Jump to content
SAU Community

Information Re: Crashing Into Unregistered Car

HR_31GT

By HR_31GT,
in Western Australia

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr Eps Grand Master

Mr Eps

Posted
Posted

Yeah man you're getting private insurance mixed up with compulsory third party insurance (registration)

Two different things.

If it was an accident like, an ACTUAL MISTAKE....

and he's not insured with a company... And ROB isn't insured. Then it's settled. Tell the guy to

A) fk off

B) suck a dick

If he has a problem then just call up three of your black friends to go run a train on his ass and turn his body into a playground. Simple!

E3lipse Contributor

E3lipse

Posted
Posted (edited)

If you were to go for a cash settlement, remember to prepare a written, better to be typed out agreement/contract that that's the end of the payment and there WILL NOT be any more compensations or payments thereafter for whatever reasons (to prevent extortion and stuff).

Black and white > verbal

But I would prefer to go the insurance way... I would end up be paying a premium anyway so it works out to be around the same... PLUS him driving his ute unrego'd will not go unnoticed. Ok, but that is IF Rob has comprehensive insurance.... else it's back to paying to settle privately.

Edited by E3lipse
Stinky Rooster Grand Master

Stinky Rooster

Posted
Posted

what part of "both drivers were uninsured" didnt you guys get?

At the risk of agreeing with spremy (Mr Eps) if the other guy was unrego'ed then tell him to suck a dick, and if he doesnt like it, tell him to file a report with the police. Because of the lack of rego, the other car is immediately at fault for simply being on the road.

NISMOGTT Collaborator

NISMOGTT

Posted
Posted

what part of "both drivers were uninsured" didnt you guys get?

At the risk of agreeing with spremy (Mr Eps) if the other guy was unrego'ed then tell him to suck a dick, and if he doesnt like it, tell him to file a report with the police. Because of the lack of rego, the other car is immediately at fault for simply being on the road.

100% agree - tell the guy to file a report against you as he should not have been on the road... he wont dob himself in

Hey officer i was driving an un rego car and had a crash can you help.... duh no brainer really...

Mr Eps Grand Master

Mr Eps

Posted
Posted

what part of "both drivers were uninsured" didnt you guys get?

At the risk of agreeing with spremy (Mr Eps)

Dale you realize this is like the 7th time that you have agreed with me....

.....

soon.jpg?1303752617

djr81 Grand Master

djr81

Posted
Posted

fk him, dont pay him a cent,

Car is unlicensed.. shouldnt be on the road

Does he have his license also??

So on that basis anyone who, say, runs into a technically unroadworthy Nissan Skyline should tell the driver to:

A) fk off

B) suck a dick

Just asking.

Hanaldo Grand Master

Hanaldo

Posted
Posted

So on that basis anyone who, say, runs into a technically unroadworthy Nissan Skyline should tell the driver to:

A) fk off

B) suck a dick

Just asking.

That is so completely different, I don't even know where to start :/

HR_31GT Contributor

HR_31GT

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Still waiting for him to report it,

Funnily enough, he has now rego'd his car this morning.

He did say, that he was "able" to drive the car between the dates of 5th of Aug to the 28th of Aug, But even that doesn't make sense as the 15 day "grace" period for insurance cover over here would cut off on the 20th, and the crash happened 2 days after that.

StevenCJR31 Veteran

StevenCJR31

Posted
Posted

if the other guys car wasnt regoed at the time of the crash then he hasnt got a legal leg to stand on and you SHOULDNT have to give him a bent cent. . .talk to the DPI and the coppers before any money changes hands

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • funkymonkey
      Returning after a long time!

      By funkymonkey · Posted

      Por que no los dos? At least my euro brawler is reliable - unlike the JDMs I've had. Sheraaz you look familiar, did you ever come to an SAU VIC meet aaaaaages ago?
    • funkymonkey
      Phone photo thread

      By funkymonkey · Posted

      Drove to Cape Schanck to try to get a nice clear southern view over the ocean to see the lights a couple of days ago... instead got crappy cloud cover. Photo of a diorama of Hong Kong street scene. Taken on an iPhone 13 Pro Max.
    • GTSBoy
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Stock RB fuel pressure is near enough 43.5 psi, so the latency in that table at 31.6 will be close. You can see that 7 or 8 psi equates to about 0.4µs extra latency. So if you wanted to interpolate between the 31.6 and 39.9 psi values you could say you're going up about 2 psi out of those 8, so add about 0.1µs, which is barely worth talking about and is quite possibly wrong because ideally you would fix the latency while running at the appropriate conditions on the dyno, with a wideband sniffing its butt.
    • MBS206
      R32 GTS (RB20DE) Injectors Replacement

      By MBS206 · Posted

      The pressure, is what you set the fuel pressure to. If you have the factory fuel reg, you'll need to find the factory spec. I don't know it off the top of my head, but someone else might.
    • MBS206
      Belt flex under throttle

      By MBS206 · Posted

      For others, what GTSBoy states here should be paid attention. Why? Well lots of people play with different engines, and they LOVE to change things like remove AC, or steering pumps etc, and it lends to them needing to move the tensioner too. You want your tensioner, particularly those that are sprung or hydraulically tensioned, to be the first thing after the harmonic balancer, or technically the "last" pulley in the chain. By saying last pulley, I mean look at the direction the crank spins when the engine is running, follow the belt from where the crank is pulling the belt FROM, and keep following that until you're between the last pulley/accessory on the belt and about to reach the crank again, this is the spot where you put the tensioner. This is the area that will always end up with slack. This is worked out exactly the same way for chains too, as the physics is the same for them. The crank pulley is where all the force to drag the belt around comes from. You will never ever get rid of the slack that appears, especially under load. The tensioners job is to keep the belt loose enough when stationary that there shouldn't be out of sync movement in slow movement, and then be tight enough when running, that the belt can't jump off any gear and get damaged. Too tight, bad things happen, too loose, bad things happen. Have a tensioner (mainly sprung/hydraulic one) in the wrong spot, it can't actually do anything about keeping the tension.
×
×
  • Create New...