Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Who teh f**k earns 1300 a week?

I want that job

Sounds more like a 2 income home to me

sister in law is a building estimator and she earns (gross) over $1700 a week. she's been on above the 'average' wage for a few years now. plus all the people in the mines earn well above $1300 a week. they'd probably clear that much. actually come to think of it, i got offered a job a while back where i would've earnt more than $1300 a week, but that was only because it was working 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.

  • Replies 174
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The average wage, which current sits at about $69,000, is gross, not nett, which is just over $1k a week after tax but before any levies or anything, ie, Medicare Levy. So consider it a round $1k/week after tax.

yeah thats what im on as a semi skilled public servant for the railways, closed workshop etc but its very average rates compared to proper tradies etc.

We are screwed if it ever goes private like Sir bazza is intending..

as for minimum wages being higher in the states resulting in cheaper cars..how the F does that make sense? i know they have economies of scale etc but we are still getting majorly ripped off here. Mostly because people will simply pay up. The internet is slowly eroding that and the government even pulled in Apple and a few others last week to parliament to explain why we are charged so much more fo Ipads etc.

still a long way to go though..

:domokun:

i dont know where they get these figures on "average" wages, but they seem quite skewed to me!!!

Yes, I take the word "average" with a grain of salt, because whenever the 'bell curve' is skewed as you say Adam, there becomes a bigger difference between "average" (ie "mean") and "median".

yeah thats what im on as a semi skilled public servant for the railways, closed workshop etc but its very average rates compared to proper tradies etc.

We are screwed if it ever goes private like Sir bazza is intending..

as for minimum wages being higher in the states resulting in cheaper cars..how the F does that make sense? i know they have economies of scale etc but we are still getting majorly ripped off here. Mostly because people will simply pay up. The internet is slowly eroding that and the government even pulled in Apple and a few others last week to parliament to explain why we are charged so much more fo Ipads etc.

still a long way to go though..

:domokun:

you read it wrong. minimum wages in the states are about half of what they are here. that's why prices are cheaper. running costs are less, plus the income tax over there is less too, so businesses get more profit from sales (on the downside, they have a f**ked healthcare system and general economy).

put simply, if you want to aussie shops to sell shit for less, get the government to drop the minimum wage and tell everyone to take a pay cut

Yes I think a large proportion of the country would be very happy to be at 69'000 as an "average" lol

...person A makes 100k per annum..

...person B makes 30K per annum..

...average wage is 65k per annum..

...person A feels like a boss..

...person B ends up on anti depressants..(that he hopes he can bulk bill)

Edited by adamskill

91 octane, $2.19/L here in NZ. i dont even look at 98octane, :( Huge government tax on fuel also, they take a good %70 of that.

Wages are crap here in NZ, im a qualified joiner and on only 37k before tax. No matter what is said on the news about NZ. our economy is f**ked

my boss went over to NZ a few weeks back. went into a bike shop. there was a bike in there that we sell at work for $419, it was about $600 over there. goes to show just how much having a small population (small buying power) can have an effect on things. in a lot of cases NZ companies join up with australian companies to try and get a better price, but they have to pay extra freight charges on the small amounts that they do buy.

oh and the government doesn't take 70% of the price of fuel in NZ. it has a fuel excise which is just under 60c, and then whatever GST is. so on the $2.19 you paid the other day, the government took just under 80c.

91 octane, $2.19/L here in NZ. i dont even look at 98octane, :( Huge government tax on fuel also, they take a good %70 of that.

Wages are crap here in NZ, im a qualified joiner and on only 37k before tax. No matter what is said on the news about NZ. our economy is f**ked

Correct me if im wrong, but you guys pay WAY less for jap imports, yeah?

i dont know where they get these figures on "average" wages, but they seem quite skewed to me!!!

When you have a sample size in excess of 10,000,000 the numbers are fairly solid.

That said the median income is around $60,000 which does change things a bit. But still, the more things change the more they stay the same. Heck, cars are generally more efficient these days than they were and the buy in is much smaller. You can buy a brand new, quality, efficient car these days for $15k. 15 years ago a small, reliable, efficient car was....$15k.

When you have a sample size in excess of 10,000,000 the numbers are fairly solid.

That said the median income is around $60,000 which does change things a bit. But still, the more things change the more they stay the same. Heck, cars are generally more efficient these days than they were and the buy in is much smaller. You can buy a brand new, quality, efficient car these days for $15k. 15 years ago a small, reliable, efficient car was....$15k.

the Australian bureau of stats quotes that the average weekly wage is around the $1300 mark.

now let me say that i dont hang around with 'dead shits' or anything of the sort.. most of my friends/ family are blue collar trades men. i have a few mates who have uni degree's and doctorates, and from what i know, out this sample demographic of friends and family, our 'average' weekly wage is not at the $1300 mark.

there must be a huge amount of people out there making massive money to pull the 'average' up to $1300 per week.

tl;dr?

i want THEIR job..

91 octane, $2.19/L here in NZ. i dont even look at 98octane, :( Huge government tax on fuel also, they take a good %70 of that.

Wages are crap here in NZ, im a qualified joiner and on only 37k before tax. No matter what is said on the news about NZ. our economy is f**ked

If those prices applied here, many people would have to downsize pronto.

We're so fortunate that we don't - and won't for a while...

Empire Gas (EGO) is about to open up its pipeline to extract gas form the Perth Basin (Red Gully) > the coast.

And EGO is still just 2c a share (but there are billions of shares).

A guy who holds drilling contracts with BHP and buys/sells EVOs through various importers told me to research the company before buying them.

I've been researching yes. Then my stockbroker at Bell Potter in Cairns says they're "promising" after positive drill sites in Red Gully (part of Perth Basin).

Just Google "Empire Gas Red Gully" and join the dots I suppose...

Cons are

a) native title land > elders require watertight assurances

b) shares are in the billions because venture capital had to be procured

Pros are

a) gas find is onshore rather than offshore

b) volume is comparable to Cooper

New thread for stock tips? Now if only I had a lazy 5 or 10k to invest in stocks..

Yeah Marc I see how I Got that back to front with my rant about minimum wages, more of a typo than a misread but the following story about new Zealand opened my eyes up about economies of scale.

Had no idea the difference in pop would have such a huge effect on prices even though all the goods are coming from the same factories..

I still believe in a minimum wage being decent and enough to live ok on though that might have something to do with so many of my jobs up till now being dependent on that.

Last thing we want is a tax system like the states, the rich are definitely getting richer while the poor sink even deeper into almost 3rd world conditions. No thanks, not looking forward to our next pm and his dumbo sized ears but I spose they can't do much worse..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • And if you want more power, more reliably, and cheaper, go get the Aussie RB... The 4L Barra and put that in instead.
    • No cats will keep discolouring the rear bar. Sends white paint a weird yellow stain. Cut and polish normally gets it out, but you'll be doing that every fortnight I found.
    • Both heads will be equally reliable or unreliable depending on what you do to them.  Stock the RB26 head will flow more. You have access to the stock intake ITB manifold on the RB26 cheaply which flows really well(1000hp+).   Arguably more aftermarket support for RB26, though in Aus we love our RB30 SOHC heads too.    The only downsides to the RB26 head is if you have a VL commodore and want to keep the SOHC look.  Where you may have an issue is drilling out the rb30 block for the bigger head studs but if you are building a big power motor you'd probably put bigger studs on the SOHC head too.  This is just about finding a good machine shop, sometimes easier said than done.  RB30 head worked can make big power just like a Rb26 head, so really it actually more comes down to what your preference is for your car.  People now even making billet versions of both.
    • 2630s work perfectly well. There is something to be said for just using the 30 head, as it saves all the pain of the conversion, still makes tons of power, still sounds cool, etc etc. 2630 will obviously make more power again, but the differences are not stupidly big. It really depends on whether you're racing for sheep stations or not. If it's dead serious, then it's a 26 head. If it's just for fun, it could go either way. But the 26 head and the effort to get it set up, etc etc, is part of the fun.
    • I've been building a 26/30 for a few years now. I've had the head built with all the good stuff. I had a 32 gtr but blew it up and yes its all going into a vl but im looking for some advice from some RB nuts on pros and cons on putting a 26 head on a 30 bottom end is it worth it Works are as follows Head -Extensive porting 1mm oversized supertech valves Supertech double springs Supertech valve guides Supertech titanium retainers Tomei solid lifters Tomei 270 x 10.25 cams Head drain Bottom end series 2 rb30 block Cp ceramic coated pistons Eagle rods Romac balancer Oil restrictions  O ringed blah blah spent a fortune And will get a girdle because the 30s arent used to handling that much rpm Nitto billet oil pump Hypertune plenum 6boost mani Refurbed astra pump thats the cover for it in the boot I did have a precision 6262 but sold it because drag car life. Currently building the ass end full 4 link floater rear end with a 2 speed  But the dilemma i have is my mate rekens I should just stick with the 30 head for reliability. Has any one had any issues with mounting the 26 head ie compression blowing gaskets etc. Just looking for some advice from people who have gone down this route. Here's some photos. Blew the oil pump in the gtr and decided to rip the motor out at the time and do a full build only to find it had been a repairable write off so went down this path.     
×
×
  • Create New...