Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Someone find me a torrent for the MC hammer movie

Too Legit: The MC Hammer story, I believe it's called

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0283457/

Looks horrible, not even worth a synopsis or cover art apparently.

Anyone give me a reason why I shouldn't buy these:

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/DeatschWerks-01J-00-0550-6-550cc-min-Fuel-Injectors-Set-of-6-/331074662353?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item4d15966fd1&_uhb=1

The're within the budget, should support ~280rwkw goal and Trent recommended them as being pretty good quality.

Because you can get near new R35 injectors and an rb26 fuel rail for less still.

Surely flow-matched and new is better than possibly mismatched and used? Or are the Nismo items that much better?

Much of a muchness for performance; they are probably all made in the same factory anyway, but Nismos have been proven time and time again and they hold their value well in case you part out down the track.

yaaaay housemates are gone. left plenty of stupidity behind though. filled the rubbish bin with balloons they didn't even deflate, and asking me if I'd seen an engagement ring they lost last week.

yaaaay housemates are gone. left plenty of stupidity behind though. filled the rubbish bin with balloons they didn't even deflate, and asking me if I'd seen an engagement ring they lost last week.

Find ring

Pawn it

Spend it on Meisters for the Pulsar

???

Profit

they just cleaned the house to get their bond back, they'd have a better chance of finding it than me. probably only went looking for it because immigration department needs proof of engagement.

lol. they stopped wrapping burgers to prevent the mangle ness and also ditched those cardboard bands so you can't tell when they've reduced the size of the burger (which they've done a few times in the last few years)

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...