Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

all williams need to do next year is put this man in the team;

http://www.prostfan.com/nicolas.htm

imagine the money they would get having a prost and senna back in the team. I know nick is too old now for F1 but imagine the publicity

Rejuvenated Williams targeting brighter 2012 season 18 Jan 2012

There’s no doubting the 2011 season was a bitter pill for Williams to swallow. Ninth in the standings after scoring five points was their worst-ever campaign. But rather than going to ground, the British team are intent on making amends to their steadfast fans and fighting their way back up the order.

As a result, changes have been afoot at their Oxfordshire base for some time, with a new engine courtesy of Renault, a revised technical team and - most recently - a new driver in Bruno Senna just some of the alterations underway. And chief operations engineer Mark Gillan is hopeful they will make a difference and that the team could be back fighting for top-ten race results in 2012.

“Obviously it will be quite a significant improvement in performance but that is our goal and I am reasonably confident looking forward that we will achieve that goal,” he said. “We want to be consistently in points and in the top ten. We want to be through to Q3 and scoring points at the end of the race. I am confident that we can achieve that goal.

“The overall development of the car is going well and is on plan. We are scheduled for first testing at the beginning of February. The car build has just started and the process has dramatically changed from last season to make sure we capture any faults along the way as quickly as possible and not have as many issues as we had last season.

“We passed all the various crash tests before Christmas. General performance trends look very encouraging and again the processes in terms of development and on the design side have dramatically changed. So it’s looking very encouraging. Going forwards, I’d say we are on target.”

One reason for Gillan’s optimism is the FIA’s clampdown on engine mapping and exhaust positioning. Some teams in 2011 gained a huge aerodynamic advantage by using the car’s exhaust gases, but new regulations prevent such activity. The British engineer is hopeful the change could see a much smaller variation in performance across the field, although he doesn’t rule out the possibility of new, must-have innovations taking its place.

“One of the big differentiators last year was the exhaust blowing but the FIA have curtailed its use by both the geometric change to the exhausts, which now have to be rearward facing and you’re not allowed to re-ingest exhaust gas back into the bodywork, and also they have changed the engine mapping,” he explained.

“There were teams that could utilise that and teams that couldn’t, and that is effectively neutered for this season so that will take a few teams back and bring everything closer. With the KERS and DRS it obviously opens up the overtaking opportunities and the racing should be closer than it has been. But then there’s always the next f-duct, trick floor, blown exhaust for this year but it’s just a question of what that will be.”

One stumbling block for Williams could be the relative inexperience of their driver roster. With Senna replacing veteran Rubens Barrichello alongside Pastor Maldonado and reserve Valtteri Bottas, it means the team has a line-up which boasts just 45 Grand Prix starts and 19 test days of experience. Gillan, however, is relishing the challenge and is confident the move will pay off.

“It obviously puts added pressure on the operations side, but to me it is an opportunity,” he concluded. “We have three reasonably inexperienced drivers, but three with great potential and it is up to us as a team - and the drivers - to effectively unlock that potential through the season and maximise the performance. So I see it as an opportunity.”

Although Williams are yet to announce when they will launch the FW34, the team are expected in attendance at the opening pre-season test at the Spanish circuit of Jerez from February 7-10.

Hill; F1 will miss Barrichello

Damon Hill believes that Formula 1 will miss Rubens Barrichello if the Brazilian does not return to the grid after missing out on the Williams seat.

Barrichello turns 40 this year and although he has always maintained his desire to continue to race in F1, with only one seat left open at HRT it is unlikely that he will be on the grid in 2012.

Former rival Hill, who raced against Barrichello for seven seasons in F1, believes that he was a big part of the grand prix scene.

“There are a limited number of characters in F1 and Rubens has been thoroughly a positive character,” Hill, newly confirmed as a member of the Sky Sports F1 HD coverage, told AUTOSPORT. “People like and respect Rubens and his abilities.

“He has had an incredibly long career and that is worth a lot – he’s the most experienced F1 driver ever so people will miss him as a person and a driver.”

Hill reckons that if Barrichello’s F1 career is over, it will be difficult for him to adjust to no longer being a grand prix driver.

Barrichello has raced in F1 full-time since 1993 and Hill pointed out that there are few other categories that can offer the same feeling as racing at the top level.

“It’s a really difficult thing for drivers to give up, or to be forced to give up, something they really love and that is their way of life,” said Hill, who retired at the end of 1999.

“You know as a driver that some day it’s going to happen and that you will have to stop. The shame is that there is nowhere to go next for a driver.

“You could go to DTM, but nothing is the same as F1 and there’s no gradual climbdown from it.

“When you’ve been doing it as long as Rubens has, when March comes around, it’s going to be a shock to the system.”

Barrichello has yet to make clear his plans for 2012, although he did wish Bruno Senna, who landed the Williams seat, good luck and say that “the future is wide open” on Twitter.

Autosport

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You're making my point for me. 95 is not "premium". It is a "slightly higher octane" version of the basic 91 product. The premium product that they want people to buy (for all the venal corporate reasons of making more profit, and all the possibly specious reasons of it being a "better" fuel with nicer additive packages) is the 98 octane stuff. 95 is the classic middle child. No-one wants it. No-one cares about it. It is just there, occupying a space in the product hierarchy.
    • 98 and 95 have to meet the same national fuel standards beside the actual RON.  91 has lower standards (which are quite poor really), so 95 is certainly not 91 with some octane booster. It would be an easier argument to claim 98 is just 95 with some octane boosters. Also RON doesn't specify 'quality' in any sense, only the octane number.  Anything different retailers decide or not decide to add to their 95 or 98 is arbitrary and not defined by the RON figure.
    • Anyone know alternatives to powerplus tungsten? Can't find an alternative online. 
    • 95 is just a scam outright. 98 is the real "premium" with all the best detergents and other additive packages, and at least historically, used to be more dense also. 95 is just 91 bargain basement shit with a little extra octane rating. Of course, there's 91 and there's 91 also. I always (back in the 90s early 2000s) refused to put fuel in from supermarket related fuel chains on the basis that it was nasty half arsed shit imported from Indonesia. Nowadays, I suspect that there is little difference between the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the "bargain" chains and the nasty half-arsed shit brought in by the big brands, given that most of it is coming from the same SEAsian refineries. Anyway - if there's still anything to that logic, then it would apply to 95 also. 98 is only made in decent refineries and, as I said, is usually the "premium" fuel, both in terms of octane rating and "use this because it's good for your engine because it's got the unicorn jizz in it!".
    • Yeah since those first 2 replies I actually went and put some 98 in it and tbf it's already doing much better than the 95 (which is weird and makes my inner tinfoil hat wearer think the 95 was a crap batch), getting 8ish around town. Again, wonder if it takes a while to stabilize if the fuel is changed a couple of times. I swear cars used to just either run "well" or "s**t* in my 20s, none of this fuel optimisation business haha 
×
×
  • Create New...