Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If the f#*kers installed a E85 pump somewhere in my part of Australia, I might lean that way. :whistling:

I found a G35 running stock block - 10psi, 22 degrees timing at redline up from 18, and making 414rwhp. Dunno what fuel, but thats a lot of timing in it.

Effectively you can see the octane of the fuel in the map to some extent, as higher octane fuel requires more time to ignite and produce the explosion. At the end of the day, he who runs the least boost and timing for the required power wins imo. (but where is the fun in that? :))

As a comparison Scotty, what ign advance does yours take in the top end on E85, if you don't mind sharing?

These yanks seem to like to put 18-20 degrees in, and they seem to tune on pump Gas, which just doesn't make sense to me knock wise.

Mine seems to run around 24 deg max in the top end under full load from what I can see... (there could be any number of maps overlaid over it,) That is an ethanol tune on a low compression engine obviously, I don't have to worry about knock.

It is an rpm x map pressure so as the boost rises timing gets lower to around 2.9 bar then it drops back to zero.

Lovin' the info Alex and glad to hear that the tune is safer and feels better :)

Re the Yanks, could their numbers it have anything to do with a combo of happy dynos and the seemingly widespread expectation of a full rebuild after 20-30,000 (thus pushing the engine to the limit with the timing)?

Edited by iamhe77

I would have thought happy dyno time for sure, but a Stock block car with 10psi has run a 11.7 @ 119mph, which would indicate the power is there. I just don't know how they can put the extra timing in, unless either a) we are seeing phantom knock or b) they are dosing up with toluene or race gas on the dyno or I guess c) there is a massive difference in pump fuel octane downunder.

That timing issue seems to be the only difference in between my power and theirs. AFR is the same. I don't believe I have an exhaust restriction at this stage.

The ECU is smart with timing - apparently you can make changes to the figures, and the ECU will take a few runs to compensate for the changes and find out the best path. Too smart for its own good.

Very smart but when you take the knock sensor out of the equation you are asking for trouble. Essentially you want to make smooth power so the knock sensor doesn't back the timing out.

Did you look at the HKS manifold adapter? That's what I call a restriction, but the results you have seen, are they running the same kit?

Nope, he's running GT25 twins. I'm just using it as a stock block comparison.

Manual Z using F-Con & HKS kit is 245kw at wastegate pressure. I have no idea if that's in la-di-da land or not. I should get him to put it down the 1/4 . Maybe I'll just be happy!

True that the HKS adaptor isn't going to flow like twins will.

atm its single tyre frying time. rwd and open diff is silly.

3 inch, and should be all the way.

I think Scott made good power with a Fujitsubo, which is essentially the same exhaust. We can always drop it and see.

There is a big HKS Cat in there too, which I dunno how good they are, but wouldn't have thought its shit.

hey alex, congrats on the successful re-tune. i think the HKS supercharger kit and turbo kit make pretty much the same amount of power at stock boost for the vq35. the 2006 rev-up z with supercharger and a 2004 superchargerd Z in sydney both made 240s and Bao's 2004 turboed Z made around the same. i lost 20-30kw on them due to the auto vs manual drainage. maybe the 4wd setup on the stagea casued you further loss even though you swaped to rwd?

in the end the numbers looks pretty much on the money for us slush box cars i guess. however i will never find out if my plenum spacer is actually sucking power from my car lol.

Craig, your a massive Trolololol. Come back when your car doesn't sound like a milo tin full-o-bolts. Thanks for waking me up last night to mate- Obvious drunk is obvious. :P

I think I found a restriction, but I'll wait for proof before putting it out there.

You just have stronger Rods ok... Its not all about the Rod.

We can do craigs next week if he is keen, i wouldlike to do it one weeknight, give him a nudge in this direction :D

i have been looking at the emanage software and it lookspretty basic, i think the stock ecu is going to be the issue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
    • Greg speaks wisdom. These dirty old Datsuns are only value when they are cheap. When they are not cheap, there is no value. Sounds contradictory, but it's true. We are now 20 years past the hey day of modifying cheap 90s JDM cars for small amounts of money. This is a different world. If you are rich and can afford not to care about what is effectively wasting money on an old Datto shitter, then I have no reason to argue against it. But if you are wanting to experience what we all experienced back in 2005 (and I bought my car last century!) then there is no way to do it.
    • Short answer: No. Medium answer: No, because you still need to conjure the things out of thin air to bolt them to a NA to make it a NA+T. Long Answer: No - The things you need to conjure - meaning a turbo, intercooling, manifolds, exhaust, intake/manifold/piping, clutch, injectors, fuel pump, AFM (?), ECU + Wiring (woo, N/A loom fun) have to come from somewhere. You could have many scavenged these things from an OEM car that someone had upgraded from and use some of these. This will be cost prohibitive now, especially so in the USA. You'd probably pay the same for newer, upgraded components that are better than old OEM stuff from 25-30 years ago. None of these big ticket items are re-usable for the N/A car. Why not buy new and upgrade while you're there? The only real consideration is turbo and fuel sizing and determining whether you want to stay within the bounds of the OEM engine or get into rebuild territory. These limits ARE lower with a N/A motor and especially N/A gearbox at the starting point. And if you're gonna upgrade those then you may as well consider having them built to begin with. Because everyone here knows you're never far from that next engine rebuild once you start making the power you want... The cars you see on the internet and SAU etc have been built over decades. If you're really clued in... you would sell your US car to somebody for what you paid for it. You would then scour AU JDM pages or SAU and buy a car like Dose's on this forum with your powerful American Dollar. This will save you so much money in the long term. Importing it could be tricky. Or it might not because USA. I have long said the only reason 90's Japanese stuff took off was because a) Japanese people had Japanese cars so that is what they used b) Australians could import these cars to Australia with very minimal changes and use them on the road here c) Neither country had well-priced access to US or EU Sports Cars. I don't believe the JDM scene would have taken off in Australia at all if we had EU priced EU BMW M offerings, or more especially the AUS V8 Scene would never have existed if we had the multitude of US cars like Camaros, Mustangs, Corvettes at the prices you folks do. After all - Do the math. I would say put a V8 in your R34 and that's the smart way forward. It is. I did it. I know this from my own experience. But at that point there's no reason to simply not buy a C5 or C6? It would be simpler and easier and cheaper and bette-
    • Reading all this... hurts lol. I have an ENR34 5MT and I paid an inflated USA price for the car alone, had to do tons of preventative maintenance past that, and so I'm over $30K USD into the car already and haven't even touched power.  I wanted to +t it. Not even trying to make GTR numbers, I'd be happy with 250hp.  Can I get away with paying much less to make that happen?
×
×
  • Create New...