Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

My girlfriend is looking for a new car to replace her old Corolla. She wants a small, fuel efficient, good looking, 5dr car thats reliable to drive daily. She will probably keep this car for 10+ years. Her budget is $20,000-$30,000 but she'd be willing to spend more if the value for money is there.

We're looking at almost all Japanese and European hatches. We're also considering the CT200h Lexus Hybrid. Its $44k but my girlfriends brother works for Toyota/Lexus and gets a 21% discount on all cars. Does anyone have any experience with the Lexus or Hybrids in general? Is the Hybrid technology good enough to last 10 years and 200,000kms if maintained properly?

Of the other hatches avaliable, does anyone have any personal experience with any? Any you would or would not recommend?

Appreciate any feedback, cheers.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/381640-best-value-hatch-for-daily-driving/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Yesterday at Parramatta. $32K reduced from $39k is the Manual Citroën DS3 Sport. 1 left. Black. We looked Alfa Mito & Abarth too for another lady. The Auto DS3 isn't worth it since it drops the turbo.

Pretty much any of the small hatches from Ford, Holden or one of the Jap brands. Price wise/feature wise you could throw a hanky over the lot.

It's really a matter of which one does she like the look of better. Go test drive a few.

If I had to pick, however, it'd probably be a Festiva.

There's absolutely no need to spend upwards of $25k (in fact you should get change from $20k). I'd avoid the Euro brands.

Hybrid's are bullshit heavy and slow and not particularly fuel efficient. Lexus make great cars, but big money for a runabout, even with 21% off.

Recently I've driven an i30, Focus, Corolla, ix35, Dualis and a few others (Mrs is looking for a new car) and it's hard to find a bad one. The Focus was dynamically superior to the others, but cost more and in reality, for my wife, not really required.

Go test drive a metric shitload and buy the one which you gelled with the most.

Can you give us some more information please Keiran?

Perhaps you can answer these questions to help narrow down the selection criteria for us. I am looking at a near new (2008 or later) 5-door hatchback to replace my Peugeot 205 GTI that I've had for 14 years so I have been studying some of these models in depth.

  1. Does she want a brand new car or is she willing to get one that's a few years old and save thousands?
  2. Can your sister drive a manual?
  3. What size hatch does she want eg a Mini, VW Polo, Fiat 500, Citroen DS3 or the larger VW Golf, Ford Focus, Audi A3 size?
  4. If she buys a European car from the 'premium' brands like BMW, Merc, Audi or even the Japanese Lexus will she be able to afford the (usually more expensive) maintenance?
  5. Does she want a sports model like VW GTIs or Focus XR5 or is she happier with the more generic, better fuel economy models?

  1. Does she want a brand new car or is she willing to get one that's a few years old and save thousands?

She's willing to buy a demo model, but needs a new car. Her dad is paying $20,000 towards whatever she gets, but he is flat out against anything second hand.

2. Can your sister drive a manual?

My sister can, my girlfriend can't thumbsup.gif

3. What size hatch does she want eg a Mini, VW Polo, Fiat 500, Citroen DS3 or the larger VW Golf, Ford Focus, Audi A3 size.

Probably the slightly larger. She prefers the Golf over the Polo, but she'll consider them all.

4. If she buys a European car from the 'premium' brands like BMW, Merc, Audi or even the Japanese Lexus will she be able to afford the (usually more expensive) maintenance?

She could afford it, but I think it would be more than she realizes.

5. Does she want a sports model like VW GTIs or Focus XR5 or is she happier with the more generic, better fuel economy models?

She doesn't give a shit about performance, so long as its not absolutely gutless.

cant see why the latest 'rolla wouldnt be a good buy

corolla02.jpg

great build quality, excellent on fuel, CHEAP to service, looks great, and in manual its a hell of a lot of fun

totally worth the cash.

shit, even im thinking about it

This is what I'm pushing her towards. That 21% discount on an already excellent value car is just too good to pass up. Her main issue is she has driven a Corolla for the last 7-8 years and would like something else.

She likes the the FT-86 though, if only it were released this year!

She doesn't give a shit about performance, so long as its not absolutely gutless.

Corolla, Focus, 3, i30, Tiida (f**king stupid name that I believe is soon to be replaced by Pulsar again [yay!]), Civic, Lancer.

There's not a bad one amongst them. Spend a weekend test driving them all then pick the one you (she) liked best. You can't go wrong with any of them. They are a lot cheaper than the Euros, have nearly as many features and will be cheaper to run and more reliable (noting 10+ years ownership).

My pick would be VW Golf, preferably the Comfortline TSi (I think), 1.4l twin-charged unit anyway.

CHEAP on fuel, zippy, reliable & euro quality...

Only thing you would have to check out is servicing costs, etc

My pick would be VW Golf, preferably the Comfortline TSi (I think), 1.4l twin-charged unit anyway.

CHEAP on fuel, zippy, reliable & euro quality...

Only thing you would have to check out is servicing costs, etc

$35,000 later.

f**k that. It doesn't do anything one of the $22,000 japs won't do.

Get the 1.2L (i think?) gold brand spankers with DSG for 22, redbook says 77kw, 0-100 in 10.6 so not that bad.. Pretty economical...

Or you could get a japper for the same price with more features and 100+kw and a few seconds quicker to 100.

= not better than regular auto for the intended purpose here (regular A-B driving).

Probably cost more for servicing too.

You said she is not interested in performance so I would just play it safe & get another Corolla.

Edited by Mayuri Krab

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...