Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

It's still gotta be jacked up, but you don't have to remove the shock, you just take a measurement sitting on ground, wind in or out how much extra you want on the shock body then put the wheel back on and take it off the stands.

You can adjust the camber yourself but unless you have experience doing your own alignments at home (string line etc)you'll just be guessing. Best to have that done by someone else, you can put the stock eccentric bushes at the same "point" in rotation but that doesn't account for anything that might be slightly bent on the car and beleive me it's more common than you think to have a .5 degree bend in the wheel hub carrier that throws everything out.

yeah so i would just leave the shockie the coild overs come with in the spring and just unbolt and do back up. sounds easy. i will look into those BCBR's

Thanks for your help mate. (gonna stick to 100mm off ground with 18's - think 100mm is still the limmit

yeah so i would just leave the shockie the coild overs come with in the spring and just unbolt and do back up. sounds easy. i will look into those BCBR's

Thanks for your help mate. (gonna stick to 100mm off ground with 18's - think 100mm is still the limmit

Pretyty much, you just undo the locking nut, with the c-spanner, then rotate the whole assembly until you have either less thread visible on the shock body (lower) or more (higher) and measure the difference.

Easy peasy.

yeah so i would just leave the shockie the coild overs come with in the spring and just unbolt and do back up. sounds easy. i will look into those BCBR's

Thanks for your help mate. (gonna stick to 100mm off ground with 18's - think 100mm is still the limmit

yeah 100mm is pretty low. Especially if you have a stock bodykit. N if you have an aftermarket bodykit then u risk damaging that.

I used to have mine at dead on 100mm n scraped my arse everywhere. Now at 120mm n barely ever scrape. Car handles better too not being so dumped...

also remember when you are adjusting the height, to check it you need to not only take the car off the jacks but also compress the suspension again. You can do this by pushing down/bouncing eaither corner but easiest way is to just take it for adrive n go round a few corners, accelerate n break a bit. That way you know that is exactly how it will sit.

Edited by jjman

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...