Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

P.S. old mate came to Australia as an immigrant at 17 living at his brothers house and pissing money away on booze until his brother told him to get his shit together and get a job

Nek half century - slightly more successful than brother

For a guy worth 100mil plus he is ridiculously down to earth

Drives S350, modest 4 bedroom house, small holiday apartment in Lorne

General manager sold his 10% share too

Which sounds like fk all

But is $20mil+

I rushed to buy shares in parent company but they halted trading on the ASX before they told us lol

They doing a share offer to raise capital for the acquisition anyway, at a 5% discount to the last traded price...these things usually stop the insider trading.

I have to hand it to the LNP. Since the spill motion (well about a month after) they have been playing the game a LOT better. This could even get them over the line.... Wouldn't be surprised if it's under Bishop though... she played the bali 2 thing very, very well and won a lot of left wing voters over.

I have to hand it to the LNP. Since the spill motion (well about a month after) they have been playing the game a LOT better. This could even get them over the line.... Wouldn't be surprised if it's under Bishop though... she played the bali 2 thing very, very well and won a lot of left wing voters over.

Like you?

  • Like 1

anyone know the australian definition of unemployed? over the age of 18 and not working? any adult collecting welfare? any adult not studying and collecting welfare?

6.5% sounds surprisingly low from what I seem to come across... though people with degrees looking for full-time work in their field, whilst working in unskilled areas is probably a lot higher than that.

Not all unemployed people are on benefits... "between jobs with decent savings or a working partner" etc...

I'd think it'd be a measurable figure like welfare plus a percentage to cover "others"... (Variable depending on what report the figure is going to be inserted into and if they want to make it look better/worse than it is)

I have to hand it to the LNP. Since the spill motion (well about a month after) they have been playing the game a LOT better. This could even get them over the line.... Wouldn't be surprised if it's under Bishop though... she played the bali 2 thing very, very well and won a lot of left wing voters over.

+1, its like they realised their public image was becoming toxic and the ALP didn't actually need to do anything to make it look worse. Certainly seems like they've hired some new PR staff who are getting sh!t back on track...

I'm still sick of these bs claims of "We are going to offer $xxxM for Public Positive Funding #1, but only if the opposition doesn't block Public Negative Funding #2 that will fund it... so if it's blocked, it's the oppositions fault that we're not supplying the funding we promised"

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



×
×
  • Create New...