Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Looks like a fellow member of darker complexion might have been offended of my love for whiter girls :whistling:

im not offended. just how much whiter would you go than the above pic of Kim?

seriously would be some vampire banger if it was whiter than her.

I've never been a big fan of black girls, at least not the ones with stereotypically black features but Kim is nowhere near too dark for me. Yum.

win

Fat ass is just fat ass

full.jpg

kim_kardashian_bikini_booty_2.jpg

If that's as bad as she gets, and these paparazzi style shots at the beach usually show celebrities looking pretty terrible without their makeup and lighting, I'd be very content with that. I prefer small asses too, but as Alex said, that isn't fat...just large hips and a proportionately large ass to suit. Looks toned enough and the rest of her more than makes up for any fault with the ass :)

Ain't too many guys who would be laughing at you with that hanging off your arm!

Cameras give a false perspective of a persons height but now knowing Kim is at least 9" shorter than me, makes things clearer.

When i look at a women, i always look at how i could mount her. If Kim was at my height and with an ass almost double that of mine then that's definitely a no go zone.

I got a mate who just said no to her based on her ass, but he has yellow fever (read: yellow AIDS, he ain't ever coming back), so his idea of a fat ass is anything you can't hold in one hand.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Just a thought, but instead of restricting, is it possible to do like an "up for review" kind of thing? Where say someone who's not an admin/mod tags, it would require approval for it to actually tag? User posts with a 'tag' > Admin/Mod Reviews > Approves tag > Tag now exists kinda thing? Just came across this thread so Im not too sure if Im straying off topic or not but forgive me if i am...
    • Yes, a plan for non-action is always my first sort of plan! I'm happy to see what falls out of invision's update. I had been having some thoughts on what to do with this the other day and they all seem to have fled my memory, after various solar panel induced traumas, squeaking suspension sphericals, etc etc, over the last little bit. I'll try and recall what I had in mind and make sure that I put it into print in some form before the Alzheimer's strikes again.
    • The ability to have both a 5500 stall for launching, and a regular lockup for every other scenario is pretty sweet. Does it actually work well like that though in the real world? Would it hold up to track use and otherwise you'd never know you had a stall converter in it? If so, that's awesome
    • The thing is, once the content has been tagged we can chop and change the end result as much as we want. Its identifying the content in the first place that needs to be done regardless of the final outcome.
    • Sorry @GTSBoy I thought I'd replied here. There's a new BIG version of invision coming out soon, it might be worth waiting until that happens as it contains a lot of improved functionality for tags. My suggestion would be to add a top level page (not thread) with some info on it and then link to sub pages for various topics. We could even just start really simple with 2 or 3 pages underneath it. Those pages could just have a view (like a pre configured search result) of the tags we choose to put on it. We could have some background or an intro on each of these pages. My only issue is that while admins and mods can update the existing content to contain the tags we want, new posts can have whatever tags the author wants. That said, the reason our tags are so messy is because of that, so maybe we restrict tagging to admins/mods in edits.
×
×
  • Create New...