Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My r32 gtr, does not usually run a cat when taking the car to the track, i have a decat to bolt in its place, but this is a 3" cat and a 3" system, well some of it is 3" so it may as well all be

I'm currently making up a whole new exhaust which is a twin 3" into 4" front pipe with 3" HPI dump pipes, and a full 4" exhaust without any restrictions, Hks 4" muffler etc.

I do have in my possession a Matrix metal cat which is 4" pipe size and 5" through the body.

Wanting to know if anyone has back to back tested anything like this, will it be worthwhile me building a decat to test on the dyno and running at the track, or wil the 5" cat not be a restriction?

my mods and goals are:

rb26 stock stroke

700cc inj

pfc pro + Z32 afm's

2860-5's currently at 1.5 bar

HPI dumps

twin 3" into full 4" system straight through muffler

BP ultimate 98 octane fuel

looking for high high 300's rwkws, 400 would be nice :rofl:

any help appreciated

Edited by blue_vl_t

My r32 gtr, does not usually run a cat when taking the car to the track, i have a decat to bolt in its place, but this is a 3" cat and a 3" system, well some of it is 3" so it may as well all be

I'm currently making up a whole new exhaust which is a twin 3" into 4" front pipe with 3" HPI dump pipes, and a full 4" exhaust without any restrictions, Hks 4" muffler etc.

I do have in my possession a Matrix metal cat which is 4" pipe size and 5" through the body.

Wanting to know if anyone has back to back tested anything like this, will it be worthwhile me building a decat to test on the dyno and running at the track, or wil the 5" cat not be a restriction?

my mods and goals are:

rb26 stock stroke

700cc inj

pfc pro + Z32 afm's

2860-5's currently at 1.5 bar

HPI dumps

twin 3" into full 4" system straight through muffler

BP ultimate 98 octane fuel

looking for high high 300's rwkws, 400 would be nice :rofl:

any help appreciated

why even run a cat? if they are going to get you they will for something else anyway

There is a massive difference between having no cat and any other mod as far as the law is concerned. You get a huge fine for not running a cat on the street. It is like bringing drugs to Bali. You could do it but when you get caught you get f**ked in the ass.

Edited by Room42

running no cat on the street is not the go, i realize this and will be running it, the question asked is, will the engine make more power without it? For the dyno tune and to use a decat for the track

Your turbos will be a bigger restriction than that cat if it's a 100 cell. Have made multiple 550hp at wheels using those cats

How do i know if its a 100 cell, the brand is Matrix Metal Cat, can i tell by looking inside it?

good to see real results, but i suppose what i'm saying is, the cars making 550hp at the tyres with a 5" cat fitted, would they make 2, 4, 10, 20??? rwkw more if removed and a straight pipe fitted, FOR RACE AND DYNO USE :laugh:

I'm probably not making enough power (currently 350rwhp) yet to be of any use to you, but for what it's worth I've got a 5" body 100cell Venom metal cat; the car only made 5rwhp more after dropping the whole exhaust from the front-pipe back.

How do i know if its a 100 cell, the brand is Matrix Metal Cat, can i tell by looking inside it?

good to see real results, but i suppose what i'm saying is, the cars making 550hp at the tyres with a 5" cat fitted, would they make 2, 4, 10, 20??? rwkw more if removed and a straight pipe fitted, FOR RACE AND DYNO USE :laugh:

I would guesstimate less than 10rwkw different between a quality 100 cell metal cat 5" body and a decat pipe at 550rwhp.

Why don't u just run It on the dyno with your street setup on. Than drop the exhaust infront of the cat and do a run, you will than no if there's a restriction, and if you running a 4inch exhaust the hole way, it will be pretty simple figure out that it's the cat resticting it, cause I doubt a 4inch exhaust would.

Why don't u just run It on the dyno with your street setup on. Than drop the exhaust infront of the cat and do a run, you will than no if there's a restriction, and if you running a 4inch exhaust the hole way, it will be pretty simple figure out that it's the cat resticting it, cause I doubt a 4inch exhaust would.

this is very true, will do.

when i eventually get on the dyno i will post the results for others information either way

Dont be soft. Xrated down here was running nos on his stock bottom end. Was good for a 10.6 from memory

fair enough....

so what do you run in the way of exhaust Rob?? Do you run a cat, or some special "high flow" version :whistling:

have you tried different setups or with the exhaust dropped on the dyno to see the difference?

I had a decat pipe and bolted on a FIA approved 100 cell metal substrate race cat on our R32 GTR with twin high flowed HKS2540 turbos.

Yes at top end, say 5600rpm onwards you can feel some loss of power and turbo response, the higher you revved, the more you lost.

Now heres the funny part after i spent all my money on it.......its still not street legal, it will not pass emissions testing, it does not meet the requirements, its just a race cat for classes that specify a cat must be installed.

I was better off staying with a gutted out cat with flanges and keeping the most restrictive/best scrubbing cat on the side in case i needed to go for emissions testing.

Learned the costly way.

Edited by GTRPSI

fair enough....

so what do you run in the way of exhaust Rob?? Do you run a cat, or some special "high flow" version :whistling:

have you tried different setups or with the exhaust dropped on the dyno to see the difference?

With my old 300rwkw setup and 3" exhaust I gained 6rwkw by removing the high flow cat.

When I ran the twin turbo setup on the RB25 I had a side pipe but didnt do any tests with the full system

The current system 4" dump, no cat, 3.5" system with a cannon at the rear was fine at 475rwkw.

Will be making a new 4" system shortly but not sure about a cat.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's the thing....the basics of fuel and ignition are deceptively simple.....getting it to behave like factory in all conditions after airflow mods is way more complex. Newer cars like the V37 are all about modifying the standard ECU which is about a billion times more complex than they were 20 years ago, with a bunch of parameters affecting others
    • The larger TB I had on the SS was a pain to get to idle right, but, that was cable In the end they just raised the idle up a couple of hundred RPM so it was happy idling away either in gear or in park (slush box life) I'm curious on how my NC will idle with the new intake, larger TB, and cams that are currently going in/on, but I have faith that MX5 Mania will sort this "electronical" "black magic" out the best they can in the tune with a electronic TB Sometimes I wish I knew more about the intricacies of tuning, but most of the time I don't because I know it would hurt my brain 馃ぃ
    • That's the thing. Cam is smaller than before.. though the old cam was +6 degrees advanced. We're talking huge changes here, the narrowbands want to trim out 20% of fuel and pull the (wideband) idle to like 16.0 AFR or such. One side is a little more trimmy than the other. Think along the lines of ~20% to ~15-18%. Unfortunately my scouring of the internet hasn't really found anyone with this issue. People either just disable NB's or have them wildly different, where one is -20% and the other is +20 or 0 (i.e a sensor is just dead/wiring is just busted). Turning them off and relying on the base map only results in the wideband reporting at about 14.0 with the Varex closed. It'd be a little leaner (closer to 14.7ish) with the Varex open. I know I can just change the switch points so that the narrowbands agree with the wideband, but it's still odd. Both of them are reading voltage, it's just that they're reading quite high mv, in the ~800 region. It's just odd. This was with the IAT fudged to report it was about ~22 degrees which is my guesstimation of the temperature in the room. I have an OEM sensor ready to try tonight, which is slow and crap - but .. worked last time I used it. Sadly I am aware that idle tuning with the big TB is going to be a PITA and I look 'forward' to many hours spent stalling or stumbling idle or delving into drivability things.
    • The GTR strut brace clears the new manifold.. by about 0.5mm. So this means I need to buy an OEM GTT Strut brace (again), which will clear the new manifold, but not the bonnet vents. I guess I can sell the GTR Strut brace with the bonnet with the vents as a package deal as someone will need this one day. So my choices are vented bonnet but no strut brace, or GTR Bonnet with OEM brace (which I have to buy) but is bright red instead of the same colour as the rest of the car, which means the entire front end of the car will just be red until it goes back to paint jail. In other news the engine starts and doesn't leak. Why both O2 narrowband sensors think the tune is rich AF I do not know. The idle is also pretty shitty and my expensive IAT sensor from the USA is dead. The car sounds awful. But I assume or at least hope this is due to the many exhaust leaks, and the concrete garage it is in, sitting there with 0 intake bolted to it, and no bonnet or panels or anything to stop the induction/intake sound which is about 200db.
  • Create New...