Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The 2600k is i7 branding also not just i5.

http://ark.intel.com/products/52214/Intel-Core-i7-2600K-Processor-(8M-Cache-3_40-GHz)

Same price too, why not i say!

i7 branding is only good for e-penis length :P

Plus it's ~$100 more expensive, not the same price.

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

1321915308[/url]' post='6120664']

images-3.jpg

1321919677[/url]' post='6120772']

:laugh:

Exactly what i thought when i read it :whistling:

Well said! that's why I gave up! Cant believe I was dumb enough to try. So how did you overclock yours. I know enough too just leave it alone

i7 branding is only good for e-penis length :P

Plus it's ~$100 more expensive, not the same price.

Without looking into it i would say they would be higher binned chips potentially.

This is usually the way such things work (same as steppings) leading to better overclocks also.

Will do more reading especially with the 2700k coming out shortly and overclock results starting to crop up - but some people are getting 5.0ghz on AIR from a 2700k where most 2600k are 4.6-4.8 on air from what I've ready.

Very keen to watch how they go.

i have that exact same board. well, actually, ive had 2 of them now >.< had alot of issues with them heating up and sharting themselves. ive gone to an ASUS board now, see how it goes. On a good note, the warranty was a fast turnaround and good response time from gigaflop.

1321953481[/url]' post='6121778']

Without looking into it i would say they would be higher binned chips potentially.

This is usually the way such things work (same as steppings) leading to better overclocks also.

Will do more reading especially with the 2700k coming out shortly and overclock results starting to crop up - but some people are getting 5.0ghz on AIR from a 2700k where most 2600k are 4.6-4.8 on air from what I've ready.

Very keen to watch how they go.

Any results for what they get on water?

Thinking back it was the gtx295 that was 30% overclocked not the CPU, only did the shaders and gpu, didn't do anything with the voltages. The CPU was just the multiplier spreadsheet said I had +4, i was trying to go from 3.02 to 4 or 4.5, which was meant to be easy on water, but once again I didn't set voltages just left them on auto. Time to find the overclockers forum I guess.

Any results for what they get on water?

Thinking back it was the gtx295 that was 30% overclocked not the CPU, only did the shaders and gpu, didn't do anything with the voltages. The CPU was just the multiplier spreadsheet said I had +4, i was trying to go from 3.02 to 4 or 4.5, which was meant to be easy on water, but once again I didn't set voltages just left them on auto. Time to find the overclockers forum I guess.

Depending on the board auto can be much much worse than setting the voltage manually.

1322174207[/url]' post='6125735']

Depending on the board auto can be much much worse than setting the voltage manually.

The board is gigabyte GA-EX58 Extreme, so may be a got some bad advice then, I was told with that board it was best to just leave the voltages at auto, this probably explains all my problems

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...