Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have a Precision 6262 on my R32 GTR now. Making 355kw - 475hp at all four wheels on 20psi running BP Ultimate.

Comes on hard from 3500rpm so no less lag then the twin HKS GT-SS I previously had. I went for the 6262 over the 6265 as i was worried about the lag for street use.

gtr32g do you have dyno sheet showing reference to boost power and rpm? I was seriously concidering a 6765 for more power over my 35r but after reading that link I might steer clear :(

gtr32g do you have dyno sheet showing reference to boost power and rpm? I was seriously concidering a 6765 for more power over my 35r but after reading that link I might steer clear :(

Next time im at my tuner will get a copy printed off and send you a pm.

Out of interest sake, Precision are now releasing versions previously with the "65" hotside with a "66" billet "CEA" turbine, which they claim more hp with similar or better response. This means the PT6265 and PT6765 could be superceeded with the PT6266 and PT6766...

I have a Precision 6262 on my R32 GTR now. Making 355kw - 475hp at all four wheels on 20psi running BP Ultimate.

Comes on hard from 3500rpm so no less lag then the twin HKS GT-SS I previously had. I went for the 6262 over the 6265 as i was worried about the lag for street use.

Enough said...

6262 6265 difference is minimal in response anyway.

  • 3 weeks later...

a few of us are using the precision turbos and couldent be happier with the way they perform, my rb26 with a 6765 T3 .82 made a lazy 600rwhp on 26psi, another mates 26/30 with the same turbo makes 600rwhp on 26psi, we also put a 6262 T4 .84 on my old man's 32GTR and with a peice of shit hks log manifold made an easy 500hp @ the wheels on only 19psi on straight 98 pump fuel with stock bottem end, good proof for the people whinging about having to run 35psi and e85 to get good power results.. its a load of bullshit, my mate with the 26/30 gained 40hp @ the wheels with a 2psi boost increase, and during tuning his car was making 430rwhp on something like 14psi. these turbos dont stop making power, you can just keep going and going and the car will just keep making power.

a few of us are using the precision turbos and couldent be happier with the way they perform, my rb26 with a 6765 T3 .82 made a lazy 600rwhp on 26psi, another mates 26/30 with the same turbo makes 600rwhp on 26psi, we also put a 6262 T4 .84 on my old man's 32GTR and with a peice of shit hks log manifold made an easy 500hp @ the wheels on only 19psi on straight 98 pump fuel with stock bottem end, good proof for the people whinging about having to run 35psi and e85 to get good power results.. its a load of bullshit, my mate with the 26/30 gained 40hp @ the wheels with a 2psi boost increase, and during tuning his car was making 430rwhp on something like 14psi. these turbos dont stop making power, you can just keep going and going and the car will just keep making power.

Just saw your graph in the RB26 upgrade thread... What diff ratio do you have?

  • Like 1

these results impress me alot, and as u said aload of crap but running big boost to see power..

i think it just comes down to some peoples tune or set up being wrong for those who arnt making the power...

these results also back up all the power figues the guys make in there supras on supraforums.com, if u get a chance and sign up on that site and go to the dyno tuning section

theres so much interesting reading on pt 6265-6266, 6567 and 6566 and 7175 on both pump and e85, most of there supras are making 700-900 rwhp with 67mm turbos- INCREDIBLE

get on board :)

I have a Precision 6262 on my R32 GTR now. Making 355kw - 475hp at all four wheels on 20psi running BP Ultimate.

Comes on hard from 3500rpm so no less lag then the twin HKS GT-SS I previously had. I went for the 6262 over the 6265 as i was worried about the lag for street use.

I'd like to see a dyno sheet.... 6262 is not GT-SS response... I've driven 2 GTR's with 6262 PT turbos is two difernet trims.. they were laggier. They're not a bad turbo as compared to some of the PT range.

700USAHP = 500 AUS HP

Yeah... if your lucky. seen a couple of '1000hp' honda's with stock gearboxes.. ha ha ha ha

700USAHP = 500 AUS HP

i think thats a lil exadurated... if this was true they wouldnt b running 140-150 mph, yes they r manual but they r also weighty...

we could argue bout this for days, but there strip times back up the dyno figures...

so many haters of the pt range out there :(

i think thats a lil exadurated... if this was true they wouldnt b running 140-150 mph, yes they r manual but they r also weighty...

we could argue bout this for days, but there strip times back up the dyno figures...

so many haters of the pt range out there :(

its all good though, the haters can hate. more performance gains for you and me my friend ...

PJ, can u shed anymore light on the "6766" im so keen to get a 6765 on my 2.8 but if this is close to coming out and out performs ill lean towards the newer

Hi Jake, I haven't been involved with Precision as I was earlier this year, but it doesn't change my opinion on them one bit which was based on real experiences with the cars I had driven and the two Precision's I've had on my own car.

Sure US figures spell out some pretty serious GST to us, but that's with all readings on particular dyno's.

That's why we bit the bullet and tried everything for ourselves on local soil.

It's hard to understand the BS that people have written about them, but I figure people can think what they like, we're the ones laughing in the end :action-smiley-069:

Edited by PJ.

I don't doubt some of them are making the numbers...just a lot of BS comes from the land of yank

eg, I saw 1 "result" of a Gt2871 on a SR20 making 500rwhp...now we all know that isn't going to happen. SO anything out of the US is disregard until there are a number of results here locally of similar nature.

P.J not taking anything away from you, but we never got to see the S14 run, all we got was a few dyno sheets, which I'm sure you know are easy to fudge (my 33 "made" 400rwkws with a stock turbo)

Which is why, we are "haters"

Its just a natural reaction for everyone who has grown up in the era of infomertials to not want this "super mega awesome best ever product" just because a couple of workshops say they are the best thing ever

If we could see some normal results, at low boost levels, I can only speak for myself here, I would start to take a more objective view

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I haven’t taken them out of the cases yet    inside the box is this packaging which is pretty much like a massive blister pack 
    • Purchased a NC MX5 a while ago Basic suspension mods done, BC coils and Whiteline sway bars  New DBA calipers, discs and pads Added some 17 x 8 Konig Decagrams with 215/45 17 PS5's Added some typical NA bolt on's, i.e. full exhaust and intake  Added 0.5ltrs with a MZR2.5 swap, nice bump in torques  Found a detachable hard top which is locked in for a colour match with my local paint shop in Feb 25, this also includes some PDR as it has received a few love taps from parking in the local shops when in the hands of my Minister for War and Finances, me, I park nowhere near other cars and typically park on the street The little thing is awesome, I drive it everywhere, it handles like a dream whether I'm up it or just cruising  But now,  because I'm a idiot, I keep looking at turbo kits....... did I mention I'm a idiot Why is dose so appealing  All of the NA 2.5 glory, well.......until sometime in 2025 anyway....🤪  
    • I would not be surprised if you are the only person on earth that has the interest/desire to do that lol.  The Haltech base map is a really good starting point, the car will fire easily and drive very well, even on mild boost levels. To me, following your advice sounds like some sort of ancient Chinese water torcher lol (this is not an insult Josh, never change <3)
    • Those car show concepts from the 2000's and 2010's like the Floria and IDx were brilliant and should've gone ahead, at least one of them. But neither Honda nor Nissan are thinking about affordable performance any more, which is truly sad.  Even if Toyota's liquid hydrogen ICE development reaches the point where it's commercially viable and the infrastructure to support it, Honda/Nissan would have to wait until Toyota allow fee access to their patents to offer it with any smaller performance models they released to take advantage of it.  
    • A sporty manual RWD coupe with a IL4 Honda engine would only be a good thing I assume we won't see anything released for a few years though, unless informal talks and designs have been going on for a few years,  and due to the current, and future, emmisions and safety requirements, I assume anything "sporty" they would do would be at least some hybrid thingie And hopefully anything they are thinking of has nice lines, without lots of plastic and fake bits hanging off it like that horrendous FK8 that looked like it was designed by a 13 year old The other issue of course in the current market is cost, currently the type R is around $70k, a twin is around $50k Meh, I'm old and grumpy and would rather buy a older model car and waste my coin on that than buying anything currently available new  
×
×
  • Create New...