Jump to content
SAU Community

D90 Vs D7000

josh23457

By josh23457,
in Photography

 Share

Recommended Posts

josh23457 Enthusiast

josh23457

Posted
Posted

i currently have a D90- but its now being repalced under warranty! As a result im torn between 2 states of mind

- Keep the D90 my nly issue was its appauling build quality - better luck on the 2nd one

- Pay some extra cash and upgrade to the D7000

Anyone have much experience with the D7000??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383133-d90-vs-d7000/
Share on other sites
MaTBoY Grand Master

MaTBoY

Posted
Posted

you must gotten unlucky dude. i've got a D90, it's been out in the rain, dropped, abused and mroe. would have about billion shots on it and it's marching as strong as day one.

having said that, I've played with a couple of D7000 and it's a clear upgrade. Work out if you want to spend the money though. It might be the D90 is everything and more than you want.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383133-d90-vs-d7000/#findComment-6111429
Share on other sites
josh23457 Enthusiast

josh23457

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Totally upgrade to a D7000. They actually feel really nice in your hand (I'm a canon person) and the upgraded AF and IQ is great. In the end, you sound like you're going to upgrade anyway! :)

Ended up going the D7000 :) My D90 was almost 2 years old and i really didn't want to get stuck with that technology for a few more years. Nothing wrong with the photos it took i was always blown away, but with higher IQ and Upgraded AF it just made sense. Its nice its also a little heavier and pretty much the same size with button locations so nothing to really get used to!!!!!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383133-d90-vs-d7000/#findComment-6112866
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
barraspalding Mentor

barraspalding

Posted
Posted

AF-S 35mm f1.8 is a very nice affordable lens. Would be even better on a D7000 as it takes beautiful pics on my shitty d40x.

DSC_1153.jpg

I did have a Sigma 50mm f1.4 which was unreal, just beautiful bokeh. BUT it had a mis-focus issue with the d40x, had it replaced with a 2nd lens and same issue.

A higher spec camera can calibrate for this i was told.

DSC_67062-1.jpg

I think it was focused on her chin instead of her eyes.

45degree test showed the problem

14_crop.jpg

F1.4

28_crop.jpg

F2.8

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/383133-d90-vs-d7000/#findComment-6225816
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      PULSAR PSR2860R 0.86A/R or 0.64 GEN 2 Turbocharger Both are -50*67mm 8 blade billet compressor wheel Cheers  
    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      This isn't for lotsa powers, and time and effort isn't even a thing I'm concerned about The whole reason is "Just because fun", and "Just because fun" is what I do And whilst there are other kits, with better and more modern turbos (Rev9 use the same Kraken manifold I believe.....EDIT... nope, the Kraken is a cast jobbie, the REv9 uses welded up stainless, plus $8000 AUD before shipping, installation and tuning) Where else in Sydney can I do a drive in drive out with the after sales support that MX5 Mania give My Turbo 86 made around 200kwatw on a AVO turbo kit that Pulse fitted, and it was over 100kg heavier than the MX5, but it was a blast to drive around the streets, until I crashed it.....DOOH, so somewhere around 200 ish level and some whooshy noises and I'll be happy driving to work, the shops, or heading into the country with Jackie for Devonshire tea So, thanks Dose for your info, it sounds like a 0.64 will be fine for what I'm after👍 The only real racing I do nowadays is to the toilet
    • The Bogan
      NC MX5

      By The Bogan · Posted

      This isn't for lotsa powers, and time and effort isn't even a thing I'm concerned about The whole reason is "Just because fun", and "Just because fun" is what I do And whilst there are other kits, with better and more modern turbos (Rev9 use the same Kraken manifold I believe), where in Sydney can I do a drive in drive out with the after sales support that MX5 Mania give My Turbo 86 made around 200kwatw on a AVO turbo kit, and was over 100kg heavier than the MX5, but it was a blast to drive around the streets, until I crashed it.....DOOH, so somewhere around 200 ish level and some whooshy noises and I'll be happy driving to work, the shops, or heading into the country with Jackie for Devonshire tea So, thanks Dose for your info, it sounds like a 0.64 will be fine for what I'm after👍 The only real racing I do nowadays is to the toilet  
    • Mitchp77
      UniClutch

      By Mitchp77 · Posted

      Hey @Butters, did you end up getting this clutch in ? I have just ordered to a uniclutch track to go in my getrag 6 speed that’s in my BNR 32     
    • Murray_Calavera
      NC MX5

      By Murray_Calavera · Posted

      I know you don't want to hear this comment, but I can't not say it.  I just can't see 200kw being worth the time and effort. Its like guys with NA cars, putting in headers/exhaust/tune for a massive 20% jump in power. Great, the slow car is still slow and you're down $10,000.  My vote is leave it NA or price in a gearbox upgrade and shoot for at least 300KW, preferably 350KW+.  Now you have a NC that will try to kill you from time to time and will be exciting to drive
×
×
  • Create New...