Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Slightly more power.

This was my first turbo upgrade and I have to say they are very laggy for the power output. You can get better gains/response from a Garrett upgrade however the costs are far greater.

Bang for your buck highflows are ok.

Thanks,

I actually fitted a high flowed unit (non OP6) a while ago and I do

not find it 'that' laggy compared to the standard turbo.

By coincidence I now got this OP6 turbo and was not sure if it was worth to throw

that one in.

So it's basically the same turbine wheel with a bigger housing then?

I thought the high-flow workshop might use a larger wheel in that housing.

Slightly more power.

This was my first turbo upgrade and I have to say they are very laggy for the power output. You can get better gains/response from a Garrett upgrade however the costs are far greater.

Bang for your buck highflows are ok.

What people call the OP6 turbine housing is a slightly larger version of what R33 RB25DETs get std , and dimensionally are almost the same .

Nissan seems to have had a habit of using larger , but not huge , turbine housings on larger engines in low boost pressure apps . Examples that come to mind are L28ETs RB30ETs and four cam VG30DETs . The idea is to not restrict the exhaust path too much in a larger low boost and sometimes non intercooled engine . I believe with the Z32 300ZX the reasoning was to get a heavy car going from low speeds and just cruising around - not a real high performance application .

If you use these turbine housings on smaller engines ie RB20s or RB25s with no other changes what it does is reduce the gas speed through the housing and reduces the turbine wheels speed for a given engine speed . Some people like OP6 housings on RB25s because they fit straight in and allow more power to be made at higher revs at the expense of low rev turbo response . If they modified their 25 it can make a bit better low speed torque than std which covers what they lost initially .

Some later R34 GTt RB25s use this housing too but its part of a system including different cams chambers and piston crowns slightly larger intercooler etc . All together they boosted the performance from ~ 184Kw to I think 206 kw .

I don't remember reading of anyone who liked these housings on RB20's because they slow the turbine response too much in an engine that probably needs boost as soon as possible . For a budget upgrade on RB25s they are good and probably essential if you built an RB30/25 and had to run the std turbo for some reason .

Hi flows are a different story and particularly the plain bearing ones , these will have more oil shear drag than a ball bearing centre sections do so theres a lot of potential to gain extra turbine lag with larger wheels and a larger turbine housing . The good news is that Nissans , Hitachis , ceramic turbine is small in diameter so these turbine housings can be machined to accept Garrett BB cartridges and conservatively sized ones can work quite well ie GT2871Rs .

The main thing to remember is that these housings and Hi Flows will always be a compromise and not quite as good as a turbo designed for a specific purpose .

A .

Hello,

I was wondering if there is any substantial benefit from

high-flowing an OP6 turbo as compared to the standard (high-flowed) unit?

To be exact 20kws and 45Mn increase based on the same chra. Has the potentical of making 320rwkws+ depending on how its been high flowed.

There are plenty of good turbos for cheap on the market there days I wouldn't spend money on a high flow but if your on a budget they are very good value

THIS

High-flows were good back in the days of Jap turbo kits for $8k or trying to adapt a little GT28 onto an RB.

Who Remembers the Sliding Performance turbos Aaron was doing?

Cheap and cheerful, but I dont think any of them lasted more than 12 months (I dont know of a single car that has one on it anymore)

High-flows will always have their place and it is good that GCG are still doing theirs and Stao/Hypergear and getting some very good results now, but they are a compromise..and I don't really like that aspect when it comes to outright performance (I had a MTQ high flow on my 33 for a long time)

Hello there,

Thanks for the feedbacks, much appreciated.

The OP6 Turbo is off an R34GTT, so same engine (as for cubic inches) as my R33GTSTS2.

What I got out of your replies is that the OP6 basically comes down to a different A/R?

So if OP6 is High-Flowed, the same turbine wheel is used (maybe?)

As for High-Flowing or not I have to say that I was attracted by the 'drop in' aspect of these.

My genuine turbo fell apart so high flowing it was the first option which came to mind.

However when I installed the new Turbo I had to find out the there was some struggling with the oil-feed and water lines.

(These were essentially minor issues, but I never had done this before so it took some time to get the right lines made)

Though the High-Flowed is not a ball bearing (as opposed to the genuine turbo) it does a good job and I feel it is not much different to the genuine unit )maybe 300-400rpm lag).

I will be on a dyno soon and post the boost curves.

Thanks, and cheers from London

Edited by Torques

Kando dynamics are good turbos and cheaper then high flows in some cases I have a td06 and would buy one over a high flow any day. Also if you shop around you can pick up second hand hks and Garret turbos that people used for a 1000k and wanted more power For under a 1000 bucks. Iv also heard high flows get hot really quick due to such big wheels in small housings a lot of resistance

Once again depending on how its been high flowed. I can high flow a OP6 with same / better performance as your TD06 with consistent out put, nothing gets hot. High flowed turbocharger saves major modifications to existing exhaust side setup. The real value in its power range is generally cheaper then a complete aftermarket setup, it also set you free from defects and cop problems.

How ever performance factor running tune length exhaust manifolds, intake, external gate and other enhancements supporting an aftermarket turbo will obviously gain better results then what came out of the factory. Its the result of a complete package rather then the turbocharger alone. Having said that, building a brand new turbocharger suiting its purpose efficiently is easier then modifying a turbo that was built for some thing else.

The decision should be made based on the useage of the car as, performance goal and over all cost.

Hi ..

Yes, I looked into these Kando turbos for a while.

I found them interesting, but (and if you're talking about the TD06H series)

1. only oil cooled (except for TD06H-20G)

2. exhaust side does not match the R33 dump

3. turbo outlet does not attach to standard piping

4. oil/water connectors require custom lines

5. journal bearing (so no advantage over HF turbo)

Here's the TD06H you might have had in mind(?)

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/Kinugawa-Turbocharger-3-Nissan-RB25DET-R33-TD06H-20G-/280763016554?pt=AU_Car_Parts_Accessories&hash=item415ec7a56a

So that's why I went for the high flowed which actually seems to be quite nice... :)

(though I have no other comparison than the standard turbo)

Kando dynamics are good turbos and cheaper then high flows in some cases I have a td06 and would buy one over a high flow any day. Also if you shop around you can pick up second hand hks and Garret turbos that people used for a 1000k and wanted more power For under a 1000 bucks. Iv also heard high flows get hot really quick due to such big wheels in small housings a lot of resistance

post-33912-0-34776400-1321199617_thumb.jpg

post-33912-0-00481700-1321199650_thumb.jpg

post-33912-0-10515300-1321200254_thumb.jpg

Edited by Torques

You can get them t3 I'm using one on a stock manifold turbo comes as a kit all lines come with it. Yes the dump needs changing and cooler pipe extended but that's nothing big. If your happy with the highflow then sweet I'm not saying they are bad I'm just stating for the money you pay for a highflow you can get a bigger turbo all together then add 200 for dump and cooler pipe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I think my main complaint with your idea is that there is a veneer of idealism spread across it. You want the simple numbers to make it easier, but all they will do is make it easier for someone to come to the wrong conclusion because the fine details will kick them in the nuts. As it is right now, the tiny bit of arithmetic is NOT the obstacle to understanding what will fit and what will not fit. The reality of trying it is what determines whether it will fit. If you had a "standard rule" that R34 GTT guards have that magic 100mm space from the hub face to whichever side you were worried about, and someone said "excellent, this wheel is only 98mm in that direction, I'll just go spend $4k on them and jam them on my sick ride".....they would just as likely find out that the "standard rule" is not true because the rear subframe is offset to one side by a fairly typical (but variable) 8mm on their car and they only have 92mm on one side and 108 on the other.
    • It still combines inches with mm, especially when you have .5 inches involved, and mm and inches that can go in either direction. This would give a clear idea on both sides of the rim, right away, with no arithmetic. Even better if somebody gives you the dimensions of the arch of multiple cars. i.e GTR may be 125mm, a A80 Supra may be 117mm, or something along those lines. Yes, you can 'know' that going from a 10in rim to a 10.5in rim with the same offset moves both sides about 6mm, but you still have to 'know' that and do the math. Often it's combined. People are going from 9.5 +27 to 10.5 +15. You may do the math to know it, but if it was going from (I had to go look it up to be sure) 241mm/2 - 27 - 93.5mm from the center line to (more math) 266/2 - 15 (118mm) from the center line. Versus 93mm vs 118mm. It's right there. If you know you have a GTT with 100mm guards you can see right away that one is close to flush and the other absolutely won't work. And when someone says "Oh the GTR is 120mm" suddenly you see that the 10.5 +15 is about perfect. (or you go and buy rims with approximately 118mm outward guard space) I think it's safe to say that given one of the most common questions in all modified cars is "How do offsets work" and "How do I know if wheels will fit on my car" that this would be much simpler... Of course, nothing will really change and nobody is going to remanufacture wheels and ditch inches and offset based on this conversation :p We'll all go "18x9+30 will line up pretty close to the guards for a R34 GTT (84mm)" but 'pretty close' is still not really defined (it is now!) and if you really care you still have go measure. Yes it depends on camber and height and dynamic movement, but so do all wheels no matter what you measure it for.
    • But offsets are simple numbers. 8" wheel? Call it 200mm, near enough. +35 offset? OK, so that means the hub face is that far out from the wheel centreline. Which is 2s of mental arithmetic to get to 65mm to outer edge and 135mm to inner. It's hardly any more effort for any other wheel width or offset. As I said, I just close my eyes and can see a picture of the wheel when given the width and offset. That wouldn't help me trust that a marginal fitment would actually go in and clear everything, any more than the supposedly simple numbers you're talking about. I dunno. Maybe I just automatically do numbers.
    • Sure! But you at least have simple numbers instead of 8.5 inches +/mm, relative to your current rims you do maths with as well, and/or compare with OEM diameter, which you also need to know/research/confirm..
×
×
  • Create New...