Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

cheers dude, its going to be hard work getting it roadworthy'd over here though sadly..

fibreglass wings, bonnet and decklid, lexan windows, huge roll cage, fuel cell and lots of original metal cut out for weight saving.. 4" narrowed beam, raised gearbox are all going to be ball ache to get certified over here :(

Bought this in '12 to replace my '01 R1 which was stolen:

l3uVzPs.jpg

It was in sterling condition which was a shame because my bikes tend to cop a pretty tough life so I replaced the schmick stock fairings with some ebay second hand ching chong stuff and stashed the stock stuff.

The ebay stuff is Hanspree race colours but it now looks like this:

Z8jBmp2.jpg

Thanks to $70 worth of plasti-dip.

Also picked myself up a new daily as I recently changed roles and am out and about each day in a suit. The Stag doesn't like daily duties so behold, it's daily replacement!

v4TJpEJ.jpg

A cracking little car. I love driving it. It's a SSS with the CVT (stuff driving a manual in peak hour every day). In manual form it would be an absolute riot. It's still pretty bloody good in CVT form.

  • 1 year later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Means something is not set up right, tune/calibration related.  
    • Finally replaced the previous temporary mesh indicator surrounds (temporary was the last 10+ years 😂) with a 3D printed GTR style version for the front indicators. I think it looks a lot nicer than the old setup and at least the indicators now point in the correct direction rather than angled off. Needed a little bit of tweaking to deal with the intercooler piping but got there in the end. Old and new photos below. 
    • It's weird to me that you say this because I'm pretty sure locals with relatively standard standalone tunes (boost/barometric compensated alpha-N) still have driveability issues when they pop intercooler hoses. Maybe with enough data I can just train some kind of model that spits out an expected grams/cyl given every sensor input except MAF like what FCA did with their Pentastar 3.6 ECU logic. Basically stock everything. The main motivation honestly is to have a sensor that can be a decent baseline source of truth. In scenarios you're describing obviously it won't work every time but it seems to me the number of corner cases that exist in MAF load is maybe not as severe and difficult to manage vs ITB alpha-N with some MAP/barometric compensation.
    • What are your plans for your blow off valves? Purely plumb back? How soft will the spring in them be? AFM can be tricky to get super smooth and nice, especially depending on the rest of the system, and then can be very easily upset if something slightly changes. IE, even if you run recirc blow off valves, you could still see issues getting it to behave at certain load points as turbos might start to spool, but you release the throttle but it's not enough pressure to crack the bov open to recirc, and you can end up with reversion which can cause double metering, and hence dumping of fuel into the system, and stalling the engine.   If you're going to run a map sensor for closed loop boost control from the ECU, what makes you want to keep the AFM?    
    • It's not bad, it's just not flexible. And say if you have any leaks between the MAF and plenum, well then your load axis goes out the window. Here's a real world scenario, I blew off an intercooler hose last track day, as the clamp decided to Bluetooth itself somewhere. Still continued to do 2 laps and drive it to the pub for a couple of beers then home. Good luck doing that with a MAF setup 
×
×
  • Create New...