove.
×
×
  • Create New...