Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If there's no claim on fuel, with rego/tires/maintenance of ~$1500, I'd be better off claiming the $3700 no?

sum up all fuel for financial year

sum up all rego / insurance / maintenence fo the year

Total all * 0.92 = your claim

if you have no log book, you will multiply everything by 0.74 instead and only have a maximum claim of $3700. (even if all your expenses * 0.74 is greater than $3700, you can only get back $3700)

fuel: $50 * 52weeks = $2600

Insur: $500

Rego/tyres/maint: $1500

Total: $4600

With Logbook:

4600 x 0.92 = $4232 back

Without logbook

4600 x 0.74 = $3404 ; maximum claim is $3700, so 3404 less than 3700, so you get all of $3404 back.

PM Sent

Also Pat is on the money. Come apply for a Grad Accountant position brah

haha pays to have accountants in the family /seewhatididther

Unfortunately, my accounting knowledge stops with the above and a bit of negative gearing knowledge. Wont be much help as a grad accountant haha

Ive probably said too much now, will be getting hassled by all the wastelanders now haha

Lets say

Rego/tyres/maint: $1500

with logbook

1500 x 0.92 = $1380 back

without logbook

1500 x 0.74 = $1110 back

Logbook got you an extra $270

Yeah but surely if you're under $3700 you'd just claim the max which is $3700? So the above examples are irrelevant, unless I'm not understanding it which is highly likely.

fuel: $50 * 52weeks = $2600

Insur: $500

Rego/tyres/maint: $1500

Total: $4600

With Logbook:

4600 x 0.92 = $4232 back

Without logbook

4600 x 0.74 = $3404 ; maximum claim is $3700, so 3404 less than 3700, so you get all of $3404 back.

Is there a cap on fuel/week cost? Coz 600+ kms a week for work, $50 will not cover lol

Yeah but surely if you're under $3700 you'd just claim the max which is $3700? So the above examples are irrelevant, unless I'm not understanding it which is highly likely.

unfortunately that means you can claim to a maximum of $3700, doesnt mean you will get $3700 always.

For example; you had $6000 worth of expenses and didnt have a log book.

$6000 x 0.74 = $4,440 claim HOWEVER $3700 is the max, so they will give you $3700 instead of $4440.

If you had logbook @ 92%

$6000 x 0.92 = $5520 claim, which you get back all as there is no cap with logbook.

Is there a cap on fuel/week cost? Coz 600+ kms a week for work, $50 will not cover lol

as long as the fuel consumption for 600+km is reasonable, dont believe there is any cap.

Have you emailed the stuff? Just checked and nothing received. Probably gone to my junk mail.

Ill get working on it first thing tomorrow morning brah

Nah haven't sent it yet, was waiting til I got the rest of my tool receipts. Got em now so I'll send it off shortly.

unfortunately that means you can claim to a maximum of $3700, doesnt mean you will get $3700 always.

For example; you had $6000 worth of expenses and didnt have a log book.

$6000 x 0.74 = $4,440 claim HOWEVER $3700 is the max, so they will give you $3700 instead of $4440.

If you had logbook @ 92%

$6000 x 0.92 = $5520 claim, which you get back all as there is no cap with logbook.

as long as the fuel consumption for 600+km is reasonable, dont believe there is any cap.

Yeah got that, just though it meant for me personally that the log book was un neccessary as my maintenance & rego is well under $3700, but with fuel it should be well over $3700, so should be ok..

600kms a week for work, that's about a tank a week just for work, so $70/$80 a week in fuel...

If I was a guy I wouldn't be impressed with a chick who likes pics taken of her kissing another girl that then get posted up in places like these. If a chick is bicurious that's cool, but out in public is clearly for attention, there are plenty of opportunities to do that in private.

Well each to theirs...but if you were a guy you could get with them and never even know they've had that photo taken and posted here. This is what I was getting at, you can't know everything someone has done...everyone has their secrets, and people change/mature, so why judge on a single photo of something you don't like? One of those girls in the pic is still a virgin...so I find it a bit hard to accept the virgin-slut oxymoron. As for attention, plenty of heterosexuals hook up in public too...is that for attention? Even if it's for attention, who cares? Everyone is an attention whore...look at every single FB status update ever made. Every revealing dress or loud joke/call. People just have different ways of getting it.

Had a shit load of the posts quoted but cbf. Agree with everyone disagreeing with Birds on this one. They're attention seeking whores, full stop. If that's what they do for fun, they're whores. Period.

Times that logic by infinity if that's what she wants in her wedding photos.

As above...everyone is an attention seeking whore IMO. But a girl kissing another girl doesn't = any less of a wife for me. I know plenty who would never kiss a girl and yet have cheated on their boyfriends, meanwhile those girls in the pic have never cheated on theirs. But each to theirs, if it's a turn off for you, it's a turn off, that's fine. It just wouldn't bother me, as I can't see the run on effects for it - to me there's more to be concerned about in a girl than if she has ever kissed a girl for a photo or not.

And thanks birds for the opinion on my missus

Welcome, stick with her :)

none of the girls i've been with have had previous sexual relations hence my interest in them in the first place. and yes i am 110% sure of it so stfu

yes they do exist but don't ever expect to end up with one when your idea of a good/clean girl is one who makes out with other chicks for "fun" and takes photos of it for the record.

standards brah, raise em.

end of the day, act like a slapper and you'll get treated like one. don't care what your past is like or how much of a goodie you are you'll never get my attention by acting broad minded personty.

but hey, that's just me

newman2.jpg

I've been in relationships with virgins before, I've been with girls who have had sex before. I'll take the latter over the former each and every time and I'd have missed out on some awesome relationships if i'd knocked back the girls who had lost their virginity. It's not about standards because virginity doesn't play a part in standards for me...it obviously does for you which is fine...just makes it harder to find "Mrs. Right".

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • @joshuaho96 Hmm considering the drama you've seen/experienced, have you looked into getting a built complete long motor shipped from Australia?  Considering the AUD is basically monopoly money when compared to the USD, at a glance this seems like a good option?
    • Bloody Skylines, they put you through the bloody wringer! Stick at it! Stunning drag strip BTW! Where is it? Can see part of the name on the slip and probably should just Google it!
    • I mean the other day I had to walk someone through diagnosing why their timing belt was walking off the cam gears. At least one of the issues was a bent tensioner stud. Local mechanics have found runout on the CAS mechanism causing weird failures. I'm also no saint here I've documented some of the things I've had to learn the hard way. Something I discovered recently is that my CA emissions catalytic converters weren't even welded correctly to align the downpipe to the main cat and they tossed the support bracket that goes from the transfer case to the downpipe to support everything there. I spend a lot of time chasing down these decidedly unsexy problems and the net effect is it feels like I never actually get to the original objective (flex fuel, VCAM, oil control, cooling, etc).
    • At times with how you make everything sound, all I imagine Americans doing when they see a gtr is standing there looking at it and bashing it with a gun like how a caveman would with a club and hoping it fixes itself 
    • I think this is just a product of how the US market works for this stuff. Shops are expensive and there's no real way of knowing what kind of results you're going to get, people don't really have the institutional knowledge. I have heard too much at this point to really put faith in anybody "full service" except maybe DSport and they aren't really a full service kind of shop. If you go to the right place I have no doubt they'll get it right for you. Some locals have set it up right but the cost really is nuts and even now they're still fighting issues. And you know I'm a crazy person who thinks things like twin scroll, relatively short low-mount cast headers, PCV recirc to intake, recirculating BOV, right-sized for ~400 whp, MAF load, validating all of that to a standard comparable to OEM test programs, etc are relevant. For what it's worth, multiple local owners at this point have been stuck in a perpetual cycle of blowing a motor -> getting someone to rebuild it -> some missed detail causes the bearings to wipe and spin just outside of break-in mileage or drop valves or some other catastrophe -> cycle repeats. I usually only find out about this because I'm perpetually helping random friends with diagnosing car troubles, Skyline or otherwise. The single turbo stuff if I'm honest is mostly secondary, it just doesn't seem to achieve the numbers in the ~2000-3000 rpm region that I would expect given the results I've seen here or in Motive's videos. I don't really know what we're missing here in the US to be causing this. Lots of people like to emphasize the necessity of finishing the project first and foremost, but I'm not made of money and I can't afford to be trashing a 15k+ USD engine build with any regularity. Or spending my relatively limited garage time these days unable to triangulate problems because too much was changed all at once. Also, even if it isn't a catastrophic failure I would consider spending the cost of single turbo conversion with nothing to show for it to be pretty bad. 
×
×
  • Create New...