Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Morning blokes!

So cleaning up my nanas old house on the weekend and now there are 150 or so mini bottles of booze sitting on my loungeroom floor, some of them are quite old... eg mini Jim Beam bottles measured in 1/10 pint, a crownie measued in fl oz, etc.

Does anyone know if there is a market for old bottles of booze? Do people collect them? Are there places out there who would value and buy the lot from me?

I'm getting a normal deal I would say (for1), did my research before agreeing on a rent price

Yeah I'm thinking might need to implement a rule, cos mine comes over a little bit too but not as often (even though it's my joint) fair is fair, I'll just talk to him and say look shes living here 70% + of the time may as well make it official and start contributing or just live with her instead

It kind of turns into a mad house, it's a 2 bedroom unit often with 4 kents running around, straight to bootin everyone out and living lonesome

He should be at least paying (or her) an extra 50% if it's your place.

If your both renting it and splitting rent is be saying.

We pay (for easy maths) $210 a week each, that's $30 a day. She needs to start paying for 3 days a week as a third share ie: $20 a day.

This obviously saves you and him $30 a week also.

But by only charging for 3 days your saying it's ok for her to stay (like your gf) but more than 2/3 days a week constantly the person needs to contribute.

Hope that makes sense. My mate did this once and caused minimal backlash whilst fixing the issue still.

boys,
got some 1000cc injectors, just bought a 460lph pump and probably going to grab the z32s off my cousins freshly cooked GTR.
is it worthwhile chucking some cam gears in?
im hoping that this is the big boy tune..

He should be at least paying (or her) an extra 50% if it's your place.

If your both renting it and splitting rent is be saying.

We pay (for easy maths) $210 a week each, that's $30 a day. She needs to start paying for 3 days a week as a third share ie: $20 a day.

This obviously saves you and him $30 a week also.

But by only charging for 3 days your saying it's ok for her to stay (like your gf) but more than 2/3 days a week constantly the person needs to contribute.

Hope that makes sense. My mate did this once and caused minimal backlash whilst fixing the issue still.

The issue is I'm not paying any rent because it's my place, makes it a little more confusing, obviously I'm not charging my GF anything (she still stays sometimes) but charging my mate 175 a week / half bills, when essentially that 175 is giving them both a place to live/cook/shower/her toothbrush in the cup etc.. i feel like i'm getting ripped hard.

My mrs even tries to shower at home because she feels bad, I should just ask for 200 or something.

Edited by UNR33L

Would hardly piss her off, I know shes on good coin why not pay at least SOMETHING to contribute where you are living.. (roommates gf i mean, not mine)?

If it pisses her off then don't come back here

Edited by UNR33L
  • Like 1

The issue is I'm not paying any rent because it's my place, makes it a little more confusing, obviously I'm not charging my GF anything (she still stays sometimes) but charging my mate 175 a week / half bills, when essentially that 175 is giving them both a place to live/cook/shower/her toothbrush in the cup etc.. i feel like i'm getting ripped hard.

My mrs even tries to shower at home because she feels bad, I should just ask for 200 or something.

That makes it easier then.

I'd be saying right it's fair she stays over but it's happening all too often and I think she needs to contribute to bills ect if it continues to make it fair. And tell him you think $50 a week is fair considering she is staying 4/5 nights a week.

My ex had a rule in her house that she had house mates in and that was partners are allowed Friday and Saturday nights and Sunday obviously. Then only one other night per week so Sun, Mon, Tue, Wed, thur . Any more than one of those and you had to contribute $10.

Which I thought was fair and a good rule.

brb let me round up EVERYONE that uses Z32s

be back in 4 weeks.

Hassle is the Z32 body is physically larger and won't bolt to the stock airbox, you will also need custom piping in an area there isn't much room.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Pretty much what you'd expect at that power level. Hypergear turbo, long list of supporting mods, full Haltech catalogue, etc.  I'd say this goes for most drivers, suspension is still a dark art for most people. And it's really hard to convince someone how much better their setup could be...  
    • They are what I will be installing. 640s for me.
    • Hmm... From my experience you get about 0.25° camber change per mm of RUCA length change. So, to correct from -2.5 up to less than -1° (or, more than -1° if you look at the world as a mathematician does) then you'd be making 6-8mm of length change on the RUCA. From a stock length of 308mm, that's 2-2.5% difference in RUCA length. My RUCAs are currently very close to stock length - certainly only 2-3mm different from stock. I had to adjust my tension arms by 6mm to minimise the bump steer. That's 6mm out of 210, which is 2.8%. That's a 2.8% change on those, compared to a <1% change on the RUCAs. So the stock geometry already has worse bump steer than is possible - you can improve it even if you don't change the RUCA length. If you lengthen the RUCAs at all, then you will definitely be adding bump steer. Again, with my car, I recently had an unpleasant amount of bump steer, stemming from a number of things that happened one after another without me having an opportunity to correct for them. I only had to change the tension arm lengths by 1mm to minimise the resulting bump steer. (Granted, I also had to dial out a lot of extra toe-in in the rear, and excessive rear toe-in will make bump steer behaviour worse). Relatively tiny little adjustments having been made - the car is now completely different. Was horrifying how much it wanted to steer from the rear on any significant single wheel bump/dip. And it was even bad on expansion joints on long sweepers on freeway entry/exits, which are notionally hitting both rear wheels at the same time. My point is, the crappy Nissan multilink is quite sensitive to these things (unlike the very nice Toyota suspension!). And I think 99.75% of Skyline owners are blissfully ignorant of what they are driving around on. Sadly, it is a non-trivial exercise to set up to measure and correct bump steer. I am happy to show my rig, which involves nasty chunks of wood bolted to the hub, mirrors, lasers, graph paper targets and other horrors. Just in case anyone wants to see how it is done. I'll just have to set it up to take the photos.
    • What do you have in that bad boy ? Ill go with the 725cc since I'll be going with Nistune ( would definitely like more engine protection but Haltech is too far out of reach at the moment... plus, Ill probably have a pretty safe tune as its a daily, not gonna be chasing peak power 24/7 ahahah ). Are Xspurt a safe choice?  Pete's great. He didnt mention anything about traction arm length so I reckon it may be good. When I get some new wheels/tire later down the road I'll ask him about it and get his opinion on em. I heard from Gary that you've got the bilsteins too, are you running the sway bars too? and what other suspension goodies do you have installed or would recommend?
    • In true Gregging style...  
×
×
  • Create New...