Jump to content
SAU Community

SAU 1/4 Mile Times (v2)


Recommended Posts

does it really matter who was driving, anyways i have the time slip that i ran 11.1 if its that important at least that can get updated, the owners of the quickest rotors and the quickest drag arnt always driven by the owner.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old man's clutch will never be the same! ;-)

whats this old man's business mate ?

i think the boy drove it like it was stolen , his 60 ft was 1.7.. but he hit the cutout in 3rd gear , still managed 11.75 but cause he missed the gear change t.s was only118 mph , with a good gear change he would have run 11.5 -11.6 .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whats this old man's business  mate ?

i think the boy drove it like it was stolen , his 60 ft was 1.7.. but he hit the cutout in 3rd gear , still managed 11.75 but cause he missed the gear change t.s was only118 mph , with a good gear change he would have run 11.5 -11.6 .

Hee hee! All right motor daddy, you badder than bad!

Now to convert Nick to the world of 6 cylinders where WRX spells rear vision mirror!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
Guest KILLER-T

R33 GTS-t

Bridgestone Potenza's 255/40/17 RE540s @ 28 PSI

Elapsed Time 12.629

terminal Speed 111.11 MPH 178.81 Kph

Reaction Time 0.034

60 2.067

330 5.448

660 8.221

1000 10.618

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

At SAU Drag Day today at WSID first time out shot my mouth off, said "Should do 11 sec. First run missed did a 12.18 later did a

Temp 20 C

ET 11.56

60ft 1.91

130.19mph

Result. Beat all the Skylines there. Oh I should not say that.

johndrag.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No I am over the hill remember. Sorry about that.

Wreckedhead I am waiting for you to turn up one day, will be fun. Will that be soon?

Will it be circuit, drag or drift, I don't mind?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, yeah, the RB26 is definitely that far off the mark. From a pure technology point of view it is closer to the engines of the 60s than it is to the engines of the last 10 years. There is absolutely nothing special about an RB26 that wasn't present in engines going all the way back to the 60s, except probably the four valve head. The bottom end is just bog standard Japanese stuff. The head is nothing special. Celicas in the 70s were the same thing, in 4cyl 2 valve form. The ITBs are nothing special when you consider that the same Celicas had twin Solexes on them, and so had throttle plates in the exact same place. There's no variable valve timing, no variable inlet manifold, which even other RBs had either before the 26 came out or shortly afterward. The ECU is pretty rude and crude. The only things it has going for it are that the physical structure was pretty bloody tough for a mass produced engine, the twin-turbos and ITBs made for a bit of uniqueness against the competition (and even Toyota were ahead on the twin turbs thing, weren't they?) and the electronic controls and measuring devices (ie, AFMs, CAS, etc) were good enough to make it run well. Oh, and it sounds better than almost anything else, ever. The VR38 is absolutely halfway between the RB generation and the current generation, so it definitely has a massive increase in the sophistication of the electronics, allowing for a lot more dynamic optimisation of mapping. Then there's things like metal treatments and other coatings on things, adoption of variable cam stuff, and a bunch of other little improvements that mean it has to be a better thing than the RB26. But I otherwise agree with you that it is approximately the same thing as a 26. But, skip forward another 10 years from that engine and then the things that I mentioned in previous post come out to play. High compression, massively sophisticated computers, direct injection, clever measuring sensors, etc etc. They are the real difference between trying to make big power with a 26 and trying to make big power with a S/B50/54 (or whatever the preferred BMW engine of the week is).
    • Is the RB26 actually that far off the mark? Honestly from where I'm sitting a VR38DETT is not actually that much more advanced than the RB26. Yes, there is a scavenge pump on the VR38, it's smarter in a number of ways but it's not actually jumping out to me as alien technology. Something like a B58 or V35A-FTS on the other hand has so many surprising little design features that add up to be something that just isn't comparable. 
    • https://www.carsales.com.au/cars/details/2021-nissan-skyline-400r-auto-rv37/SSE-AD-17857548/ Well there you go 
    • Chris won't reply. He doesn't visit the forum much anymore. You can try these guys https://www.facebook.com/autotainment/ They did mine many years ago
×
×
  • Create New...