Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

at last count the car was on sale for 90k, altho this was before the Nitrous was added... so we shall see...

Shan, The car was never on sale for 90k. A lot more than that has been spent on the car so figures are a bit blurry.

The car is for sale though and I have a number in my head which I'm asking for it.

If anyone is interested, drop me a PM and we can talk.

Here is the graph from MAS for ya.

MASDynoRead20040403.jpg

Enjoy.

my bad dave, coulda sworn last year at autosaon you told sum1 you wanted 90k, but that was a good year ago lol... time to start doin up your euro no :D

You are absoulately spot on summoner,

For a national event of this magnitude, it's a piss weak effort to hire a dynolog, especially if the software is limited to 200kph.

Needless to say, big hp cars are big hp cars, it just make it harder to compare the results.

i think it's got more to do with which garage the organisers are good mates with rather than stict adherence to uniformity across the board. If Cabin were smart, they'd invest in a Dyno of their own (seeing that they do up to 7 shows a year not including semi's and finals). This would be ideal to take on tour with them.

Also quick question bout the Dyno Dynamics dynos... don't they need to be secured to the ground using underground bolts or something? Coz the one at MAS wasn't really secured to the gorund that well (and it couldn't have been because it was in the exhibition centre.

You and your .1 You do realise that for that 0.1 to mean anything you are talking about the dyno being accurate to less than 0.0167%!!!!!

:D:P;):) :)

That's what makes it so funny though!!! :rofl:

Emre! We are talking about car people here!!!

I mean every time I hear someone talk about an HR32 GT-R I want to stab them!

If that isn't being serious about a trivial detail then nothing is!

I am probably a bit too much of a tourist in this forum to pick up on in-jokes thought...

I think the most impressive thing about this car is for how long it has over 400rwkw!

Look at the meat in that graph - it's pretty easy to see that it isn't just a dyno queen!

Go Leewah - Go Fangartists! :D

matt

He heee...

Being serious about a dodgy dyno printout is a little contradictory, don't you think...? :P

I think everyone with half a brain figures out it's dodgy and just a joke within 10 seconds of seeing the dyno chart ;)

It's not meant to be serious, it's all in good fun :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...