Jump to content
SAU Community

Vic Wasteland Thread

R31Nismoid

By R31Nismoid,
in Victoria

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 84.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Birds

    7929

  • joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo

    6791

  • Sunkist

    6123

  • UNR33L

    4177

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo
joeyjoejoejuniorshabadoo

probably worth more than your D1R's

Mohsen
Mohsen

i kinda want one. name him al pacacino.

Birds
Birds

You laugh now, but when I'm at a formal occasion with a shitty DJ and they need someone to drop Dre beats...I have something up my sleeve.

Posted Images

Basti Grand Master

Basti

Posted
Posted

Fiendish Dr. Wu, you done f**ked up now!

black-dynamite.jpg

must watch this. remind me

You know, it won't double post if you click submit once. Even if an error comes up or the page doesn't load after clicking it, the post will still have been submitted.

this

wrong. the whole reason it doesnt let you post until 30 seconds after your last post is so that it doesnt double post

the face that im tripple posting in under 10 seconds. means Sau done f'd up.plus im clicking submit once. and closing and opening the page again. and its still doing it.

lol. still on posting restrictions?

Count Grantleyish Grand Master

Count Grantleyish

Posted
Posted

Being shrewd is the wrong way to go as well lol.. there's always a fine balance between being overly generous and a jew.. erm, a tight azz

Yeah, where does the line is being drawn on?

This, we'll never know.

Flynnn Grand Master

Flynnn

Posted
Posted

Single huh?

Its called being wise.

I can't see the logic behind spending enourmous amount of money on your girlfriend unless its your wife, then you're sharing incomes together.

If you want to go out and joy some time together, get her to pay for the bill every now and then. If you're having to pay over 60-75% of the time, shes using you and most likely screwing some one else behind your back.

Sunkist Grand Master

Sunkist

Posted
Posted

Its called being wise.

I can't see the logic behind spending enourmous amount of money on your girlfriend unless its your wife, then you're sharing incomes together.

If you want to go out and joy some time together, get her to pay for the bill every now and then. If you're having to pay over 60-75% of the time, shes using you and most likely screwing some one else behind your back.

thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard.

chivalry never met you didnt it.. you being a tight ass explains the no gf thing lol

blah_blah Grand Master

blah_blah

Posted
Posted

I don't know man, there's a line to being nice and making sure your not taken advantage of.

If your in a r/ship and you know the person then by all means spend to your hearts content.

But if your just dating and your paying for everything and diamonds, and you know at the bottom of your heart she wouldn't be with you if you didn't. Time to grab the parachute I say.

Flynnn Grand Master

Flynnn

Posted
Posted

thats the stupidest thing ive ever heard.

chivalry never met you didnt it.. you being a tight ass explains the no gf thing lol

Not really brah.

In a modern day society where women have occupied almost half of the work force, especially the service sector, men don't really need to dish out for women anymore. If she has a stable, secure income, you shouldn't be paying for anything for her. She's more than capable enough to pay for her own shit.

Not to brag or anything but.. i have met and fondled with girls that had a boyfriend treating her like a princess.

Birds Grand Master

Birds

Posted
Posted

I don't know man, there's a line to being nice and making sure your not taken advantage of.

If your in a r/ship and you know the person then by all means spend to your hearts content.

But if your just dating and your paying for everything and diamonds, and you know at the bottom of your heart she wouldn't be with you if you didn't. Time to grab the parachute I say.

Agreed. It is very context and situationally dependant. But even if you are in a relationship, you still don't want to be buying absolutely anything and everything or you will turn her into a cash cow and she will expect gifts etc. all the time. It's all about happy mediums...surprises here and there. I don't think I'd ever let a girl pay for dinner though, even my female friends that I take out for dinner on occasion I always offer to pay and they force me not to.

In a modern day society where women have occupied almost half of the work force, especially the service sector, men don't really need to dish out for women anymore. If she has a stable, secure income, you shouldn't be paying for anything for her. She's more than capable enough to pay for her own shit.

In a modern day men can jerk off, but why when it feels better if a girl does it?

It's not about needing to, it's just a nice gesture of courtesy. Women can open doors themselves too, but I'll still do it because chivalry is a nice thing. As Tony said, there is a difference between being generous and being taken advantage of.

And I don't care how independant women want to get, how much they earn, they will still naturally be attracted to a man who can give them security both physically and financially. What's $40-50 worth of dinner for a date anyway? Think of it as an investment on the sex you may or may not get later.

GTRRKT Rising Star

GTRRKT

Posted
Posted

Agreed. It is very context and situationally dependant. But even if you are in a relationship, you still don't want to be buying absolutely anything and everything or you will turn her into a cash cow and she will expect gifts etc. all the time. It's all about happy mediums...surprises here and there. I don't think I'd ever let a girl pay for dinner though, even my female friends that I take out for dinner on occasion I always offer to pay and they force me not to.

In a modern day men can jerk off, but why when it feels better if a girl does it?

It's not about needing to, it's just a nice gesture of courtesy. Women can open doors themselves too, but I'll still do it because chivalry is a nice thing. As Tony said, there is a difference between being generous and being taken advantage of.

And I don't care how independant women want to get, how much they earn, they will still naturally be attracted to a man who can give them security both physically and financially. What's $40-50 worth of dinner for a date anyway? Think of it as an investment on the sex you may or may not get later.

haha I like your thinking

GTRRKT Rising Star

GTRRKT

Posted
Posted

Agreed. It is very context and situationally dependant. But even if you are in a relationship, you still don't want to be buying absolutely anything and everything or you will turn her into a cash cow and she will expect gifts etc. all the time. It's all about happy mediums...surprises here and there. I don't think I'd ever let a girl pay for dinner though, even my female friends that I take out for dinner on occasion I always offer to pay and they force me not to.

In a modern day men can jerk off, but why when it feels better if a girl does it?

It's not about needing to, it's just a nice gesture of courtesy. Women can open doors themselves too, but I'll still do it because chivalry is a nice thing. As Tony said, there is a difference between being generous and being taken advantage of.

And I don't care how independant women want to get, how much they earn, they will still naturally be attracted to a man who can give them security both physically and financially. What's $40-50 worth of dinner for a date anyway? Think of it as an investment on the sex you may or may not get later.

haha I like your thinking

Count Grantleyish Grand Master

Count Grantleyish

Posted
Posted

What's $40-50 worth of dinner for a date anyway? Think of it as an investment on the sex you may or may not get later.

Isn't this gambling of different kind?

But it's a good form o gambling though.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Wazmond
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By Wazmond · Posted

      Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • GTSBoy
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • Kinkstaah
      Welshys 32ZILA and the 8HP.

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
    • PranK
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By PranK · Posted

      The thing is, once the content has been tagged we can chop and change the end result as much as we want. Its identifying the content in the first place that needs to be done regardless of the final outcome.
    • PranK
      Use text replace function to auto-link to referred threads?

      By PranK · Posted

      Sorry @GTSBoy I thought I'd replied here. There's a new BIG version of invision coming out soon, it might be worth waiting until that happens as it contains a lot of improved functionality for tags. My suggestion would be to add a top level page (not thread) with some info on it and then link to sub pages for various topics. We could even just start really simple with 2 or 3 pages underneath it. Those pages could just have a view (like a pre configured search result) of the tags we choose to put on it. We could have some background or an intro on each of these pages. My only issue is that while admins and mods can update the existing content to contain the tags we want, new posts can have whatever tags the author wants. That said, the reason our tags are so messy is because of that, so maybe we restrict tagging to admins/mods in edits.
×
×
  • Create New...