Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Had a headache by the end of the first paragraph you Kent's are too smart for me

Lol Alex, I was about to say the same.. Lol the only reason I know that ethanol burns slower is because I set it in fire at Scott's lol

I like fire

But yeh the bigger arc/gap makes sense!

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

B2YH-vat_original.png

About to happen to me... very hungry so call my mate to go Subway/Schnitz.

Then Pho is brought up. Also very acceptable. Nek minnit his missus also coming (which is no problem... the problem is that she doesn't live *close* and now I have to wait longer until my food is in front of me :'( ).

tl;dr

getting pho, but have to wait :'(

Edited by kaitoukid

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

I'm still gonna say go to .8mm. I don't think you are chasing 350+kw I mean mine were .8 on all my cars. Never had an issue with making powerz

http://www.ngksparkplugs.com/techinfo/spark_plugs/faq/faqpregap.asp?nav=31200&country=US

Another consideration that should be taken into account is the extent of any modifications that you may have made to the engine. As an example, when you raise compression or add forced induction (a turbo system, nitrous or supercharger kit) you must reduce the gap (about .004" for every 50 hp you add). However, when you add a high power ignition system (such as those offered by MSD, Crane, Nology) you can open the gap from .002-.005".

Interesting...

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

It does burn cooler, but from what I'm reading, not slower. Google has some conflicting results...some say faster, others say slower...and this also seems to change depending on AFRs too. Ethanol does have a higher autoignition point, making it less prone to detonation and harder to ignite than gasoline...but from what I understand, once ignited, will burn faster. I would like to know which one is correct, is there a way to test it without blowing ourselves up?

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

Ethanol burns slower but an increase in pressure changes it's burn rate drastically. There is also more oxygen to help it burn.

I have seen nearly 1000 degrees C in my manifold, so it certainly doesn't burn cold, just colder than dino 98. This is mainly due to extra timing though, as adding timing gives the fuel more time to burn in the cylinder, not in the exhaust.

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

^^ This. :)

well, burning both fuels at atmospheric would be very different to burning both fuels under cylinder conditions, cylinders have pressure between 160 to 200ish psi? that's from 10 to 15x atmospheric pressure.

mr aero engineer, any input?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I suppose that's true. Barring almost any situation, I'll never sell so what the market does is kind of irrelevant to me. It's possible I'd make most of my money back. That spreadsheet I mentioned? Maybe I could make back more than what the car's total costs thus far are, but the parts and all that is possibly a different story... Thanks for reading. It was certainly a good moment and just makes the ties to the car that much stronger. It's exciting that the option will be there to bring it over, however I have some plans with a shop that may end up keeping the car there longer, not sure. Coupled with the fact I want to move there and haven't solidified any path yet. So in a way, it feels like I'm in a limbo state that is uncertain; time will tell.
    • No worries, everything worked out in the end. I just wanted to make the point that it doesn't matter where it comes from (I.E Australia), it can be broken or improperly built. I would still purchase from these companies in the future. B2R - Not certain how that finished, this was on a car I wired a few things and street tuned. I know the owner ended up shipping the motor back to Australia for investigation. Hopefully some of it is covered under warranty.  Turbosmart - I always pressure test everything that goes on my car. It's a habit from my career in oil and gas. I run two 40mm's and both had major leaks from the actuator to exhaust portion through the shaft. I returned both, they shipped me back two and one was leaking and the other had a 38mm top (40mm gate with 38mm actuator cap, no idea how that happens). Eventually after a lot of back and forth I found myself with two non-leaking gates. I believe this happens a lot more then people would like to believe but you would never know if you don't pressure test them prior to installation. Crank Motorsport - Issued a full refund and let me keep the seat rails. I turned them into scrap metal for other projects. GKTech - Shipped me out a replacement and asked that I modify it as per my idea and that they would do the same for a future revision. ATP - Can just needed a large shim to bolt up properly.  Haltech - They started an actual proper Beta channel for firmware's a few months back and stopped using the general public for testing. I'm now much happier.  Speedtek - f**k Speedtek. I would love to watch them burn.     
    • I've got a Turbosmart wastegate, ATP catch can, many GK Tech parts and Haltech everything. Everything's been perfect, sorry to hear your experience wasn't the same
    • The only high-power RB I've personally seen go pop after running for all of an hour on a dyno was built by B2R, while being remotely tuned by B2R. The only wastegates I've ever had leak like a sieve, return, still leak, return and get shipped back the wrong ones were from Turbosmart. The only final drive that I've ever purchased that were unusable, twice... were from Speedtek. The only seat mounts that I've ever purchased that placed the seats in the door frame were from Crank Motorsport. The only poorly designed parts that I had the manufacturer confirm should have been designed as per what I mentioned were from GKTech. The only ECU I've had firmware updates consistently break things are Haltech. The only catch can I've purchased that didn't fit in its advertised spot was from ATP. So forth and so on... Moral of the story, doesn't matter where it's from. Do your research beforehand and stick with products and companies you've trusted in the past.    @joshuaho96 If you want it done right, do it yourself.
    • Something coarse-ish. 180 is good.
×
×
  • Create New...