Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have the best of both worlds then! And no silly stripes to go with it!

nismo_tiida_s_450-op.jpg

By the way- Boost is a steady 0.35BAR, or 5 PSI. I'm not using over 4000rpm, and I'm going to check the stock injector (320cc) duty cycle soon. Stock Computer is dumping a lot of fuel into it, fuel consumption is..... interesting. But over all, its totally drivable at the moment.

By the way- Boost is a steady 0.35BAR, or 5 PSI. I'm not using over 4000rpm, and I'm going to check the stock injector (320cc) duty cycle soon. Stock Computer is dumping a lot of fuel into it, fuel consumption is..... interesting. But over all, its totally drivable at the moment.

Interesting, but don't you mean 370cc?

I'm pretty sure that the VQ35de has the same sized injectors as VQ25det.

From recent testing at APS the stock VQ fuel injector flows 328 cc at 100% duty cycle at 43.5 psi fuel pressure, 376 cc at 100% duty cycle at 58 psi fuel pressure and 412 cc at 100% duty cycle at 72.5 psi fuel pressure.

linky

They wouldn't bother with the ghey market....

HKS is to busy building stuff like this...

HKS R34 GT-R

HKS-BNR34-268.jpg

Wonder where I can get some HKS Stripes...?ninja.gif

Lolz

Is that it?....taxicab chassis for the broz!

What about the gt500 stuff?

hmm... fair enough... quick check of FAST resulted in;

PM35 injector part number is 16600-CD70A and is used in Z33, J31, F50 etc. Basically everything that is running a VQ35de.

NM35 injector part number is 16600-AA500 and is used in F50 (VQ30det), R34 (RB25det) and Y61 (TB48de).

Now to back track and find where I thought/read that they used the same injectors wacko.gif

Trick for new players- do up your trans cooler clamps tight when they are nice and hot! whistling.gif

I played Hansel and Gretel all round Sydney with Matic J yesterday. Anyways, noticed a puddle in the garage this arvo, sorted it out. Thought it was engine oil to start with, glad it wasn't!

Now have a nice layer of underbody rust protection!

Exciting news!

UPREV have patched my ECU. It now appears on the webpage for supported vehicles. I received an email for Mark @ Abbey Motorsports in the UK telling me of the good news. I now have a tunable ECU map, a "back to stock" map.

Now I just have to pay up, refresh my licence arrangements, and I'll be tunable!

tongue.gif

Bit of progress today.

A couple of days ago I re-flashed the ECU. Just with the stock values, but with the throttle restriction removed, Speed limited to 300km/hph34r.gif, and a little adjustment of the rev limit/fuel cut/ throttle cut. All went successfully.

I have been having a problem with the ECU learning some strange fuel settings on closed loop. Basically what was happening was that on closed loop, Bank 2 was running a lot richer than Bank 1. it was about 80%/120% ratio. It didn't occur when the ECU was just fresh, but when it had driven for ~150kms, and the ECU learnt it. At the time it was stock ecu, not re-flashed at all. When it went open loop, it was fine. It spat a U1000 error, which is CAN bus error. Now nothing is wrong with the CAN bus, but what triggers that code, is when the ECU doesn't receive data from the emissions diagnostics for more than 2 seconds. So I went searching today- first port of call the bank 2 wideband sensor. When I pulled it apart it seemed ok, but the little rubber thingo in there wasn't sitting quite right so I pushed it all the way to the bottom, cleaned the plugs out and reconnected it. Also found a nipple in the intake tubes wasn't tight, so tightened that up. Anyways, the problem is absent now, I haven't put that many kms on it yet since the last "clear learned fuel" but I am optimistic that it will stay away. Idle is nice and smooth now, and while there is a little inconsistency,its not much, and doesn't appear when the car is at cruise with light throttle.

I want to know that the problem is gone, before I proceed with 600cc Injectors and fuel pump and tuning, as that would just exasperate the issue.

Also wired up my boost gauge, so now I know wtf is going on at night too!

Thought my exhaust was quiet- so got one of those Apps that measure Db. Don't know how accurate they are, but hey.

Measured according to the testing procedures- Exhaust height, 45 degree angle, 500mm away from tips

Measured 90db @ 4000rpm.

Legal ! banana.gif

Ok, some pics.

Any questions, ask away-

6839443439_41e60411e1.jpg

6839442021_e14db70f61.jpg

6839440171_a107fa0ec8.jpg

6839436613_31ac64976d.jpg

6839434901_3db946f224.jpg

This is the oil feed for the turbo- its a t piece off the oil pressure sender.

6839431167_9b83b217bc.jpg

Craig has taken to writing HKS on various parts of my car- ie- the trans cooler bracket.tongue.gif

6839432851_45bb26e17a.jpg

That HKS bracket is now worth huge dollars.thumbsup.gif

It might be worth tracking down some stainless cable ties, http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/20-STAINLESS-STEEL-THERMAL-CABLE-TIES-35-CM-EXTRACTORS-DUMP-PIPE-/220948422796?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item33718d608c#ht_500wt_1287 or tie wiring the heat shielding around the cables running near the exhaust housing and under the wastegate pipework. Once you get on the dyno; I don't think they'll last long.

Even if they don't melt, they'll go brittle and crack off in no time.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Jap premium will be 100 RON. You should use 98.
    • The exhaust gases are at their highest temperature as they leave the exhaust port and enter the manifold. They cool as they flow through the manifold because they transfer heat to the manifold and the manifold loses heat to the surrounding environment. Thus, inevitably, the exhaust gases are cooler as they enter the turbo compared to when they entered the exhaust manifold. So, yes, the exhaust manifold can easily get as hot as the turbine housing. Having said that, you will generally see the highest temperatures where the exhaust gases have to slow down or they are concentrated into one area - which is usually the collector on the manifold and in the turbine housing, because the gases slam into the metal at those places, increasing the convective heat transfer coefficient and transferring even more heat to the metal than they might just flowing past elsewhere. Exhaust manifold heat shields are a good idea - certainly for the stock manifold they are there from the factory. People seldom have anything like that on a tubular manifold because they are hard to achieve. Some might wrap a tube manifold with fibreglass tape - but this has a reputation of leading to cracked welds. The best case is generally to put ceramic coating onto the manifold to prevent it getting as hot (internal coating) and radiating/convecting heat into the bay (external coating). All the real heat from a turbo comes from the exhaust side. The gases entering are at ~800-900°C and the steel/iron gets nearly that hot. The compressor side is only going to heat the charge air up to <<200°C (typically not much more than 100°C). So that's nothing, by comparison. The compressor is not a significant source of engine bay heat.
    • Late to the party, specifically joined this forum as I just bought one of these and this thread has been a gold mine of info. If the OP is still around, mind if I ask what gas you been putting in yours? Mine has a Japanese sticker in the cap saying premium but it seems to get way worse mileage on premium (95) than 91. I always thought it was meant to be the other way round🤷 I do think Nissans claimed "6l/100km" is a bit fantastical 😂
    • Does exhaust manifold get hot as turno exhuast side? I have a turbo cover to managr heat in the engine bay but  nothing is covering the exhaust manifold before turbo   i know as turbo does compress air, the temp does go up however does that mean exhaust manifold would be as hot?
    • It's excellent but I'm still breaking it in so I'm not 100% sure where it'll end up. I would say it's about 15% heavier than stock and the smoothness of the slip zone is quite progressive but you need to be a little patient compared to stock or it'll bite hard and stall. Stock I got away with absolutely horrid clutch control. Like I said before I couldn't even tell where the clutch would grab when it was stock so releasing way too quickly without enough revs it would just slip and the revs would drop lower than ideal but that would be the end of it. Currently there's a bit of a nasty clutch judder if I don't apply enough revs + find the exact wrong point of the slip point in the clutch pedal but it feels like it's slowly resolving as I drive it more. I would not recommend the competition clutch unless you really need the extra clamp force. I think this clutch combined with the Nismo operating cylinder is going to be exactly what I want. Enough bite that you need to remember the release point to avoid stalling or rough shifts, but progressive enough that it's not hard to drive by any means and not heavy at all. I tried a "super single" clutch on my friend's 997.2 Turbo 6MT and that was absolutely horrid. It runs an electrohydraulic power steering pump for the clutch power boost so there's zero feedback in the clutch pedal and there was a horrific clutch shudder well after break-in due to the lack of marcel springs or hub springs in the friction disk. It felt like the slip zone was the thickness of a single toe twitch as well so it was almost impossible to avoid stalling it unless you gave it a ton of revs and just dumped the clutch instead of trying to be smooth with it. I was terrified of pulling out in front of traffic. I have also tried some kind of "super single" on an EK9 and that makes this twin plate Coppermix look like a stock clutch. Releasing the clutch pedal even slightly too quickly feels like you're getting rear-ended. The pedal is extremely heavy as well and there's no vacuum assist like the GTR.
×
×
  • Create New...