Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I have one sitting on my workbench, it's definitely nylon or some kind of plastic. It blades certainly feel like plastic, they are even a bit bendy! And due the thinness of the leading edge of the blades you can actually see tiny indents in the plastic itself.

Mafia - they are really Nylon - i know it doesnt seem likely but I have swapped my stock turbo with another one plus seen a whole bunch of others at the wrecker first hand and in this case the internet is correct - take a look at one if you can and you will see that it is really some sort of black plastic.

I will have my turbo off in around 1 week and will happily post a photo of the compressor.

So you're just going from what the internet says, with nonform of confirmation, or have you actually touched one, and inspected one closely?

You obviously haven't. You also obviously don't realise how much stress a compressor wheel has to endure.

But then, going by your comments, they shouldnt believe what your saying either because its on the internet too. hehehe.

Is it possible that there was some uber new nylon composite created that does work? They had to change ball bearings to work in turbos because normal ones would explode under the conditions too.

Everything i have ever read, bar what you have just said, has stated that the stock compressor is a nylon composite thingy too. Not that i care.. i threw mine away already :D

It's an alloy. How can you spin nylon at 100,000rpm and have it not flex, warp, or fly to pieces?

Bulletproof vests? They're made from Kevlar, which is an aramid synthetic fibre. Stops bullets.

Lexan? Another polycarb resin thermoplastic. Used as aircraft canopies, space suit visors and.... bulletproof windows.

Tweeters? That's right, fully sick speakers capable of up to 65,000 Hz in response can be partially made from... you guessed it. Plastic. Polyethylene terephthelate to be precise. And to put that frequency into perspective, it's 3,900,000 RPM (or more correctly, Oscilliations Per Minute). It's also the same stuff that your coke bottles are made of; PET.

Annealed 6061-O Aircraft Grade Aluminium has a maximum tensile strength of 125 MPa. While polyamide-amide has a maximum tensile strength of 152 MPa. In the late 1980's Ford Motor Co. went on to build a plastic engine that produced 318BHP at 11,000RPM and redlined at ~14,000RPM. It only weighed 69kg's, as opposed to it's all-iron original of 188kg's. The only metal parts in the engine were metal cylinder sleeves, metal combustion chamber tops, metal piston crowns, bearings, valves and seats, and a stock 2.3L Pinto crankshaft. Nearly everything else in the engine, including the block, rods and piston skirts were made of Torlon thermoplastics - a polyamide-amide. Although that engine never went into a vehicle, Cosworth built a plastic engine based on the Cosworth BDA that weighed 78kg's. Plastic parts included the engine block, cam cover, air intake trumpets, intake valve stems, piston skirts and wrist pins, connecting rods, oil scraper piston rings, tappets, valve spring retainers and timing gears. The T616 HU04 car raced for two season, and finished with a best position of 3rd in class at the 1985 Road America 500.

Twin Turbo 3rd-Gen RX-7's had an abradeable lining on the compressor wheel to aid in creating a perfect seal to maintain compressor efficiency after thermal and centrifugal expansion. Jet engines also use the same technology.

There are countless instances in the world around us where plastics are doing some amazing things. Especially when you consider what we had 40 years ago. Plastics can be engineered to make use of the covalent bond between every single molecule, and as a general rule, covalent bonds are much stronger than metallic bonding. There are plastics that offer strength comparable to alloys while offering characteristics such as self lubrication, wear resistance, reduced weight and chemical resistance, which metals cannot offer. So take all this on board, and try to accept the fact that all my fun comes from a little nylon compressor wheel boosting me around...

Or we could all man up and buy a real turbo ie: something that you can definitely say "That shit aint plastic". I have a profound sense of relief now, knowing that I can boost my turbo to 25psi and beyond and not have it blow to pieces. Instead the worry has turned to the engine blowing itself to pieces when the turbo gets turned up to 25 psi and beyond.....

Ha ha im new to these forums but iv read alot of threads where "the mafia" gets shot down because his opinions are different to everyone else's

Anyway i called MTQ and they confirmed my turbo is high flowed, too bad the standard ecu hates it

Edited by Slattery Gts-t

Well Nathan, we're all walking the modified car path. But not all of us are as far ahead as you. The OP could have a highflowed turbo, so he's on the right track.

Yep you are right. I was being slightly sarcastic with my comment before. I guess that's hard to portray online. Nothing wrong with a highflow. I would have done it myself except I am chasing more power. biggrin.gif Hey I'm not that far ahead anyway. I only bought my car in March this year.

Not having a go at The Mafia but some of the stuff he says to people and the way he comes across sometimes is tactless. I think that conversation on here should be no different than face to face. I guess as long as your not name calling etc then it doesn't really matter what you say or how you come across tongue.gif

Out of the few series 2 and gtt turbos I've seen, theyve certainly looked steel to me. Even my 1996 was a steel wheel turbo. And it was all original. Had the jap papers to prove it.

And thats hardly the case slatterly - did you read a few threats where some wanker like yourself has posted for the 35,547th time that his car stalls because he's installed a bov on a system that wasn't meant to leak just to sound cool?

As I said, I've seen many gts-ts and gtts and never seen a plastic compressor. Either someone is playin tricks on me or it's just luck that some were steel.

Lol mafia I have seen one and yes it is some form of nylon/plastic, just because you haven't touched one doesn't mean they don't exist. As mentioned above there are plenty of synthetic materials that can be made with very high strengths.

Maybe try talking to people with some respect instead of carrying on screaming all the time and people won't jump at an opportunity to troll you.

Edited by Rolls

Lol mafia I have seen one and yes it is some form of nylon/plastic, just because you haven't touched one doesn't mean they don't exist. As mentioned above there are plenty of synthetic materials that can be made with very high strengths.

Maybe try talking to people with some respect instead of carrying on screaming all the time and people won't jump at an opportunity to troll you.

Haha +1 to all of that

Bulletproof vests? They're made from Kevlar, which is an aramid synthetic fibre. Stops bullets.

Lexan? Another polycarb resin thermoplastic. Used as aircraft canopies, space suit visors and.... bulletproof windows.

Tweeters? That's right, fully sick speakers capable of up to 65,000 Hz in response can be partially made from... you guessed it. Plastic. Polyethylene terephthelate to be precise. And to put that frequency into perspective, it's 3,900,000 RPM (or more correctly, Oscilliations Per Minute). It's also the same stuff that your coke bottles are made of; PET.

Annealed 6061-O Aircraft Grade Aluminium has a maximum tensile strength of 125 MPa. While polyamide-amide has a maximum tensile strength of 152 MPa. In the late 1980's Ford Motor Co. went on to build a plastic engine that produced 318BHP at 11,000RPM and redlined at ~14,000RPM. It only weighed 69kg's, as opposed to it's all-iron original of 188kg's. The only metal parts in the engine were metal cylinder sleeves, metal combustion chamber tops, metal piston crowns, bearings, valves and seats, and a stock 2.3L Pinto crankshaft. Nearly everything else in the engine, including the block, rods and piston skirts were made of Torlon thermoplastics - a polyamide-amide. Although that engine never went into a vehicle, Cosworth built a plastic engine based on the Cosworth BDA that weighed 78kg's. Plastic parts included the engine block, cam cover, air intake trumpets, intake valve stems, piston skirts and wrist pins, connecting rods, oil scraper piston rings, tappets, valve spring retainers and timing gears. The T616 HU04 car raced for two season, and finished with a best position of 3rd in class at the 1985 Road America 500.

Twin Turbo 3rd-Gen RX-7's had an abradeable lining on the compressor wheel to aid in creating a perfect seal to maintain compressor efficiency after thermal and centrifugal expansion. Jet engines also use the same technology.

There are countless instances in the world around us where plastics are doing some amazing things. Especially when you consider what we had 40 years ago. Plastics can be engineered to make use of the covalent bond between every single molecule, and as a general rule, covalent bonds are much stronger than metallic bonding. There are plastics that offer strength comparable to alloys while offering characteristics such as self lubrication, wear resistance, reduced weight and chemical resistance, which metals cannot offer. So take all this on board, and try to accept the fact that all my fun comes from a little nylon compressor wheel boosting me around...

This is the most accurate post I have seen on these forums for a long time.

Mafia, I know you don't like to believe stuff you read on the internet, but how about scholar articles, do they count? http://www2.dupont.com/Automotive/en_US/assets/downloads/nylon_under_hood.pdf

I have seen Nylon used in stressful conditions first hand, my dad owns a Stemme 10 VH-GTS motorglider:

stemme-3.jpg

The propeller on this glider is made of nylon composite, and reaches speeds during take-off of over 200,000rpm. During mid-air cruising use, the propeller generally operates at around 80,000rpm, and will happily spin at over 200,000rpm for hours. The only reason it doesn't is because the engine uses so much fuel to keep it spinning at those speeds, as well as the engines tendency to overheat due to being air-cooled. The longest recorded flight time is 14hrs, though that involved a lot of time as a pure-glider with the prop folded away. Dad and myself have personally flown to Broome in this glider, which was over 11 straight hours of the prop being operated at around 80,000rpm.

There are also nylon components in the fuselage of the glider, as well as the motor (for obvious reasons, being lightweight is incredibly important for these things). The con-rods and valve-stems being the ones under most stressful conditions, but also the exhaust and intake manifolds and some other parts.

I doubt the prop turns at 200,000rpm, the rotax 914 has a max crank rpm of 5800 (limited to max 5 mins) and an internal reduction gear of 1:2.273.

turning a prop at 200,000 rpm just isnt going to happen. That is way beyond supersonic. Also has a 2 speed prop.

Maybe you are confused with the 50:1 glide ratio, whih means for 1 ft drop in altitude you travel forward 50ft

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...