Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Christian (Prank) & myself have been talking for a while now about starting a 'Review' type area of the forum/website. One that will link to the front page as better content that will be picked up by Google etc.

Basically review parts that you buy, take some video/photos & some quantifiable tests, then write up a review about it. Things like - did the product work as claimed, compare to other products, the quality of the product etc.

In the end scoring the product out of 5 stars or something. The write up would be submitted/checked and then posted up.

It could be any product as well. Things like brake kits, engine parts, tyres. Even car care products & audio.

I’m already in the process of writing one for a Brake Kit, and another member is reviewing a car Battery Charger.

The aim moving forward for this is that Companies/Manufacturers will approach us to review new products coming onto the market to help the community get a feel for it, and the world in general.

If you are interested in joining the SAU Review Crew – Then please post up. We would like some technical people only at this stage that can do the testing in a little bit of depth and don’t mind spending the time.

Maybe in the future it could be expended to attending events as Media for SAU and review those/write up about them.

If you have any ideas/feedback that would be good :)

Cheers

Ash

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I would think step 1 would be getting a template sorted for all reviews to follow. I think it works better if all reviews basically look the same (in layout terms) which will make it easier for the not only the person doing the review to make sure they aren't missing important info but also for others viewing the review so they have quick access to areas they consider important before reading the full review (eg Review summary, star rating, pros and cons etc).

I would also look into some form of Disclaimer stating the review is only the opinion of the person who has written the review and the situations they encountered, Opinions and Situations vary so SAU takes no liability if things turn out differently in your situation compared to the reviewers. Always best to cover your arse but your disclaimer can just be a footer on every review.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6036690
Share on other sites

Yeah the format, style etc will come with time.

For now we are just looking for people that are keen to get involved with it all.

Once there is a keen group we can workout what everyone thinks will work best, is easiest to follow/address and that type of thing. So kinda "next step" stuff.

Disclaimers aren't an issue :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6036796
Share on other sites

This sounds like a great idea. A database of dedicated product reviews would be a much better resource for someone researching theyre next mod rather than searching thousands of old threads for simmilar information.

A standardised template is also a good idea.

count me in :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6037814
Share on other sites

Yep definitely going to keep it unbias, that's a key aim.

Independent testing, review etc. Don't mind if someone that has a business wants to help. Import Monster have expressed interest in getting involved where possible. However they won't check their own product for instance.

Thanks for PMs so far, I will respond later in the week :)

Surely there must be more interested though? Plenty of people doing this all the time!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6043519
Share on other sites

It's really not. We are trying to do a good thing for the community, users etc. Its more than just products as Christian is also wanting to move towards event coverage and what not as well as stated.

We are sure there are people that would love to get involved with such an endeavour.

Let SAU worry about the legal stuff, we are certainly no stranger to any of that and know what we are doing.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6045910
Share on other sites

Not getting much feedback in Gen Auto - so moving to FI as there is much more "tech" people that might not check outside FI etc.

Shoot ideas though, post up comments and so on.

We'd like to get this off the ground soon as we can :thumbsup:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6056302
Share on other sites

how do we stop people with no idea giving reviews on turbo kits etc.

ie, some random buys turbo kit, has his uncles 2nd cousins neibour fit it up, and it ends up a shit fight, so the review comes back saying nothing fits etc etc.

I would be more in depth but ive had 4hrs sleep and cbf

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6056317
Share on other sites

Random users couldn't just submit a review :)

We are looking for people that obviously have a bit of history with SAU, like to tinker/review products and have some reasonable(to expert) technical knowledge or are getting workshops to fit them up.

Could be things like:

Intercooler comparo - back to back results same dyno/day

Brake kit review - Does the kit bolt up, measureable improvements in braking force

Exhaust review - Ease of fitment, measure the noise level exterior/interior, take some audio

Car body products - Like say "XXXXX" wax. Apply it and see how long it lasts. Is it easy to apply, does it last as long as the label says

Accessories - battery chargers for instance, similar to the above in that does it work/easy to use etc.

All reviews will be "reviewed" by the group before going public anyway. Idea would be it would be in a private area before being put onto the frontpage. There would be a set of minimum requirements to follow - that would be for the group to determine once this gets off the ground and of course will be fine tuned as time goes on and more feedback comes.

There will always be conjecture on results. Look at any product review site from PC parts to Musical instruments. Such debate is always going to occur.

The idea is just to give people an idea in a simple/easy categorised resource.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6056341
Share on other sites

Debate & discussion is healthy. So ye I think it should be open, and then obviously follow the board rules etc.

The product supplier could even say a few words as SAU Traders could submit new products/kits to the SAU Review Crew to gauge interest and so on and get feedback.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/378367-sau-review-team/#findComment-6056358
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Por qué no los dos? Body colour red with black stripes down centre, onto bonnet and bootlid.
    • From my bolts, standard M8 with 1.25mm thread pitch (M8x1.25mm).    Length is 19mm under the head and has a captive 18mm OD flat washer.   20mm length from a bolt shop is what you'll be able to get.   Make sure they're zinc plated.    If you're concerned about strength, grade 8.8 will be more than enough. Original PN is 01121-04971.  Now discontinued according to Amayama but that's because it's one of the parts that's been captured by the Heritage program, which explains the ridiculous price.   New PN is 01121-RHR20: https://nismodirect.com/nismo-heritage-bolt-pin-hinge-hood-bnr32-nissan-skyline-gt-r-01121-rhr20-01121-04971/ About AUD33 converted from Yen in the above link but that's just one example. Interesting that the hinge-to-body bolts are still available non-heritage.....PN 08116-8161G around $2 each (amayama).    Same thread but 16mm long.
    • Well, if that filter was impeding fluid flow, then it could have similar effects to faulty solenoids. The TCU will register a fault when it does something (ie, changes the state of a solenoid) and does not detect the required result. If there are other causes that can make the same lack of result, then they will be indistinguishable to the expected cause for which the TCU has a code.
    • Yellowjackets, red ones, blue ones (other than Splitfire) have all been demonstrated to be unreliable on turbo engines. That unreliability can be anything from outright failure (ie, 4 out of a set of 6 working out of the box) to just not being strong enough for the task, on a boosted engine. Not enough of us care about NA engines to know whether that unreliability is an issue for the undemanding needs of an NA RB20. I should think though that the DIS-008 should fit the 20. There's not really any reason for the head/coil mounting area to be any different on those 2 Neos. I wouldn't be buying Splitfires, or any other old tech coilpack, for a car in this day and age though. I would buy modern pencil coils and do what needs to be done to adapt them to the loom. That's relatively trivial these days, with numerous kits for fitting R35, or Audi, or Yaris/Corolla coils.
    • Keen to see how much work is needed to get an abandoned Skyline going. My R32 has been sitting idle for three years or so but finally got some time to get it going again. (Also lurking SAU and trying to hit 10 posts so I can start my own intro thread with pics)
×
×
  • Create New...