Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

iirc the IAT sender and the ecu coolant temp sender are the same, so it'd work as a IAT sensor.

But the problem is, you cant simply remove all the coolant temp compensations in the ecu. its used for general enrichment, cranking injection times, cold idle, overheating protection and cold timing protection.

have a look at the cranking injector times in the standard power fc map, theres a massive difference between hot and cold start. once you wire it up the way your saying it probably wont even start, let alone run properly.

  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

iirc the IAT sender and the ecu coolant temp sender are the same, so it'd work as a IAT sensor.

But the problem is, you cant simply remove all the coolant temp compensations in the ecu. its used for general enrichment, cranking injection times, cold idle, overheating protection and cold timing protection.

have a look at the cranking injector times in the standard power fc map, theres a massive difference between hot and cold start. once you wire it up the way your saying it probably wont even start, let alone run properly.

Ahh yes you are right that there is more than the water temp correction to think of.

Acceleration enrichment is rpm dependent so it is not affected by the coolant sensor unless there is a water temp correction involved.

The cranking injection times are something to consider also. As you are aware these can be changed according to coolant temp. It is possible, under certain conditions, having the signal at 40 degrees when the engine is at 80 degrees could flood the engine.

In regard to cold idle I guess you would have to either disable the aac or put a switch on it. Then it could be a pain in the ass to start or at worse the mixture would be lean under whatever temp the sensor was reading, assuming that you used the coolant temp sensor as an air temp sensor. This could be resolved with the water temp correction..

My cold ign correction is all set to zero. I just don't flog my car when its cold, but you are correct in saying that is has dependency on the coolant sensor input. As far as overheating protection goes you would have to keep an eye on the aftermarket temp gauge. This would not affect the ecu tho.

I have altered my cranking ms times from stock. It is 25ms at 10 degrees and 14ms at 50 and 80 degrees. My car does start ok using even as high as 50ms at 80 degrees. Not that I would but it is just an example.

I think that it would be worth trying to use the coolant sensor for intake temp, although there is a high likelihood that the car would not end up satisfactory. I personally would try it as I can adjust everything for the swap. I would not recommend it to anyone that cannot do the work themselves and tune their own vehicle.

This seems to be one of those mods that is best achieved by using the right equipment in the first place, ie: a suitable ecu.

Another quick update. I got the car back from the exhaust shop today. I got a 3 inch mandrel bent dump made with a fitting for my wideband sensor. The guy did an excellent job and it was a fair price. The car is a lot quieter (dur) and has lost 3 psi from having the exhaust hooked up. Replacing the stock cat is next on the list. I have a manual boost tee so its all good. I haven't done much driving cos its peak hour so I'll make a little vid later when the missus gets home.

Lag. Yes there is lots of it and if I wasn't going to use the rb30 in the shed and eventually a put a 3.4L in it I would have bought a smaller and cheaper turbo. Still even off boost the car goes almost as good as my v6 vt commodore so I'm not complaining. There is almost no boost under 4000rpm. If I flatten it at low rpm I can get some boost down low but not much. At 4000 the car goes ok and at 4500 or so it goes spastic.I'll just make this clear now...In my opinion a gt35r is too big for an rb25det doing street duties. I can live with it tho and it wont be long before that lag drops over 1000rpm with the new motor.

I bought a new bolt type clamp for the part of the piping that keeps popping off and it held 16 psi. I will turn it up a little more tonight but I needed to get home and have a rest after work. Its been a long day. Oh btw the wastegate is f**king loud. Its a quiet car then its screaming its head off. ohmy.gif I'll be getting a screamer pipe plumbed into the exhaust next week or whenever.

Anyway rest now...

I think it should go pretty good with 3.4L tho. The torque off boost will be a lot nicer too.

I forgot to mention before about my tune. The afr's are still spot on and there was a max of 14 knock at any time. I'll get comfortable with the new power and find my preferred boost level then put it on the dyno. Give it a few weeks tho.

Great work mate! Sounding good. Yeah definitely pick up a 100 cell metal cat (I recommend from Venom), the stock cat will be restricting it a lot.

With a GT35 I would recommend a 3.5" outlet to the cat and then 3.5" from there onwards. 3" catback is too small for a GT35.

Ah yeah a 3.4L will definitely help with the spool hahaha, that will be unreal.

So I just made a little vid of going up the road and then to the pizza shop. Saw 20 psi, popped of the boost gauge hose and slipped the clutch in 3rd no.gif So much for a hd clutch...

The vid is a bit crap cos its dark and the camera isn't fixed. Anyway I'll upload it and it should be ready in half an hour yes.gif

I have a GT35 on my stock rb26 with poncams, i get 1 bar of boost by 4000rpm in 4th and full boost by around 4300rpm. I see that everyone looks at "lag" differently, to be honest i dont think my setup is laggy at all.

As for the exhaust side of things, Im running a 3" dump to a decat which is also 3" and the catback is 3.5". Setup is making 485hp at all 4 hubs on 20psi so my 3" dump is not a restriction :)

I feel comfortable knowing the 0.82rear housing is getting rid of all the heat at high rpm quickly as compared to a 0.63. I rather my engine breathe better than come on boost a few hundred rpm earlier!

To give you an idea on how much fuel you will need for a GT35 running 20pounds, my sard 700ccs are running at 89-92% with the stock FPR and an intank 044. Not sure on what my AFRS are though as i forgot to ask my tuner.

As for the RB34, or even an RB30 for that matter, id go a TO4z with a 1.0x housing, a 0.82 gt35 seems kinda small for an engine like that?

Edited by snozzle

I have a GT35 on my stock rb26 with poncams, i get 1 bar of boost by 4000rpm in 4th and full boost by around 4300rpm. I see that everyone looks at "lag" differently, to be honest i dont think my setup is laggy at all.

As for the exhaust side of things, Im running a 3" dump to a decat which is also 3" and the catback is 3.5". Setup is making 485hp at all 4 hubs on 20psi so my 3" dump is not a restriction :)

I feel comfortable knowing the 0.82rear housing is getting rid of all the heat at high rpm quickly as compared to a 0.63. I rather my engine breathe better than come on boost a few hundred rpm earlier!

To give you an idea on how much fuel you will need for a GT35 running 20pounds, my sard 700ccs are running at 89-92% with the stock FPR and an intank 044. Not sure on what my AFRS are though as i forgot to ask my tuner.

As for the RB34, or even an RB30 for that matter, id go a TO4z with a 1.0x housing, a 0.82 gt35 seems kinda small for an engine like that?

Hey man biggrin.gif I think the boost in my car comes on about 300 rpm later than yours but then I don't have cams and I'm down 100cc in capacity. I checked the injector duty cycle after giving it some at 20 psi and they were at 56%. I'm using 900cc @ 3bar jecs injectors.

I spoke to an engine builder here in Perth who has built rb's including a 7xxrwhp rb26 and he recommended the gt35r for a the rb30. It might be too small for the 3.4L but realistically I'd rather the turbo come on earlier and still be able to put out 500hp or so to the wheels.

About the exhaust, I asked the exhaust bloke about making me a bigger exhaust for the power I will make and he said 3 inch will be fine just delete the cat. So yeah a big cat is on the list. Right next to a new clutch sad.gif

Hey man biggrin.gif I think the boost in my car comes on about 300 rpm later than yours but then I don't have cams and I'm down 100cc in capacity. I checked the injector duty cycle after giving it some at 20 psi and they were at 56%. I'm using 900cc @ 3bar jecs injectors.

The 100cc difference in capacity is more like 60cc. It would make fark all difference, especially if you have VCT enabled and working properly. I think you will find that 300rpm is down to a restriction with the stock cat, will be interesting to see how it goes with a big high flow cat fitted. I know I picked up about 500rpm of response when I upgraded my cat and that was with the stock turbo.

Setup is making 485hp at all 4 hubs on 20psi so my 3" dump is not a restriction :)

Yeah I recommended a 3.5" catback as you already have.

How have you come to the conclusion that a 3" dump is not a restriction? Because its making good power?

Well i wasnt expecting any more power than the result i got and i got around 25hp jump from going 18 to 20psi, If the dump was a restricition id assume the increase in power would be less? Fuel system would be maxed out at around 510hp so the boost was capped at 20psi and tuner made sure there was plenty of fuel in there to keep my pistons happy :)

Edited by snozzle

Yeah dont get me wrong thats a tonne of power and it sounds like a heap of fun! Just providing some advice while the thread owner is getting his exhaust made up. I was spewing after I chose a smaller exhaust and then threw it out and went bigger. May as well go big straight up, especially with RB34 and a GT35!

I will be getting the exhaust replaced from the dump back next year. I'll get a cat before then tho. When I mentioned the clutch slipping it didn't just slip. It hit the limiter at 7600 as soon as it came on boost in 3rd. It's rooted now. I'll pull the box out and have a sus soon.

Yeah I recommended a 3.5" catback as you already have.

How have you come to the conclusion that a 3" dump is not a restriction? Because its making good power?

He has an external gate venting to atmosphere... Don't you have an internal gate? Totally different ball game when it comes to exhaust flow

http://www.youtube.c...h?v=cpyXkX7aeMo

Here is a quick shaky vid. Watch out for frequent swearing. After you see the clutch slip in 3rd cut to near the end where I show under the bonnet quickly.

14psi @ 4050rpm and 20psi @ 4400rpm.

Edited by Room42

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
    • Hi guys, has anyone either purchased or built themselves a rotisserie for their car before? I can only just justify the need for one hence why I should just make one but at the same time, if I make one I can kiss another 4 weeks of potentially productive car working time goodbye because I'm building a bloody rotisserie....  I mainly want it for the application of the body deadener.  Cleaning the old stuff off, priming and then colour over the deadener doesn't worry me, it's just the application using the Schutz Gun that I feel would achieve a significantly better finish painting it side on and keeping the Schutz Gun upright.  I don't think they would work well on the side let alone almost upside down for some areas.  If the product I use (Terosun, etc) could work through a HVLP ok then it might be ok to apply without the rotisserie.   I can get one of these style ones for about $1200 which is pretty good value-     I reckon if I made one it would cost around $500 but it's more the time that it would take is more of a killer than the cost.  They look to hold their value pretty well second hand so I could always sell it after using it and realistically only lose $200-$300 at worst.  Or keep it and buy another project when this one finally sees the light of day... Anyone selling one...? Cheers!  
    • While it is a very nice idea to put card style AFMs into the charge pipe (post intercooler, obviously), the position of the AFM and the recirc valve relative to each other starts to become something that you really have to consider. The situation: The stock AFM is located upstream the turbo, and the recirc valve return is located between the AFM and the turbo inlet, aimed at the turbo inlet, so that it flows away from and not through the AFM. Thus, once metered air is not metered again, neither flowing forwards, or backwards, when vented out of the charge pipe. When you put the AFM between the turbo outlet and the TB, there is a volume of pressurised charge pipe upstream of the AFM and there is a volume of pressurised pipe downstream of the AFM. When the recirc valve opens and vents the charge pipe, air is going to flow from both ends of the charge pipe towards the recirc valve. If the recirc valve is in the stock location, then the section between it and the TB doesn't really matter here - you're not going to try to put the AFM in that piece of pipe. But the AFM will likely be somewhere between the intercooler and the recirc valve, So the entire charge pipe volume from that position (upstream of the AFM, back through the intercooler, to the turbo outlet) is going to flow through the AFM, get registered as combustion air, cause the ECU to fuel for it, but get dumped out of the recirc valve and you will end up with a typical BOV related rich spike. So ideally you want to put the AFM as close to the TB as possible (so, just upstream of the crossover pipe, assuming that the stock crossover is still in use, or, just before the TB if an FFP is being used) and locate the recirc valve at the turbo outlet. Recirc valve at the turbo outlet is the new normal for things like EFRs anyway. In the even of a recirc valve opening dumping all the air in the charge pipe, pretty much all of it is going to go backwards, from the TB to the recirc valve near the turbo outlet. But only a small portion of it (that between the TB and the AFM) will pass through the AFM, and it will pass through going backwards. The card style AFMs are somewhat more immune to reading flow that passes through them in reverse than older AFMs are, so you should absolutely minimise the rich pulse behaviour associated with the unavoidable outcome of having both a recirc valve and an AFM in the charge pipe.
    • Yep, in my case as soon as I started hearing weird noises I backed off the tension until it sounded normal again. Delicate balance between enough tension to avoid that cold start slip and too much damaging things.
×
×
  • Create New...