Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

im going back to the track as soon as i get my cage installed next week, new nittos, and adjust my clutch, then should be ready for some more launching.

excellent, I can't wait to see you run some good times

11.04@125 (1.8 60ft-grannied it of the line) in my 4.5L turbo toyota crown. (Mcrearey DOT tyres)

I realize it's not a skyline-but it's Japanese, 6cyl, 24 valve and runs a set GTR injectors..........

As for the radial tyres-Got Boost-it does appear that you are the dude I've pushed back to 8th in the current HPI list (sorry).....Although in a couple of issues the [email protected] I ran at the meeting after that puts me in 6th spot.

What are the Nittos you are running like mate? Currently I'm just using some tall Simex tyres cause they were cheap and tall (engine only revs to 6000 so I need all the gearing and tyre height I can get)-but the 11.37 is the best I think they will do. What $$ did you pay for them, where from, and would you recommend them?

Cheers dude

Sean

Adelaide

MS-75 ,

Don't tell me you have a 4.5 lt landcruiser engine in the crown !!!

I'm interested to know , how much boost are you running in the old truck engine ?

They are very tough engines biuld to last for ever ......

Looks like 10's are just around the corner .

you got it WRXhoon-it's a 1FZ-FE Landcrusher motor. It ran the 11.65 on 14psi-although the MPH was low at 108 as I backed off when it got a bit of a wobble up in the rear in the deep end of the track. (stock bushes in the rear end was the culprit) It had hit 124mph just before I backed off though. Next time out I had it at 17 psi, and had custom urethane bushes on board allowing me to keep the boot in for the whole 400, giving an 11.5, 11.37, 11.88 (too much gas-went up in smoke) then 11.04 on the semi-slicks. However the MPH (124-125) was the same as for 14 psi, so I don't think the 3psi made much difference (probably the stock plenum and cams I think-it's also nearly on the limiter at 125 so will need a change from 3.23 to 3.08 gears for more MPH). The 1FZ is certainly doing the job so far in relatively stock trim (except for a bit of head port smoothing and combustion chamber mods to dro compression)-and I'm getting stuck into more injectors, custom plenum and re-ground cams soon as well. If I actually stall it up off the line next meet it should go 10.90 or so as is.

It was really an experiment to see if the 1FZ turbo idea would work, and it's proving to be far better than I'd expected. (but yes-the weight distribution is average-however the Crown handles like a turd anyway :throwup: and it's only meant for 1/4 work)

Cheers

Sean

It must be one of the quickest 1fz on the planet .

they turbo them in the middle east but they have to push 21/4 ton landcruiser so they can't be that quick but yea they have heaps of torque and you wont blow them up in hurry ...

Yea they would be very heavy at the front of the old crown . How old is the crown ? mid 80's model ? Still auto ?

As for the radial tyres-Got Boost-it does appear that you are the dude I've pushed back to 8th in the current HPI list (sorry).....Although in a couple of issues the [email protected] I ran at the meeting after that puts me in 6th spot.

Cheers dude

Sean

Adelaide

yeah thats me. my nittos are passed their use by date now and with the new turbo and cams in the power is much more on/off and its much harder to get away without bogging or smokin them hard. im hopin to race again friday night on full slicks again but with proper front tyres to match. you'll be lucky to find nitto's here mine were privately imported as far as know. try some bf goodrich drag radials.

Sean

Perth

Cheers 2RISMO-I had a look, but unfortunately they're 16inch-and I've got 15inch rims-

Has anyone on SAU got experience with the BFG's? I'd be curious as to their impressions.

The ones I had in mind are the 275-60 DragRadials (I borrowed a 275 60 Comp T/A to check sizes and they fill the guards perfectly). I just have to flog off a spare turbo I have to fund them. I'm planning on fitting the car with custom cams, the two new Tial 38mm gates I just bought (it runs two w/g's-one for each half of the split-pulse turbine/manifold set-up), tuning it on jungle juice of some form to about 20psi and fitting it with the drag radials for a crack at the radial tyre record for 6cyl rwd in HPI by the end of the summer. (10.4 is bloody moving though........and I may just end up with a 1FZ block filed with mangled engine parts instead :boohoo: )

I'll probably be hanging around here a fair bit as the skyline community has got a lot of valuable experience with big power turbo sixes. At the moment I'm investigating what would be a good cam profile for it-who is the expert on such matters around here?

The toyota crowd is (for the most part) more into the sprinter/celica 4cyl side of things.(slowly changing though with the 1JZ-2JZ becoming more common).

Anyway-take it easy-and I'll stop clogging this thread with my garbage now. Nice to meet you fellows. (although I'll start clogging other ones no doubt...=-)

Sean

Adelaide

  • 1 year later...

My first time ever on the strip, R33 gts25t typeM. full trim. BP ultimate. 10psi. using my 18's with kumho street tyres 265x35x18 :(. coudlnt fit my spares in my boot. so i just let pressure down to 26psi. will definently be back , chasing 12's with a few new mods and some decent tyres. im sure the car has a low to flat 13 in it, if i could just launch it properly. still yet to get it tuned yet, all mods done myself. only spent well sweet f*k all on the car so far.

FMIC

AVC-R black.

Pod K&N

HKS super Dragger from turbo back. 3" to 3.5ish

react time:1.121

60ft:2.180

660 spd:80.62 MPH

qmET: 13.935 @ 102.58 MPH

post-31857-1162524448.jpg

Edited by silverbulletR33

1st time at drags, at the SAU vic drag day Heathcote... was dissapointed not to crack into 13's...

Was in low 14's all day.

R33 Gtst, 12psi, safc, exhaust, intercooler 192rwkw...

14.13 @ 106.61

60ft 2.4...

+

14.18 @ 103.66

60ft 2.39...

mixture of poor driving + poor tyres still on from japan (255's bridgestone playz) explains the 60fts i guess. Although everyone was saying it was slippery and even the 4wd boys were getting some wheel spin.

Reaction time .123

60 foot 1.963

1000 foot 11.173

ET 13.354 MPH 103.23

Cheap Street tyres Bridgestone G grid or something. 215/65/R15

post-13785-1162866613.jpg

Second timeslip is just to share my fluke which won me some coin

post-13785-1162866639.jpg

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • When I need something else to edit, I use Movavi. A friend who does video editing on a daily basis recommended me) it's an easy video cutter to use for beginners
    • I need to edit some videos for work but I'm not good at all this. Which video editor can you recommend?
    • I think you're really missing the point. The spec is just the minimum spec that the fuel has to meet. The additive packages can, and do, go above that minimum if the fuel brand feels they need/want to. And so you get BP Ultimate or Shell Ultra (or whatever they call it) making promises to clean your engine better than the standard stuff....simply because they do actually put better additive packages in there. They do not waste special sauce on the plebian fuel if they can avoid it. I didn't say "energy density". I just said "density". That's right, the specific gravity (if you want to use a really shit old imperial description for mass per unit volume). The density being higher indicates a number of things, from reduces oxygen content, to increased numbers of double bonds or cyclic components. That then just happens to flow on to the calorific value on a volume basis being correspondingly higher. The calorific value on a mass basis barely changes, because almost all hydrocarbon materials have a very similar CV per kg. But whatever - the end result is that you do get a bit more energy per litre, which helps to offset some of the sting of the massive price bump over 91. I can go you one better than "I used to work at a fuel station". I had uni lecturers who worked at the Pt Stanvac refinery (at the time they were lecturing, as industry specialist lecturers) who were quite candid about the business. And granted, that was 30+ years ago, and you might note that I have stated above that I think the industry has since collected together near the bottom (quite like ISPs, when you think about it). Oh, did I mention that I am quite literally a combustion engineer? I'm designing (well, actually, trying to avoid designing and trying to make the junior engineer do it) a heavy fuel oil firing system for a cement plant in fricking Iraq, this week. Last week it was natural gas fired this-that. The week before it was LPG fired anode furnaces for a copper smelter (well, the burners for them, not the actual furnaces, which are just big dumb steel). I'm kinda all over fuels.
    • Well my freshly rebuilt RB25DET Neo went bang 1000kms in, completely fried big end bearing in cylinder 1 so bad my engine seized. No knocking or oil pressure issue prior to this happening, all happened within less than a second. Had Nitto oil pump, 8L baffled sump, head drain, oil restrictors, the lot put in to prevent me spinning a bearing like i did to need the rebuild. Mechanic that looked after the works has no idea what caused it. Reckoned it may have been bearing clearance wrong in cylinder 1 we have no idea. Machinist who did the work reckoned it was something on the mechanic. Anyway thats between them, i had no part in it, just paid the money Curiosity question, does the oil system on RB’s go sump > oil pump > filter > around engine? If so, if you had a leak on an oil filter relocation plate, say sump > oil pump > filter > LEAK > around engine would this cause a low oil pressure reading if the sensors was before the filter?   TIA
    • But I think you missed mine.. there is also nothing about the 98 spec that supports your claim..  according to the fuel standards, it can be identical to 95, just very slightly higher octane number. But the ulp vs pulp fuel regulations go show 95 (or 98), is not just 91 with some additives. any claim of ‘refined by the better refineries’ or ‘higher quality fuel’ is just hearsay.  I have never seen anything to back up such claims other than ‘my mate used to work for a fuel station’, or ‘drove a fuel delivery truck’, or ‘my mechanic says’.. the actual energy densities do slightly vary between the 3 grades of fuel, but the difference is very minor. That said, I am very happy to be proven wrong if anyone has some hard evidence..
×
×
  • Create New...