Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

so significantly more come in via plane and did prior to the whole Boat people thing.

yet significantly more of the one that arrive via boats are found to be genuine cases of asylum seekers.

oh and the boats have not stopped...there is just a new policy of refusing the media any information on it so you don't know the boats have arrived...

this

All these reduce significantly when they get the hint that Australia isn't the place to sail to

this isn't going to happen.

Actually they have been shown to conduct themselves horribly to get rescued.

Aside from that why is it hamish they have no other way to get here? It's undisputed they spend thousands, tens of thousands to get here via this risky way so you tell me why don't they just get on a plane and come here like everyone else who is legitimately able to? Because they shouldn't be here that's why.

Why destroy documentation? We don't want disease and welfare drains on our society. There's a right and a wrong way to do things, boat people are wrong.

It costs more to come by plane, not only that but planes are where the majority of your "economic refugees" come from. There are also far more people arriving by plane than people in boats, they just don't look as salacious when splattered across a PR campaign so the gov't doens't bang on about it.

"tens of thousands" is a maximum figure and is not representative of what all people pay. The people that arrived on the only boat to hit Australian shores last year (yes, it happened) paid ~$1000 a head

It also affords greater security as a nation to be discriminant about who enters our country, which is a key issue for me.

Are you saying we will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come?

  • Like 1

Are you saying we will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come?

Pretty sure that doesn't work lol

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Australia_policy

this isn't going to happen.

Whether it happens or not is a better scenario than the message that the alternative will deliver when you open the floodgates - give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses etc,

Are you saying we will decide who comes to this country and the circumstances in which they come?

A basic right of national security, you would think. But Hamish wants to give these people the power to vote for the greens.

  • Like 2

It costs more to come by plane, not only that but planes are where the majority of your "economic refugees" come from. There are also far more people arriving by plane than people in boats, they just don't look as salacious when splattered across a PR campaign so the gov't doens't bang on about it.

"tens of thousands" is a maximum figure and is not representative of what all people pay. The people that arrived on the only boat to hit Australian shores last year (yes, it happened) paid ~$1000 a head

Even $1000 for an unsuccessful attempt is a lot of money and still does not explain why they don't go through legitimate channels

You've also ignored the point of why they destroy all documentation??

Even $1000 for an unsuccessful attempt is a lot of money and still does not explain why they don't go through legitimate channels

You've also ignored the point of why they destroy all documentation??

Some of them do that... some.

Most of them cant afford legitimate channels or are unable due to the persecution they are fleeing... that's why they are called assylum seekers

A basic right of national security, you would think. But Hamish wants to give these people the power to vote for the greens.

Even if every asylum seeker that came via boat was allowed to vote and they all voted green, it still wouldn't touch the side of the ALP/LNP vote

did lol recently when someone told me how much it cost to obtain acid, extacy, mushrooms, etc. immediately though WTF why bother drinking?

Because it's legal and small quantities won't cause you to crash your car into a house because you thought it was a gateway into another dimension

Drugs have always been cheaper for thrills per hour vs cost

Weed was a $20 affair when I was in high school, that would last you all night while mates pissed away $50 on premixers

Even if every asylum seeker that came via boat was allowed to vote and they all voted green, it still wouldn't touch the side of the ALP/LNP vote

One less green voter in Australia is one less fk wit idealist that I have to encounter

Because it's legal and small quantities won't cause you to crash your car into a house because you thought it was a gateway into another dimension

now where's the fun in that

One less green voter in Australia is one less fk wit idealist that I have to encounter

yeah... those gad damn idealists...

Whether it happens or not is a better scenario than the message that the alternative will deliver when you open the floodgates - give me your poor, your tired, your huddled masses etc,

I find that hard to believe. Turning a boat away is a one off cost.

All these reduce significantly when they get the hint that Australia isn't the place to sail to

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, yeah, look - here's the thing. You always replace the tensioner when you're going in there to replace a belt....under normal circumstances. You want to make sure it is good and safe, and that you don't create a reason to take the front of the bloody motor apart again. But in this case, OP is replacing a belt that has aged out on time, not usage. The belt is a million miles away from aging out on usage. The belt gets a time "limit" merely because it is made of rubber and can degrade naturally. The tensioner? Not so much. I reckon it could last forever on the current usage pattern. So I reckon if the thing is going to continue to get used at the same rate, replacing the tensioner is somewhat gratuitous. Would I replace it if I was doing it on my car right now? Hell yes. Because my car does 10-20 thousand kays a year. So it's all going to be the same thrashedness. Would I YOLO it on OP's car. More than likely.
    • I dunno. I think any one of those from each side to sump is probably enough. Remember - this is about creating a path for gas flow up from the sump to the cam covers. That gas flow then has to leave via the lines to the catch can. There's probably little point in providing 100% more capacity from sump up to covers cf. what you have from there to the catch can. Put in the 3 convenient ones? Any which way that you see fit. That'd be my thoughts.
    • Getting holes drilled into to cam covers and AN10 fitting welded on. My sump has 2x AN10 fittings on it already. These are the options I have come up with that can be done without needing to remove the sump to add more fittings. In all options front of passenger side cover connects to VCT head drain bung (i know this isn't the best spot but my feeling is it must do something). Option 1 (pink). The back of each cam covers gets its own line to sump. Option 2 (blue). The back of each cam covers are linked and share a line to sump. The front of drivers side gets its own line. Option 3 (Black). Drivers side are Tee'd together and share a line to the sump. Passenger side rear gets its one line to the sump.
    • I'd be surprised if Nissan doesn't mention it in the manual as it seems unlikely that a tensioner is going to last 200,000km.
    • Tapin,    So got mine up and realize a few things. First was my slave line doesn’t reach the other side, so I have to get a longer hose made. I want to ask did you have to extend your wires for the CD009 sensors? One on the driver side(right side of car looking at the car from the rear) and one on the passenger side( the left side of car from rear). And do you know what those two sensors are respectively? I know it’s not Speedo since we talked on this already. And I may have to separate the trans again to swap out throw out bearing. We will see. Did you run your RB slave cylinder? I know you cracked your original but replaced it with a nismo. But wasn’t sure if you bought the one designed for the CD009 or not. Thanks 
×
×
  • Create New...