Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

Had a headache by the end of the first paragraph you Kent's are too smart for me

Lol Alex, I was about to say the same.. Lol the only reason I know that ethanol burns slower is because I set it in fire at Scott's lol

I like fire

But yeh the bigger arc/gap makes sense!

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

B2YH-vat_original.png

About to happen to me... very hungry so call my mate to go Subway/Schnitz.

Then Pho is brought up. Also very acceptable. Nek minnit his missus also coming (which is no problem... the problem is that she doesn't live *close* and now I have to wait longer until my food is in front of me :'( ).

tl;dr

getting pho, but have to wait :'(

Edited by kaitoukid

Awesome thanks for the /skylinesaustralia discussion in the wasteland.

Thinking of buying bcpr7es-11 to see if misfire caused by heat range of plug. If issue still occurs, I'll drop them to 8mm?

Thoughts on this? Cheers

I'm still gonna say go to .8mm. I don't think you are chasing 350+kw I mean mine were .8 on all my cars. Never had an issue with making powerz

http://www.ngksparkplugs.com/techinfo/spark_plugs/faq/faqpregap.asp?nav=31200&country=US

Another consideration that should be taken into account is the extent of any modifications that you may have made to the engine. As an example, when you raise compression or add forced induction (a turbo system, nitrous or supercharger kit) you must reduce the gap (about .004" for every 50 hp you add). However, when you add a high power ignition system (such as those offered by MSD, Crane, Nology) you can open the gap from .002-.005".

Interesting...

Nah Adam, ethanol does burn slower than petrol. It also burns cooler due to the hydrogen bonds in etOH, which requires a lot more energy to vapourise than petrol. Explains the lower EGTs when running etOH huh? Fact in point is bubble point of etOH which is only C2 is 70degrees, it is a trend that the more the carbons, the higher the bubble pt (high school chem i assume).

Petrol is basically C8, with various isomers and aromatics added in to increase octane rating, but they all have roundabout 6 to 8 carbons, and no oxygen in the molecule itself. Petrol itself boils at 90degrees, but the components are largely C8.

We can look at vapour pressure and heat of vapourisation to understand volatility. 896kJ of energy is required to vapourise 1kg of EtOH vs 298 for octane, which is the closes to petrol. This, is why it burns cooler and slower. Or at least why i understand it burns cooler and slower. I'll have to look up activation energies to further explain why etOH burns slower but i cbf now.

And that is why, it is probably better to go a hotter plug when you're using etOH as a fuel.

It does burn cooler, but from what I'm reading, not slower. Google has some conflicting results...some say faster, others say slower...and this also seems to change depending on AFRs too. Ethanol does have a higher autoignition point, making it less prone to detonation and harder to ignite than gasoline...but from what I understand, once ignited, will burn faster. I would like to know which one is correct, is there a way to test it without blowing ourselves up?

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

Ethanol burns slower but an increase in pressure changes it's burn rate drastically. There is also more oxygen to help it burn.

I have seen nearly 1000 degrees C in my manifold, so it certainly doesn't burn cold, just colder than dino 98. This is mainly due to extra timing though, as adding timing gives the fuel more time to burn in the cylinder, not in the exhaust.

One thing is for certain...ethanol is awesome.

^^ This. :)

well, burning both fuels at atmospheric would be very different to burning both fuels under cylinder conditions, cylinders have pressure between 160 to 200ish psi? that's from 10 to 15x atmospheric pressure.

mr aero engineer, any input?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hows your intake piping? Are you still running stock? Having in the stock AFM position would mean, if the BOV was shut/venting out, it'd create the almost stalling kind of effect right // "the rich pulse behaviour" due to MAF thinking air is flowing ? But this would be better than having the bov in the stock position + MAF on/just before cross over piping right?
    • Essentially, yes. Although I wouldn't put the AFM on the crossover pipe. I'd want to put it into what amounts to the correct size tube, which is more easily done in the intercooler pipework. I bought a mount tube for card stile AFM that replaces the stock AFM - although being a cheap AliExpress knockoff, it had not flange and I had to make and weld my own. But it is the same length and diameter as the stock RB AFM, goes on my airbox, etc etc. I don't have a sick enough rig to warrant anything different, and the swap will take 5 minutes (when I finally get around to it and the injectors & the dyno tune).
    • So to summarise, the best thing to do is to move recirc to between turbo and IC, and maf on the crossover pipe. Meaning I'd need a recirc flange, drill a hole in the piping on turbo outlet area. And drill hole on crossover to fit/weld maf sensor? Either that or put the MAF on the turbo inlet right?  Is an aftermarket recirc/blowoff valve recommended? Do currently have family in Japan so could probably bring something back with maybe a cheeky lil SuperAutobacs run?
    • Yep, so far most have said that it looks like corrosion on the wall from piston not moving. Which then has probably damaged the oil rings and caused those vertical marks. The longest the engine was still after the rebuild, was the winter of 2018 - 2019, plus the boat trip to Japan. When I shipped the car, it had normal gas in the tank but before that winter pause, it had E85 in tank.  In any case, even if either one of those was the cause, it happened close to 6 years ago and the car has been driven something like 30 000kms after the fact. Again, apart from the plugs and the dip stick, there is nothing in the way the car runs that would indicate what has been going on in the engine. I am going to consult a shop and ask their opinion, what would be the best approach. I do have some access to a garage I could use to diagnose further myself, but time is very restrictive. Might end up buying another engine that could be used while this one is being remedied. Without pulling the head, it will be impossible to find out if it needs another bore, but here's to hoping a hone would suffice.  Goddamnit, I would really have preferred this not happening.  
    • Boot is going to be replaced eventually. I just wire brushed what I could and rust converted. Then painted in rust kill primer. the spoiler also got repainted and plugs replaced on the ends. The under side of the bonnet is going to be black also, currently white. But red on the top side, same colour code as the silo to begin.
×
×
  • Create New...