Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all,

I want to ask some questions about the red line on the RB25DET motor and gearbox. Ive read a couple dynos in the rb25 thread and some people have higher than 7000rpm red lines. I am not one to push my car to red line but when I do, I just pop pop pop as I hit the limiter. By what amount would one be decreasing the life of the engine by increasing rpm limit to say 7500? What is it which will have the most strain imposed on it, box, engine, syncros, etc? The reason I ask is sometimes I hit the limiter at only 6900rpm. If I can raise the RPM limit to say 7500 and then use 7000 as my max rpm, that would be awesome, that way I don't have the power flop of missing a shift at 7krpm.

Ive hit 7krpm, 3 times n my car. I never usually go past 5500 - 6000.

Stock top and bottom end with all bolt on mods and the power fc ecu.

atr43ss10psi240rwkws.jpg

This is my current dyno setup on the SS2 hypergear turbo.

The dyno from Tao running full boost(20psi)

atr43ss320rwkw.jpg

The turbo will certainly hold the power beyond red line. I am not doing this to get any extra speed or power, but mainly to prevent hitting the limiter and losing that bit of power. People fit Bee R rev limiters all the time on stock motors and from factory these hit 7krpm so I can only imagine the purpose of installing the rev limiter is to raise rpm and not lower it.

Anyone shed any light on what I can destroy here and if I should or should not do this?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/374683-red-line-limit/
Share on other sites

if you have the power fc commander you can change the rev limit as simple as going to settings and changing the value... by the looks of it, lTrent changed it for the dyno as it goes to 7200.

Someone else will be more experienced in answering on more wear and tear with higher rpms but yes it can cause big issues, factory items were not designed to spin that fast etc, but if you rarely are on limiter things should be ok, atleast for a while.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/374683-red-line-limit/#findComment-5976695
Share on other sites

The car wont be seeing this type of RPM day to day, its simply to create a cloud around the original red line so there isn't that splutter when you hit the limit and lose power. Unless it can be done safely, I won't do it. I can understand the stress on the head will greatly rise. 20psi through it and close to 400hp isn't helping either. Simon is crazy but I do admire his work lol. If I can get my self an RB30 bottom end for cheap and pickup an RB25 head down the track, ill build my motor slowly as a backup if this does go ahead and something goes plunk lol.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/374683-red-line-limit/#findComment-5976731
Share on other sites

Not really sure what relevance the dyno graphs have to all this...

BUT just up the limiter to 7300-7500 and don't go past 7000?

That way you won't hit the limiter which isn't good for the motor.

Nothing else needs to be considered (gearbox, diff etc).

20psi/400HP is nothing for the RB25 head, nor is 8000rpm. Unless rebuilt just don't push the stocker, it'll last years like everyone else.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/374683-red-line-limit/#findComment-5976741
Share on other sites

Not really sure what relevance the dyno graphs have to all this...

BUT just up the limiter to 7300-7500 and don't go past 7000?

That way you won't hit the limiter which isn't good for the motor.

Nothing else needs to be considered (gearbox, diff etc).

20psi/400HP is nothing for the RB25 head, nor is 8000rpm. Unless rebuilt just don't push the stocker, it'll last years like everyone else.

So it would be nice and safe to increase the RPM just to create the cushion around the red line? The dyno graph was just to show that if I did increase the rpm and happen to take it 200rpm higher, I won't just be running the turbo out of efficiency and creating more heat in the turbo. Ill speak to JEZ about this when I take the car up to him.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/374683-red-line-limit/#findComment-5976989
Share on other sites

7600 is the default setting i usually use, 8200 for those that need a few extra legs much over this on a r33 and its touch and go (valve train) the neo is happy to about 8500... but all is pointless if the turbo rolls over @ 7k... a bit of over rev is good to keep you off the limiter.

Its common practice in japan to up the limiter to 8800-9000 on rb's to stop you actually hitting them and destroying oil pump gears.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/374683-red-line-limit/#findComment-5977846
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I swear at my GKTech ones every time I have to take them apart and replace a spherical. But I wouldn't swap them for anything else. They absolutely slay every other option, at least in terms of how they actually work. You sure you don't want to live with bearings? I mean, they don't have "ball bearings". They are rod ends and sphericals throughout. Tough as nuts, even though I have found more than one way to wear them out.
    • From when I was looking at getting the 86 engineered for the turbo, the joint said to put in a few euro 5 or 6 cats, then tune the car on a nice clean E85 tune When I was looking at a turbo for the MX5, it was basically the same thing, a couple of cats and a nice clean tune Although, it will depend on the year of the Jeep IRT emmisions standards required, and what mods are done, especially if it has a newer engine installed that requires a higher Euro
    • Yeah - but it's not actually that easy. There are limits for HC, CO, NOx and particulates. Particulates shouldn't be a concern in any petrol engine unless trying to comply to the very latest Euro standard. But getting a tune right so that all the others stay within limits AT THE SAME TIME is not a trivial exercise. You couldn't possibly get it right by just guessing at the tuner's dyno, unless he had a 4 gas analyser up the pipe, which is not often the case these days. It used to be. Every decent shop that did "tune ups" (as opposed to tuning) would have a 4 gas analsyer. Perhaps there's still quite a few of them around these days. But most "tuners" are only watching O2 and power readings.
    • Slight segway but the most expensive part of the whole thing which I would have thought would only be required for an engine size/type swap, not a VIV test, is emissions testing.  That's when you get into the big bucks.  I can't remember the exact price now but I got quotes for the GT-R based on swapping to RB30 (not that anyone bothers doing it legally anymore...) and it was around $4500 just for that alone.  The guy that does them manipulates the tune on the vehicle to make sure it passes.  The cheaper option is to book into Kangan Batman Tafe (I think that's where it was) and hire their tester.  Allegedly you're not allowed in there with the car though so not in a position to tweak anything to make sure the vehicle passes.  I'm sure in this day and age of ultra tuneable ECU's you could get the tuner to program a special efficiency (clean) tune that emits the lowest amount of particulates possible that would pass the test.  It might only make 50kW's but as long as it passed who cares!
    • I'm sure he has left signs, or, he is looking down, laughing That's my cunning plan for when I leave, lots of half finished projects, with no rhyme or reason of where I was actually up to, just to keep everyone on their toes
×
×
  • Create New...