Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So while changing my rad and hoses and installing a greddy style plenum I noticed my clutch fan is cracked in 15-20 spots at least.

I don't want to run the risk of it flying apart and have decided to install thermos. Wiring isnt a problem at all but i was told to use ef/el falcon fans.

I have changed the way the high pressure power steering line is run to get that out of the way but the fan motor is way to close to the belts and pulleys for my liking.

Wondering if maybe ford mondeo's are a better option or any other tips and tricks to make them fit?

Photos if possible would be great.

Thanks guys

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381202-r33-thermo-fan-help/
Share on other sites

The Falcon fan/shroud assembly needs to be trimmed by about 25mm, and some simple angle brackets made to mount it to the radiator. Not an exceedingly hard job for any competent sheet metal fabricator. You'll end up with about 10-15mm clearance between the fan motor and harmonic balancer, enough to get it all fitted in there nicely.

The pulley, or the way the high pressure line runs forward? I re-jigged that hard line and everything worked out nicely. The front most section of the harmonic balancer is what drives the power steering, so they are in the same plane. If one is a cleanance problem, then so is the other. Either way, sounds like you're on the right track. Modify the shroud, wire up the fans and alter the power steering line; away you go.

I can't say at this stage whether running thermos is warranted, or even better than the OE mechanical fan. It certainly works, but the sheer electrical drain means the alternator works harder so you still get parasitic losses to counteract much of the gain through deleting the mechanical fan.

No doubt there are plenty of opinions out there.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I'd suggest the answer to the first question is at least a qualified "yes". I'll come back to that. Pineapples just don't do a lot to solidify the mounting of the subframe. They do a little bit, and that little bit was clearly helpful to me in the past, but the main thing they are intended to be used for is to tip the orientation of the subframe to try to either dial in more or less anti-squat. You can install them one way to try to increase launch traction, or the other way to try to increase lateral grip (at the notional expense of longitudinal traction). Or, as I did, you install them neutral, which only really offers a little bit of "snugging" up of the subframe. When I did pineapples, that was the only option. No-one had a machined alloy collar like the GKTech ones. There were some other options, but nothing like the slip in collars. And it is clear from looking at them that they occupy almost all the free space inside the rubber bush, so they will do a lot to stop them moving internally. So I thought, "that's the game for me!". Obviously the next/adjacent step is poly bushes, but what's the point in doing that with all the work and hassle required to change them over, when jamming (and I mean literally jamming) some alloy into the rubber bushes probably gives an equivalent, or possibly even superior result? So, to go back to your 1st question, I would suggest, for the investment of <<$100 and a morning spent lying under the car swearing and getting some sore fingers, it is certainly something you should try. Who knows? Maybe your situation is so severe that it doesn't solve it. But it might help a lot. If your problem is as severe as you say it is, the next thing to look at is what the rest of the bushes in the rear end a made from. Things like the Hardrace arms with hardened rubber bushes might be a good thing (for the purposes of having adjustability AND stiffer bushes). Otherwise, just poly bushes throughout could be a help. Or following in my fever dream footsteps and putting a lot of sphericals into the rear? Eliminate undersired movement to avoid the build up of resonances that cause the tramp. Also, if you have adjustable uppers in the rear, and you haven't put effort into adjusting the traction arms to minimise bump steer, there might be some advantage in that. If you don't want to go to the effort of doing it yourself (like I am pretty much forced to in Adelaide, owing to a lack of race alignment specialists) then surely there's a place in Melbs that is able to do it. It will cost $$, But that's life.
    • As someone who has pineapples, and horrible axle tramp... should I change these to collars? Is that what you're saying here? Why did you choose these instead of getting pineapples where you said you had good experiences of? I'd love to even attempt to get rid of axle tramp, I either get complete bogginess or absolute insane wheelspin, anything even remotely in between results in filling-removal axle tramp, to the point where launching the car is just not something I do.
    • Lucky for that, because putting ethanol in fuel only lowers the bulk cost of fuel if it's in 91 Add it to 98, 85% of it even and it quintuples in price. Strange physics. f**k you United, Gouging c***ts.
    • Not noticeably. Arguably, the catless turbo is going to work harder in a different direction, as it will spool up faster, go to higher speeds more easily. Only if it was tuned in the original condition. If it was a stock tune, using the AFM before and after the cat/dump change, then no, no retune needed. If the car is running on a MAP sensor, then it might well benefit from a retune. It might even run a little dangerously without a retune, but it could quite easily be fine.
    • We had this blend that uses 98RON + 10% Ethanol which brought it to 100RON. It's no longer available anymore unfortunately.
×
×
  • Create New...