Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

Quick question, just received my overhaul kit from my mechanic on the list we made we settled on 1.8mm gasket i was told i would need it to push alot of boost into the engine so i agreed since im going for decent power i would need it!

now i got the kit and i noticed the head gasket it 1.5 mm i questioned him about it... he said ( sorry they dont have 1.8mm i talked to my tuner he said its good not to worry)

im asking here coz i know hes full of shit lol standard being 1.2mm is 1.5 big enough to get me 350awkw with good boost or do i need the 1.8 mm ? btw its a Series 3 R33 GTR

cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/375828-tomei-head-gasket/
Share on other sites

20thou oversized cp pistons eagle rods full tomei gasket kit inc sump baffel, greddy oil pump tomei restrictor , havent got harmonic yet but properly ati ....N1 waterpump.... pritty much good bottom end...top end hasent been decided yet but yeh -5's im happy with so far might change my mind still doing research on what turbos... on and id2000s with a good pump setup also

havent decided mate...but not going ported or anything like that just standard valves just chuking in some cams doing a valve grind n so on... simple shit really

Look all i want to know is if i should sell the 1.5 n get the 1.8 is it worth it so cbf having a mass convo about it..

Well you are increasing the combution chamber capacity when you go a thicker headgasket (unless you have custom pistons that protrude above the deck anymore then normal), which means a lower static compression ratio which means less power in NA form or off boost form. Thats what makes the engine doughier until you start jamming boost in there.

honestly you should be thankful you couldn't get the 1.8mm. it's just not needed and isn't going to make your engine seal any better. as R33 said all it does is increase chamber volume which reduces your compression ratio which means less power/response off boost. you would only need a 1.8mm if you wanted to perhaps run like 40spi or if you had custom pistons that needed that extra bit of clearance.

a 1.2mm would have been fine but since you have the 1.5mm now by all means just use that.

Headgasket size needs to be decided once everything else is taken into account as r33_racer said.

Depends on the comp ratio the motor is being build too which included the bottom and top ends to "work" together.

You are sorta going it a bit backwards if you don't know whats being done with the head yet.

Even with a 1.8mm you won't be running 28psi on PULP through -5s for a start with a basic head. All for 350rwkw is odd too as you could do that on 18psi with a stock motor :ermm:

I'd be a little concerned about the build with the 'advice' being given out thus far.

Im building it myself...im an apprentice mech... dont know to much about the smaller details but i do a bit of reconditioning eg head work and bottom end stuff at work so i have a decent idea....

alot of people are scared but look im gona cut my teeth on these engines i love them to death and their all i think about honestly even my misses craks the shits...i bought my manuals from jpnz chassis and engine manuals im gona do alot of reading and build it so dont mention comp ratios yadda yadda im gona get the block honed machined if it needs and balanced and then ima wet and dry it a bit slap the gasket on strip the head clean it up put new seals thu it valve grind so on and slap that on...... simple question was if the 1.5 was ok to use to push high boost into i was just a little curious...

i dont feel like im going bakwards ? the standard head flows fine i think? with a set of cams (custom made not off the shelf) and some gears the right tuner should get me some good results dont u think ?

ill be asking alot more questions so i might make a thred about my build in the overhaul section so i can ask people there aswell

thanks for the help guys :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yep, pretty much what you said is a good summary. The aftermarket thing just attached to the rim, then has two lines out to valve stems, one to inner wheel, one to outer wheel. Some of the systems even start to air up as you head towards highway speed. IE, you're in the logging tracks, then as speeds increase it knows you're on tarmac and airs up so the driver doesn't even have to remember. I bet the ones that need driver intervention to air up end up seeing a lot more tyre wear from "forest pressures" in use on the highway!
    • Yes, but you need to do these type certifications for tuning parts. That is the absurd part here. Meaning tuning parts are very costly (generally speaking) as well as the technical test documentation for say a turbo swap with more power. It just makes modifying everything crazy expensive and complicated. That bracket has been lost in translation many years ago I assume, it was not there.
    • Hahaha, yeah.... not what you'd call a tamper-proof design.... but yes, with the truck setup, the lines are always connected, but typically they sit just inside the plane of the rear metal mudguards, so if you clear the guards you clear the lines as well. Not rogue 4WD tracks with tree branches and bushes everywhere, ready to hook-up an air hose. You can do it externally like a mod, but dedicated setups air-pressurize the undriven hubs, and on driven axles you can do the same thing, or pressurize the axles (lots of designs out there for this idea)... https://www.trtaustralia.com.au/traction-air-cti-system/  for example.... ..the trouble I've got here... wrt the bimmer ad... is the last bit...they don't want to show it spinning, do they.... give all the illusion that things are moving...but no...and what the hell tyre profile is that?...25??? ...far kernel, rims would be dead inside 10klms on most roads around here.... 😃
    • You're just describing how type certification works. Personally I would be shocked to discover that catalytic converter is not in the stock mounting position. Is there a bracket on the transfer case holding the catalytic converter and front pipe together? If so, it should be in stock position. 
    • You talking about the ones in the photo above? I guess that could make sense. Fixed (but flexible) line from the point up above down to the hubcap thingo, with a rotating air seal thingo. Then fixed (but also still likely flexible) line from the "other side" of the transfer in the hub cap thingo up to the valve stem on the rim. A horrible cludge, but something that could be done. I'd bet on the Unimog version being fed through from the back, as part of the axle assembly, without the need for the vulnerable lines out to the sides. It's amazing what you can do when you have an idea that is not quite impossible. Nearly impossible, but not quite.
×
×
  • Create New...