Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Im starting to not understand...

why did you get a 3582 if your only going to run low boost, it wont be operating at its best efficiency....

why not just get a smaller turbo and boost it to its feel good zone... you'll have better response...

or is this just a temporary thing?

if its temporary I dont understand this either, the pain of tuning, reconfiguring setup, and adjusting things to suit is something I think I most would prefer to do once if at all possible...

or you can put the 3582 on and my smaller turbo (2835) will complete three quarter miles while your waiting for boost to kick in... lol...

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Im starting to not understand...

why did you get a 3582 if your only going to run low boost, it wont be operating at its best efficiency....

why not just get a smaller turbo and boost it to its feel good zone... you'll have better response...

or is this just a temporary thing?

if its temporary I dont understand this either, the pain of tuning, reconfiguring setup, and adjusting things to suit is something I think I most would prefer to do once if at all possible...

or you can put the 3582 on and my smaller turbo (2835) will complete three quarter miles while your waiting for boost to kick in... lol...

If you didn't read from the start then you should. If you did then I'll clarify a few key points. In order, I'm running low boost (18 psi or so) because it is going on a 170xxx k rb25det engine. I would have got a smaller turbo but then I would just have to buy a bigger one soon so I got the one I want. On the subject of temporary, I have an rb30 in the shed almost ready to put in. Thats like the 50th time I've said that lol. I'm stroking it in less than a year. Its getting put in my car...with the gt3582r on it. I want a bigger turbo now as 190 rwkw is nowhere near enough for me. I like tuning. I almost love it. I adjust for fun. I am doing it once just not overnight cos I haven't won the lotto yet. Try putting your smaller turbo on a rb2530 and see how well it goes or better yet put it on a forged rb34. :rolleyes: As far as lag goes its not a concern for me. I'm used to old school 2 stroke motorbikes. Try them out for lag. I know my car is fast so I don't have to race between lights to prove it. Its a manual so lag is only a gearchange from disappearing. In your honest opinion who's car will be quicker down the quarter only comparing turbo's? And back to the start again, it will be running in its best efficiency zone. Just not yet.

Oh I read the start but I still dont understand...

if I put my turbo on a 2530 (forged 34 makes zero difference?) it would be killer response and choked up top, most people would say response and area under the curve is where its at....

But you cant just compare turbos when talking down the straight... I reckon you'll be waiting for boost to kick in before I do and by that time the race is over....

why dont you just wait for the new engine and then put the 3582 setup together...?

Id rather 190rwkw with std response over 3582 lagggggg....

is this a street car or track only car...???

Oh I read the start but I still dont understand...

if I put my turbo on a 2530 (forged 34 makes zero difference?) it would be killer response and choked up top, most people would say response and area under the curve is where its at....

But you cant just compare turbos when talking down the straight... I reckon you'll be waiting for boost to kick in before I do and by that time the race is over....

why dont you just wait for the new engine and then put the 3582 setup together...?

Id rather 190rwkw with std response over 3582 lagggggg....

is this a street car or track only car...???

If you want killer response then you need displacement and more cylinders and keep it na so you have the legs. If you think a forged 34 wont make a difference (wouldnt have said it to you but you said it first) then you need to read up a bit more. If we were racing then I'd use antilag or I'd have an auto and hold it on the transbrake. But were not. I agree somewhat with the 190rwkw statement. That would mean buying an extra turbo cos the stock one's die quickly. I dont want to spend 1500 on a turbo now and then do it again in 12 months. It is my daily driver. It gets cruised on the weekend and also gets a hiding from time to time (half the time :whistling:)

killer response comes with a small turbo, said nothing about having legs....

forged 34 or std 34 wont make any difference to how a turbo spools up.

stock turbos last ages if you service your car well.... do a search some people have them on cars over 200,000Ks old

but you dont have anti-lag or transbraked auto do you, you have a laggy turbo on a small breathing setup... yes yes for the time being...

I understand now that its a temporary setup... I just dont agree with your thinking...

Did you end up getting your questions answered???

I think we noticed there was a floor to your setup and could maybe make you aware of your downfall before it cost you time and money...

As long as your happy with your choices at the end of the day...

Some of us just make different choices with our own reasoning I guess...

i dont understand why a gt35 wont hammer on a rb25, can someone enlighten me? cause ive seen them on utube and they absolutely have balls , and why isnt 18psi in there efficiency zone or close enough to it?

from reading the thread its a tempory setup by a guy that likes to tinker with his beast, whats so wrong with that?

i dont understand why a gt35 wont hammer on a rb25, can someone enlighten me? cause ive seen them on utube and they absolutely have balls , and why isnt 18psi in there efficiency zone or close enough to it?

from reading the thread its a tempory setup by a guy that likes to tinker with his beast, whats so wrong with that?

It will hammer mate. You and I both know it. I'll make another clip after its on the car. And yep I'm doing up my car. A bit at a time. More parts will come later. Its not a track car so it wont break (fingers crossed). Nothing wrong with that aye :thumbsup:

Have a sus of this clip. It is 430 rwhp at 18 psi...http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bTsYbu66NUk&feature=related...

I think we noticed there was a floor to your setup and could maybe make you aware of your downfall before it cost you time and money...

As long as your happy with your choices at the end of the day...

Some of us just make different choices with our own reasoning I guess...

Check out #743 in the rb25 dyno thread. Floor and downfall??? :rofl2:

Personally if you are going to wait a year and change the motor I would just slap a highflowed 25 turbo on there for now, hypergear do some very nice units for just over a grand, that way you can keep everything stock and get similar power with stock spool and bugger all lag. You are going to be pushing what maybe 280kw with this setup at that boost? It will be very laggy imo.

I would honestly keep the turbo on the shelf until your 3L is done and you can run the turbo to its max, it will be painful to drive for the year on low boost. High flow will be much more fun and you can easily sell it when you are finished.

That is what I would do anyway.

There is no way in hell I would run a 3" afm in the intake of a 4" front GT3582R!!

Has anyone done a back to back to see how much of a restriction it does cause?

As far as ive seen 18 psi is enough to kill a stock rb25, so i hope you arent expecting it to last a year. I made 316rwkw@16 psi on a stock motor with a .63ex.

If it is tuned correctly and never sees detonating or oil starvation (drifting etc) then it should last much longer than a year, just keep the revs under 7500.

Edited by Rolls

Hey Rolls :D I've been speaking to a guy on here who has a very similar setup to what I will have. Reckons he sees 23 psi at 4800 and makes about 420 rhwp. This was done on a stainless manifold, not sure what brand. Has run his motor like this for 2 years as well as running it at 26 psi for a dyno day to pull 470 rwhp. I'm getting a 6boost manifold and with my deadly tuning :whistling: and the manifold I reckon I can get it to spool up a fair bit earlier. A electronic boost controller might help things a bit. I'll certainly try it at 20something psi. Also I was thinking that I might just chuck in the rb30 with the untouched bottom end and take it easy for a while. At least it will improve the spool up time a bit. I'll only do that if the 25 sucks too much. I seriously thought about getting a high flow for the next year but I really only wanted to buy one turbo so this is the one I'm stuck with.

On the subject of tuning with the new turbo, I'll make sure that it doesn't knock. Lol I'm not going to just assemble it and go out and floor it, tho it would be cool. I'll just sus out the load lines carefully a bit at a time till I'm sure that it will be ok. So far it hasn't seen past load 16. I have put a tune through the whole map (fuel and ignition) but haven't used it all yet so I'll see how it goes.

I use motul oil and it never gets held at wot for long. I generally don't go sideways cos I'm on public roads so the oil will be staying where it should. Most of the time I only rev it to 6600 cos the power drops off at 6950 anyway with the standard turbo. I'll up my limiter to 7600 from 7000 so it doesn't hit it anymore when the new turbo is on, also giving me a bit more legs.

I'm going to get it back on the dyno for a check after I tune it and I'll try the afm where it is and in the cooler piping to have a sus. You can be sure that I will post results, pics and a couple of youtube clips once its done :yes:

4800rpm is massive lag, transient response will suck as well, being as you will have to limit it to 7500rpm for reliability that is only a ~2k power band. Just have a look at some videos on youtube to see how laggy it is.

Highly recommend a small highflow until you get everything ready.

Edited by Rolls

4800rpm is massive lag, transient response will suck as well, being as you will have to limit it to 7500rpm for reliability that is only a ~2k power band. Just have a look at some videos on youtube to see how laggy it is.

Highly recommend a small highflow until you get everything ready.

what, could it be that others think your temporary setup will be laggy as well...

seriously a $250 std turbo will be nicer to drive on this temporary setup rather than the 35r... save the new turbo for the new bottom end and it will be a nicer install, feel nicer and the car will still have its nice response in the meantime...

if you think 4800rpm is not lagged then, continue on your own way...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's odd, it works fine here. Try loading it on a different device or browser? It's Jack Phillips JDM, a Skyline wrecker in Victoria. Not the cheapest, but I have found them helpful to find obscure parts in AU. https://jpjdm.com/shop/index.php
    • Yeah. I second all of the above. The only way to see that sort of voltage is if something is generating it as a side effect of being f**ked up. The other thing you could do would be to put a load onto that 30V terminal, something like a brakelamp globe. See if it pulls the voltage away comepletely or if some or all of it stays there while loaded. Will give you something of an idea about how much danger it could cause.
    • I would say, you've got one hell of an underlying issue there. You're saying, coils were fully unplugged, and the fuse to that circuit was unplugged, and you measured 30v? Either something is giving you some WILD EMI, and that's an induced voltage, OR something is managing to backfeed, AND that something has problems. It could be something like the ECU if it takes power from there, and also gets power from another source IF there's an internal issue in the ECU. The way to check would be pull that fuse, unplug the coils, and then probe the ECU pins. However it could be something else doing it. Additionally, if it is something wired in, and that something is pulsing, IE a PWM circuit and it's an inductive load and doesnt have proper flyback protection, that would also do it. A possibility would be if you have something like a PWM fuel pump, it might be giving flyback voltages (dangerous to stuff!). I'd put the circuit back into its "broken" state, confirm the weird voltage is back, and then one by one unplug devices until that voltage disappears. That's a quick way to find an associated device. Otherwise I'd need to look at the wiring diagrams, and then understand any electrical mods done.   But you really should not be seeing the above issue, and really, it's indicating something is failing, and possibly why the fuse blew to begin with.
    • A lot of what you said there are fair observations and part of why I made that list, to make some of these things (like no advantage between the GSeries and GSeries II at PR2.4 in a lot of cases) however I'm not fully convinced by other comments.  One thing to bare in mind is that compressor flow maps are talking about MASS flow, in terms of the compressor side you shouldn't end up running more or less airflow vs another compressor map for the same advertised flow if all external environmental conditions are equivalent if the compressor efficiency is lower as that advertised mass flow takes that into consideration.   Once the intercooler becomes involved the in-plenum air temperature shouldn't be that different, either... the main thing that is likely to affect the end power is the final exhaust manifold pressure - which *WILL* go up when you run out of compressor efficiency when you run off the map earlier on the original G-Series versus G-Series II as you need to keep the gate shut to achieve similar airflow.    Also, how do you figure response based off surge line?  I've seen people claim that as an absolute fact before but am pretty sure I've seen compressors with worse surge lines actually "stand up" faster (and ironically be more likely to surge), I'm not super convinced - it's really a thing we won't easily be able to determine until people start using them.     There are some things on the maps that actually make me wonder if there is a chance that they may respond no worse... if not BETTER?!  which brings me to your next point... Why G2 have lower max rpm?  Really good question and I've been wondering about this too.  The maximum speed *AND* the compressor maps both look like what I'd normally expect if Garrett had extended the exducers out, but they claim the same inducer and exducer size for the whole range.   If you compare the speed lines between any G and G2 version the G2 speed lines support higher flow for the same compressor speed, kinda giving a pretty clear "better at pumping more air for the same speed" impression. Presumably the exducer includes any extended tip design instead of just the backplate, but nonetheless I'd love to see good pics/measurements of the G2 compressors as everything kinda points to something different about the exducer - specifically that it must be further out from the centerline, which means a lower rpm for the same max tip speed and often also results in higher pressure ratio efficiency, narrower maps, and often actually can result in better spool vs a smaller exducer for the same inducer size... no doubt partly due to the above phenomenon of needing less turbine speed to achieve the same airflow when using a smaller trim. Not sure if this is just camera angle or what, but this kinda looks interesting on the G35 990 compressor tips: Very interested to see what happens when people start testing these, and if we start getting more details about what's different.
×
×
  • Create New...