Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

-R33 GTS-T series 2 1997,

- Manual

- 124,000kms

- Stock as a rock just with a nice cat-back and splitfire coil packs

-100% immaculate

- Sunroof

- Genuine Skyline floor mats like new

- Apexi turbo timer

$8250 :)

I think I know the one you bought, looked clean in the car sales pics, good price, did he sell it with a rwc for that price?

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Na no RWC but he had it checked by a RWC inspector and gave me the list of what needs doing which is like nothing! a tie rod end, break line and hand break (needs tightening) :)

The reason there are soo many 33's is because Nissan made/sold almost 250,000 in Japan, Compared to around 83,000 R34's. I myself was looking at 33's (because of price) then I done a bit of research and found out there is a reason they're cheap. Lol. Who would buy them?......cause there cheap, Young 18 year olds who just want a 'fully sick skyline bro', they don't care how thrashed they are, there just after the 'look'... Impress their GF's and stuff. 33's are dirt cheap these days $6K is about average price.

Indeed......

Or in my case,

-R33 GTST Series 1 1993

-Auto when I got it

-149,000kms

-17's

-Alloy radiator with thermo's

-Basic pioneer stereo

-Slotted disc's

$2500 (non complied, race/rally use only)

I am not ethnic or consider myself fully sik, but you cant argue with the bang for buck out of a second hand R33.

My car will be used only for sprints, hillclimbs, motorkhanas etc .

For not alot of money I got it converted to manual , done the exhaust , EBC, Fuel pump , Steering wheel etc. , its a good platform with reliable power , handling and braking.

I would never get one this cheap/rough for a daily, but for something to give some sh1t.... well played sir.

Edited by Ricky_Bobby

1996 R33 GTST Series 1

108 XXX on the clock

3 inch turbo back

Turbosmart tee

FMIC

Got mine as a recovered vehicle with the import plate taken. Paid $1900 thinking if I couldn't register it again I could just part it out, turned out I could register it. After replacing the bits that where taken/broken in the theft cost about

$5500-$6000.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Very decent bit of kit. Definitely black it out I reckon.  
    • Because people who want that are buying euros. The people with the money to buy the aftermarket heads and blocks aren’t interested in efficiency or making -7 power, they’re making well over 1,000hp and pretty much only drive them at full throttle  best way to way make money is know your customer base and what they want and don’t spend money making things they don’t want. 
    • It's not, but it does feel like a bit of a missed opportunity regardless. For example, what if the cylinder head was redesigned to fit a GDI fuel system? It's worth like two full points of compression ratio when looking at modern GDI turbo vs PFI turbo. I'm pretty reliably surprised at how much less turbo it takes to make similar power out of a modern engine vs something like an RB26. Something with roughly the same dimensions as a -7 on an S55 is making absolutely silly power numbers compared to an RB26. I know there's a ton of power loss from things like high tension rings, high viscosity oil, clutch fan, AWD standby loss, etc but it's something like 700 whp in an F80 M3 vs 400 whp in an R33 GTR. The stock TF035HL4W turbos in an F80 M3 are really rather dinky little things and that's enough to get 400 whp at 18 psi. This just seems unwise no? I thought the general approach is if you aren't knock limited the MFB50 should be held constant through the RPM range. So more timing with RPM, but less timing with more cylinder filling. A VE-based table should accordingly inverse the VE curve of the engine.
    • I've seen tunes from big name workshops with cars making in excess of 700kW and one thing that stood out to me, is that noone is bothering with torque management. Everyone is throwing in as much timing as the motor can take for a pull. Sure that yields pretty numbers on a dyno, but it's not keeping these motors together for more than a few squirts down the straight without blowing coolant or head gaskets. If tuners, paid a bit more attention and took timing out in the mid range, managed boost a bit better, you'll probably see less motors grenading. Not to name names, or anything like that, but I've seen a tune, from a pretty wild GT-R from a big name tuner and I was but perplexed on the amount of timing jammed into it. You would have expected a quite a bit less timing at peak torque versus near the limiter, but there was literally 3 degrees of difference. Sure you want to make as much as possible throughout the RPM range, but why? At the expense of blowing motors? Anyhow I think we've gone off topic enough once again lol.
    • Because that’s not what any of them are building these heads or blocks for. It’s to hold over over 1000hp at the wheels without breaking and none of that stuff is required to make power 
×
×
  • Create New...