Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Will you be working at "The House of Stagea" tomorow? Might see if I can nip down for a perve...:whistling:

yup....he will be there...I have a couple of small projects on the run I want to finish and I'm sure his Aric wants to bolt all his bits back on.

yup....he will be there...I have a couple of small projects on the run I want to finish and I'm sure his Aric wants to bolt all his bits back on.

Fairy Muff... I'll give you a bell tomorrow.:thumbsup:

Its a great idea Dale, but there is stuff all room there. I'm running about 4 or 5 hoses in the area already.

What I really need to know is does it matter being before or after the AFM?

Ideally you want the BOV as close to the throttle body as possible and certainly between the afm and the throttle body.

The pulses reversing through the AFM would almost certainly cause issues.

1327738925[/url]' post='6207971']

Ideally you want the BOV as close to the throttle body as possible and certainly between the afm and the throttle body.

The pulses reversing through the AFM would almost certainly cause issues.

Yeah, that's the conventional thinking. Thing is, I has no bov now, and it doesn't seem to suffer any ill effects other than the comp surge. Nil afm issues. The afm will only read in one direction.

That's why I'm a bit puzzled.

because your afm is in the cooler pipe you can actually have an atmo bov if you wanted to, so long as its on the pressureised side of the Turbo (duh) and pre afm

At this position the afm hasn't metered the air yet so loosing it to atmo doesn't matter

You could also put a recirc bov here, or after the afm, but a recirc bov is probably best after the afm to prevent reversion and air going backwards through the afm on closed throttle

Yeah, that's the conventional thinking. Thing is, I has no bov now, and it doesn't seem to suffer any ill effects other than the comp surge. Nil afm issues. The afm will only read in one direction.

That's why I'm a bit puzzled.

So was there a question about where to locate it or are you happy with how the car runs? The reason you want it close the throttle is to release the pressure as early as possible to shorten the pressure wave. There are lots of cars that have the BOV located somewhere further away and it works but it is not ideal. Conventional thinking is there for a reason.

Last I checked pulses of air moving across the afm element, changes the afm voltage regardless of direction.

So was there a question about where to locate it or are you happy with how the car runs? The reason you want it close the throttle is to release the pressure as early as possible to shorten the pressure wave. There are lots of cars that have the BOV located somewhere further away and it works but it is not ideal. Conventional thinking is there for a reason.

Last I checked pulses of air moving across the afm element, changes the afm voltage regardless of direction.

Conventional thinking doesn't have the AFM 300mm from the TB and the intake about 1800mm from that. The afm is not designed to pick up air travelling in the opposite direction, it would be very much shielded from the path of the air reversed, thats what I figure when I look at the thing. At the moment I can't say there is any ill effects in driveability because of the air backing up, just the comp flutter, which is actually a little milder that what I initially thought.

If it was going to be easy, I'd put it before the AFM, problem is I have very little space there anymore.

Scotty, I do care about the noise. In Sydney run a external BOV and your classed as full hektic- bend over and get ready for the po po.... Funny thing is with the flutter, they would think its a BOV anyway.

Edited by PN-Mad

6780356387_788a58afbe.jpg

Cam, Below is what I had to do to the Fnt bar. nothing drastic - just one cl ip to go, and a bit of sanding to clear the top cooler pipe.

6780354307_91071caa03.jpg

6780352443_32e2dc6f2f.jpg

6780350463_d012e32a03.jpg

All done!

I'll get some underneath pics, just have to get it up the ramps!

Conventional thinking doesn't have the AFM 300mm from the TB and the intake about 1800mm from that.

Scotty, I do care about the noise. In Sydney run a external BOV and your classed as full hektic- bend over and get ready for the po po.... Funny thing is with the flutter, they would think its a BOV anyway.

Looks really neat Alex. Well done to all involved thus far.

What does HKS suggest re BOV, if anything? Surely they gave detailed engineering info, like how they acheived their design criteria for a truly bolt-on/no mods necessary kit such as yours, lol.

And you don't strike me as the fully hektic type that goes around looking for trouble. I'm sure there's a solution somewhere...

Cam, Below is what I had to do to the Fnt bar. nothing drastic - just one cl ip to go, and a bit of sanding to clear the top cooler pipe.

6780354307_91071caa03.jpg

6780352443_32e2dc6f2f.jpg

Thanks Alex. I was wondering how far the grill came back to the intercooler recently actually.

Oh, and nice little shroud/box for the pod, any point to the stock air funnel now though? are you going to route air from it to the pod?

No point really to the duct. Its not in there now. The pod gets heaps of fresh air from below, through the grill, and up near the wheel arch.

The shroud? Well, thats a custom M35 Garage HKS pro dealer part. ph34r.gif

Craig has taken to writing HKS on various things on my car now. I have to say the bracket he made up for the trans cooler is a work of art.

Edited by PN-Mad

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, that's grim. Something bad has been happening there.
    • Put an endoscope down the hole and saw this. Not quite all around the bore but a good 60% at least. Chin to the chest and towards further disappointments I guess.
    • 2 does "sort of" applies, maybe......but looking at what parts would be needed for the swap to get engineered, registered, and insured, and basically that's everything under the car, the modifications the make it legal would be problematic and horrendously expensive, all for a street car that just cruises around and hits a few twisty roads on the weekends Also, from looking at the NSW rules and Regs, with all modifications that is required just to make the car safe and not twist itself to pieces, and then actually get registered for street use, may still be impossible nowadays As for 1, when you add in a fresh engine, fresh transmission, rear cradle and diff, tailshaft, suspension, brakes, cooling, and all the other fabrication required, your probably looking at up to $100k to do it right, all for a 20 year old MX5 that is over engineered and you would never be able to actually use the power it has on the street, much like your beastie, which I love, but you actually track that thing and can use all of its powers in anger, in a safe environment  Hell, the old Bogan Cruise Ship had more power than I could use on the street, and in hindsight, I went a bit silly on that thing, it didn't really need the 500hp it had for what I actually used the car for, it was fun, but basically unusable on the street if you value your licence  As for cams, yeah, I'll probably book it in for them to get installed and tuned soonish, like next month after MX5 Mania are back at work....... and yes, I've already sent a email to bin the turbo quote and quote instead to install cams and a new Fluidampr balancer that will suit the 2.5 better than the OEM 2.0 balancer that is swapped over for the 2.5 install, as the balancer needs to get pulled to time the cams it's a while your in there sort of thing I did think a bit about flex fuel for a laugh, but being na, and no where really around locally anymore to get E85, I've binned that idea, so no sweet sweet corn smells are set for the car I wish E85 was more of a standard fuel, it's better for the environment, better for tuning, plus that sweet sweet smell we all love As for fitting in the family, that's not needed, as everyone in the family already owns a car that can seat 5 humans comfortably enough, the MX5 is "my toy" As for buying a car that is already built, nah, I would rather pick and choose my parts, I enjoy the process, and in the big picture, the additional cost is well worth the enjoyment, and the occasional frustration, I get out of doing it, albeit with other people spinning the spanners, and me, just paying the invoice 🤣
    • Excuse me, but 2) does apply 1) Would also apply if you consider how much is spent in the alternatives. Also there's the option of 3), buy one pre-built that you can put your family in (it's me, it's my car)   That said, I went on a ~500km drive the other day. I didn't use anything more adventurous than 3rd/4th gear at about ~3000RPM and 50% throttle and I was going as fast as anyone has any sense doing on a public road, with enough grip to the point where I didn't want to go any faster. I was obviously under the limit of the current car etc etc. MX5 with 2.5 N/A to achieve the same speed would be more fun for any road scenario. Maybe consider cams. I wouldn't boost it. The use case is just not there and it won't actually make the car more enjoyable unless you really do plan on wringing gears from 1st to 3rd (at least) at 100% WOT on a public road to 150+kmh.
    • Great if: 1. You had all of the money for everything else that is required  2. Lived in a country where you could actually do this and drive it legally on the road Sadly, neither applies to me As for the turbo, I am having second thoughts, mainly for engineering/registration legality reasons and insurance  Not saying I've finished doing stupid things that I probably should do to the MX5, but boost, and V8 engine swaps isn't on the cards Strange, but true 
×
×
  • Create New...