Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

as the title says what would cause this. i was thinking thermostat so i will change that tommorow. is there any other factors which could cause this. my water pump has just started noticeably leaking. could this cause it ? also out of curiousty has any one ever had really bad fuel economy and then fixed it. the mechanic thinks everything is fine but only 250ks to a tank :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375157-no-pressure-in-radiator-hoses/
Share on other sites

+1

Cap creates the pressure in the system. The pump only creates flow. Depending on the size of the leak that may have an affect but it sounds like it's only dribbling out the telltale so shouldn't affect pressure to much. But that said if it's leaking you will have to change it out. May as well do the timing belt etc while your at it unless that has only recently been done

As for fuel economy, depends how you drive and what conditions occur when your driving, e.g traffic, highway driving

If you boost lots you will chew fuel. You could have a faulty O2 sensor, also try resetting your ECU as it's easy to do (that is if you have a standard ECU)

if you have an aftermarket ECU then the tune might be to rich

Edited by 89CAL

A small leak can very easily result in you having no pressure.

The leak is only small because there is no pressure, there is no pressure because there is a leak etc... etc...

I just replaced my radiator because it had a small leak out of a tiny crack, cap was fine but system was never really under pressure.

Thermostat only regulates temperature, does not affect pressure. So only replace it if it is broken.

+1 for O2 sensor on the end of its life could also be combined with temp sensor not having a correct reading (your coolant system isn't 100%) and therefore always keeping it a bit rich (is your idle always high even after car is hot, like over 1k RPM? that could be a sign of temp sensor not reporting correctly).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...