Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello there,

For my Boostcontroller (EVC) I need a source that feeds the manifold pressure (so after the throttle) into the EVC.

(for meassurement of boost)

Apart from the nipple at the plenum (front face of it) is there anything I could use instead?

I don't want to route a hose there since it would not look nice ;)

So any ideas?

Thanks ...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/374528-r33gtst-need-boost-source-evc/
Share on other sites

The stock Nissan one sits at the back of the engine bay I think. I just used the line to my FPR.

yes it does, hence why its perfect for routing into the cabin.

never ever ever T anything into the FPR vac line

there is absolutly no reason you cant T a map sensor into the fpr line .

not the blow off valve or pressure source or boost controller

tap it into the line at the back of the plenum for the factory boost gauge . while your at it throw the whole line away and replace it . its some weird hard plastic and its well known for splitting

its just a bad idea in general. a map sensor might not create any issues but if you ever get any sort of leak/bleed on that line it'll drop fuel pressure under boost, which isnt good. theres plenty of other good spots to get boost references from

I agree with Jonno.the FPR line can be used but Its best to use a differen boost source when possible.

As he said if a boost leak occurs on that line the fuel pressure may drop and cause a lean condition

So how many things can you T off on 1 line?

You can tee as many things as you like. At some stage you may just be able to get enough length of 3 or 4mm bore hose attached to a single point that you can slightly delay the pressure signal by a small fraction of a second.

Think about it. There is no real flow in these lines. If they all go to MAP sensors or FPRs that just sense pressure, then there is no air going anywhere. All that happens is that when the plenum is under vacuum (and then so is the length(s) of hose off a tapping point) and you open the throttle and let boost in, then a small amount of air will cram into the hose(s) as the pressure rises. Then when you slam the throttle shut the opposite has to happen and a bit of air has to flow out of the hose(s) so the pressure can drop. But these sort of pressure pulses happen very very quickly. I'm sure the maximum number of such connections someone might want to make in a typical engine bay might be able to be counted on one hand, and so the total volume inside the litle hoses won't add up to much. And that's not even considering the possibility that some of the hoses might go to things that are mounted in the cabin and so could be 2m long. Still not going to add much delay to the signal.

BUT. If there is flow in the line, such as when you have a traditional boost controller with a bleed, then there is air flow in the line and you would be wise not to a) connect too many things together and b) connect things that might be upset by the leak (bleed), such the FPR.

I agree with Jonno.the FPR line can be used but Its best to use a differen boost source when possible.

As he said if a boost leak occurs on that line the fuel pressure may drop and cause a lean condition

Can someone clear this up for me? Does the stock GTST fuel pressure reg increase fuel pressure further if it sees above atmospheric pressure at the manifold? As in, a reg on a NA car operates at atmospheric pressure (wide open throttle) or lower,

Can someone clear this up for me? Does the stock GTST fuel pressure reg increase fuel pressure further if it sees above atmospheric pressure at the manifold? As in, a reg on a NA car operates at atmospheric pressure (wide open throttle) or lower,

Absolutely. Whatever pressure is in the inlet manifold is the pressure that is applied to the FPR diaphragm. The only reason FPR signal can't go higher than 1 bar absolute is that the pressure in the manifold can't go any higher. Put a turbo on the same engine with the same FPR (ie just turbo the NA engine) and the FPR will now see whatever boost is applied to it and increase the fuel pressure by the same amount.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't like "actual computers" for in car use. They take time to boot up, have OS annoyances, and so on. Arduinos etc are ready to go a few seconds after power on, don't mind being agressively powere cycled, because everything is non-volatile, don't mind being shaken and stirred.
    • As Fred would tell us, it's all about interpreting the rules. It's not a water sprayer, it's a water mister... But everything else you've said, 100%! Even a raspberry Pi would be great, use HDMI out for a display, and add a raspberry Pi CANBus hat to read values out from the ECU.
    • Being a race car, and being in the era of the Arduino, one would think it would take little effort to build a controller to do the spraying based on a real physical measurment. Waaaaay back in the dim dark AS days, JE "designed" (as in, he had help) a microcontroller based intercooler spray system. It watched the difference between a temp sensor stuck on the core and one in the free air in front of the cooler, and if the temperature difference exceeded a (settable) threshold, it would activate the sprays. Thus, it only ran water when there was an actual need for water. If you stop to think about the actual physical things that are going on in that stack of coolers, there's probably at least a couple of triggering conditions one could come up with, and one could probably even run one pump with more than one solenoid valve, to allow water to be placed where it is needed, or at all points at once (if it is needed at all points). We're in the age of science baby. But.... I suspect that intercooler water sprays are on the forbidden list in most circuit classes, no? So only good for Targa type stuff?
    • I'll just leave this with, holy shit, those cars at work are awesome, and this will look wicked!
    • Could you modify this duct so instead it pushes the extra air through the radiator too and not down and out? For temps, I know it's not the greatest idea, but as a bit of a last resort, you could use a very intermittent misting spray onto the front of the coolers/rad. You don't want to be soaking them such that water is dripping off, but a small most on/off so that the water evaporates. That point of it constantly evaporating, rather than being soaked in water, will pull a LOT of heat out of the cooler. I'm literally thinking just the little mist sprayers for a garden from Bunnings. Being in a low humidity climate it will help even more! The other trick if you want to be ghetto is some shade cloth hung in the opening, and keep it wet. Pretty much now it's acting like an evap cooler on a house, but cooling the air you need to use to cool the radiator...   On a topic to think about too though, when air enters through the bumper, is it all nicely ducted from the edges of that opening back at a nice angle, or is it like most cars, and the edge of the opening just stops, and suddenly it's wayyy wider behind that? If it does the later, get it shrouded out at nice angles. When that opening changes too rapidly, it can actually cause a high pressure zone between the front bar and radiator, and limit air flow into that area, which means less air for cooling, as it effectively stalls the air, AND adds to drag...
×
×
  • Create New...