Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

What?

Wasn't what you were saying that the bike rider would be at fault? Of course the driver would walk its a 1.5 tone car vs 650kg lol

hahahah. well the bike rider wouldnt walk again. prob...

At the end of the day, whoever is at fault, the bike rider pays the price. Exactly why I used to ride with no farks given for the rules, I was looking out for number 1, just trying to stay alive. 20k's over seemed to keep me in the clear, overtaking cars before they realised I was there, and kept me out of blind spots.

Unfortunately the police never agreed with my theory on this...

Paul you're soo confusing bro. As much as I like you, you've just made my head explode

bahaha.

as indicated was trolling cos boredom...

yes the mazda cut that kid up, but as someone whos been riding for nearly 15 years, the kid on the bike should never have been in that postion in the first place. as birds stated, defensive riding man. its dangerous enough on a bike with out trying to hide in blind spots, then complaining about it.

At the end of the day, whoever is at fault, the bike rider pays the price. Exactly why I used to ride with no farks given for the rules, I was looking out for number 1, just trying to stay alive. 20k's over seemed to keep me in the clear, overtaking cars before they realised I was there, and kept me out of blind spots.

Unfortunately the police never agreed with my theory on this...

or offensive riding. this works too!

At the end of the day, whoever is at fault, the bike rider pays the price. Exactly why I used to ride with no farks given for the rules, I was looking out for number 1, just trying to stay alive. 20k's over seemed to keep me in the clear, overtaking cars before they realised I was there, and kept me out of blind spots.

Unfortunately the police never agreed with my theory on this...

this is what I do, I find myself just cruising at 100 in 80 zones lol

whats this pushbike thing you had? any pics?

wheelied changing 4th over a hill the other night, would of looked cool but half pooped myself, dat light naked bike lyf

Edited by UNR33L

At the end of the day, whoever is at fault, the bike rider pays the price. Exactly why I used to ride with no farks given for the rules, I was looking out for number 1, just trying to stay alive. 20k's over seemed to keep me in the clear, overtaking cars before they realised I was there, and kept me out of blind spots.

Unfortunately the police never agreed with my theory on this...

This. Being in the right isn't a good consolation prize when you're dead.

I speed off from every light (after looking both ways for red light runners) to keep ahead of traffic; I pass cars at 40-50 over the speed limit, just so I'm sitting next to them for as little time as possible.

The law will get you killed on a motor bike, if you ride how they want you to. They would defect my loud as shit exhaust that makes every car aware of my presence. Every alive rider who has been riding for years knows to disregard laws, acquire legs.

Yes Mazda driver was a f**khead. Had he indicated for even a few seconds before moving over, the bike would have known to slow down, else face a potential merging car. Unfortunately most people on the road don't know the meaning of the word indicator. And unfortunately a lot of riders don't remember that cars do this shit, so they sit next to them waiting for it to happen.

yep I NEVER sit next to a car

also lane splitting to the front of lights is good so you can get away, sitting in traffic with the cars makes you more at risk

Edited by UNR33L

As for sitting in the right of the left lane...the idea behind this is so cars that do see you, don't try to lane share cause they think there's enough space. I'm a bit of a left lane person myself, only cause I'd rather take my chances with front lawns and poles than oncoming traffic or the lanes next to me / shit that can run over me.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...